Rapamycin blocks the phosphorylation of 4E‐BP1 and inhibits cap‐dependent initiation of translation.

The immunosuppressant drug rapamycin blocks progression of the cell cycle at the G1 phase in mammalian cells and yeast. Here we show that rapamycin inhibits cap‐dependent, but not cap‐independent, translation in NIH 3T3 cells. Cap‐dependent translation is also specifically reduced in extracts from rapamycin‐treated cells, as determined by in vitro translation experiments. This inhibition is causally related to the dephosphorylation and consequent activation of 4E‐BP1, a protein recently identified as a repressor of the cap‐binding protein, eIF‐4E, function. These effects of rapamycin are specific as FK506, a structural analogue of rapamycin, had no effect on either cap‐dependent translation or 4E‐BP1 phosphorylation. The rapamycin‐FK506 binding protein complex is the effector of the inhibition of 4E‐BP1 phosphorylation as excess of FK506 over rapamycin reversed the rapamycin‐mediated inhibition of 4E‐BP1 phosphorylation. Thus, inactivation of eIF‐4E is, at least in part, responsible for inhibition of cap‐dependent translation in rapamycin‐treated cells. Furthermore, these results suggest that 4E‐BP1 phosphorylation is mediated by the FRAP/TOR signalling pathway.

[1]  A. Gingras,et al.  4E-BP1 phosphorylation is mediated by the FRAP-p70s6k pathway and is independent of mitogen-activated protein kinase. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  I. Stansfield,et al.  An MBoC Favorite: TOR controls translation initiation and early G1 progression in yeast , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  P. Blackshear,et al.  Control of PHAS-I by Insulin in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  E. Krebs,et al.  cAMP- and rapamycin-sensitive regulation of the association of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E and the translational regulator PHAS-I in aortic smooth muscle cells. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  R. Abraham,et al.  Isolation of a Protein Target of the FKBP12-Rapamycin Complex in Mammalian Cells (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Interaction between FKBP12-rapamycin and TOR involves a conserved serine residue. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[7]  A. Nairn,et al.  Rapamycin selectively inhibits translation of mRNAs encoding elongation factors and ribosomal proteins. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  PHAS-I as a link between mitogen-activated protein kinase and translation initiation. , 1994, Science.

[9]  A. Gingras,et al.  Insulin-dependent stimulation of protein synthesis by phosphorylation of a regulator of 5'-cap function , 1994, Nature.

[10]  T. Haystead,et al.  Phosphorylation of PHAS-I by mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase. Identification of a site phosphorylated by MAP kinase in vitro and in response to insulin in rat adipocytes. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  Paul Tempst,et al.  RAFT1: A mammalian protein that binds to FKBP12 in a rapamycin-dependent fashion and is homologous to yeast TORs , 1994, Cell.

[12]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  A mammalian protein targeted by G1-arresting rapamycin–receptor complex , 1994, Nature.

[13]  G. Thomas,et al.  Rapamycin selectively represses translation of the "polypyrimidine tract" mRNA family. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Molecular cloning and tissue distribution of PHAS-I, an intracellular target for insulin and growth factors. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. Kunz,et al.  Target of rapamycin in yeast, TOR2, is an essential phosphatidylinositol kinase homolog required for G1 progression , 1993, Cell.

[16]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  eIF-4E Phosphorylation and the Regulation of Protein Synthesis , 1993 .

[17]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  mRNAs containing extensive secondary structure in their 5′ non‐coding region translate efficiently in cells overexpressing initiation factor eIF‐4E. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[18]  J. Avruch,et al.  Rapamycin-induced inhibition of the 70-kilodalton S6 protein kinase. , 1992, Science.

[19]  G. Crabtree,et al.  Rapamycin-FKBP specifically blocks growth-dependent activation of and signaling by the 70 kd S6 protein kinases , 1992, Cell.

[20]  R. Rhoads Protein synthesis, cell growth and oncogenesis. , 1991, Current opinion in cell biology.

[21]  J. Heitman,et al.  Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast , 1991, Science.

[22]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Chemistry and biology of the immunophilins and their immunosuppressive ligands. , 1991, Science.

[23]  R. Jackson,et al.  The novel mechanism of initiation of picornavirus RNA translation. , 1990, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[24]  L A Herzenberg,et al.  Two distinct signal transmission pathways in T lymphocytes are inhibited by complexes formed between an immunophilin and either FK506 or rapamycin. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Malignant transformation by a eukaryotic initiation factor subunit that binds to mRNA 5' cap , 1990, Nature.

[26]  N. Sigal,et al.  The immunosuppressive macrolides FK-506 and rapamycin act as reciprocal antagonists in murine T cells. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[27]  R. Jagus,et al.  Evaluation of protein phosphorylation state by a combination of vertical slab gel isoelectric focusing and immunoblotting. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[28]  S. P. Johnson,et al.  Phosphorylation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae equivalent of ribosomal protein S6 has no detectable effect on growth , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  B. Moss,et al.  Eukaryotic transient-expression system based on recombinant vaccinia virus that synthesizes bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Insertion mutagenesis to increase secondary structure within the 5′ noncoding region of a eukaryotic mRNA reduces translational efficiency , 1985, Cell.

[31]  A. Shatkin mRNA cap binding proteins: essential factors for initiating translation , 1985, Cell.

[32]  V. Agol,et al.  Differences between translation products of tick-borne encephalitis virus RNA in cell-free systems from Krebs-2 cells and rabbit reticulocytes: involvement of membranes in the processing of nascent precursors of flavivirus structural proteins. , 1984, Virology.

[33]  V. Agol,et al.  Complete translation of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA and faithful cleavage of virus‐specific proteins in a cell‐free system from Krebs‐2 cells , 1978, FEBS letters.

[34]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.