High-dose versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin in suboptimal ovarian cancer: a randomized study of the Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest.

PURPOSE The aim of the study was to compare high-versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin as primary chemotherapy for suboptimal stage III and IV ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred forty-five patients were randomized to receive six courses of cisplatin 50 or 100 mg/m2 plus epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The two treatment arms were well balanced; all patients had greater than 2 cm and 37.2% had greater than 5 cm of residual disease; 29.6% had stage IV disease. RESULTS Patients in the high-dose arm received a double dose-intensity and double total dose of cisplatin. The high-dose regimen induced significantly more episodes of leukopenia (47.8% v 32.8%, P = .05), thrombocytopenia (21.7% v 3.2%, P = .003), anemia (37.6% v 12.5%, P = .002), nephrotoxicity (six v one patient), and neurotoxicity (30.4% v 6.3%, P = .002). There were no significant differences in efficacy in terms of clinical response rate (high-dose 57.5% v low-dose 61.1%), pathologic complete response (CR) (9.6% v 18.1%), median survival times (29 v 24 months), and median progression-free survival (18 v 13 months). CONCLUSION This study shows that doubling the dose-intensity and total dose of cisplatin in combination with epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide has significant toxic effects and does not improve clinical outcome in patients with suboptimal ovarian cancer.

[1]  J. Berek,et al.  Assessment of dose-intensive therapy in suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Gore,et al.  Impact of doxorubicin on survival in advanced ovarian cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  E. Korn,et al.  Dose intensity analysis in advanced ovarian cancer patients. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  A. Rubagotti,et al.  The impact of received dose intensity on the outcome of advanced ovarian cancer. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[5]  J. Neijt,et al.  Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: 1998 consensus statements. , 1993 .

[6]  A. Gadducci,et al.  Carboplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide: a randomized trial in stage III-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  N. Geller,et al.  Association of disease‐free survival and percent of ideal dose in adjuvant breast chemotherapy , 1990, Cancer.

[8]  H. Ngan,et al.  A randomized study of high-dose versus low-dose cis-platinum combined with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Hong Kong Ovarian Carcinoma Study Group. , 1989, Chemotherapy.

[9]  W. Hryniuk,et al.  Dose intensity analysis of chemotherapy regimens in ovarian carcinoma. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  A. Rubagotti,et al.  A randomized trial comparing cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[12]  N. Mantel Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. , 1966, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[13]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .