Relationship of 2D ultrasonic spectral parameters to the physical properties of soft tissue scatterers

We have conducted a general study that relates calibrated 2-D ultrasonic spectral parameters to the physical properties of sub-resolution tissue scatterers. Our 2-D spectra are computed form digital radio-frequency echo data obtained as the transducer linearly scans along the cross-range (scan direction) with increments smaller than the half beam width. Acquired data are Fourier transformed with respect to range (beam) and cross-range (scan) directions. To quantitatively measure and classify the physical properties of tissues, we have defined two spectral functions and four spectral parameters. The 2-D spectral functions are: radially integrated spectral power (RISP) and angularly integrated spectral power (AISP). The summary parameters are: peak value and 3-dB width of the RISP, slope and intercept of the AISP. These parameter are understood in terms of the beam properties, transducer parameters and the physical properties of the tissue microstructures including size, shape, orientation, concentration and acoustic impedance. Our theoretical model indicates that 1) the 3-dB width of the RISP is predominantly determined by the scatterer size along the beam direction; 2) the slope of the linear fit of the AISP is predominantly determined by the scatterer size along range direction; 3) the concentration and the relative acoustic impedance fluctuation of the scatterers change the overall spectrum magnitude. The predictions of the theoretical model have been verified using beef muscle fibers examined with 40 MHz center frequency.

[1]  Ronald H. Silverman,et al.  Ultrasonic spectrum analysis for assays of different scatterer morphologies: theory and very-high frequency clinical results , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[2]  Ernest J. Feleppa,et al.  Ultrasonic spectral-parameter imaging of the prostate , 1997, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[3]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasonic Detection of Parenchymal Structural Change in Diffuse Renal Disease , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[4]  V. Reuter,et al.  Typing of prostate tissue by ultrasonic spectrum analysis , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Theoretical framework for spectrum analysis in ultrasonic tissue characterization. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Relationship of Ultrasonic Spectral Parameters to Features of Tissue Microstructure , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Statistical framework for ultrasonic spectral parameter imaging. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  T J Hall,et al.  Parametric Ultrasound Imaging from Backscatter Coefficient Measurements: Image Formation and Interpretation , 1990, Ultrasonic imaging.

[9]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Relationship between collagen and ultrasonic backscatter in myocardial tissue. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J A Zagzebski,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging: in Vivo Results in Normal Liver , 1993, Ultrasonic imaging (Print).

[11]  Ronald H. Silverman,et al.  Ultrasonic spectrum analysis for tissue assays and therapy evaluation , 1997, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[12]  Tian Liu,et al.  Ultrasonic tissue characterization using 2-D spectrum analysis and its application in ocular tumor diagnosis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[13]  Tian Liu,et al.  Ultrasonic multifeature analysis procedures for breast lesion classification , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[14]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Anisotropy of the ultrasonic backscatter of myocardial tissue: I. Theory and measurements in vitro. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.