Analysis of the human interaction with a wearable lower-limb exoskeleton

The design of a wearable robotic exoskeleton needs to consider the interaction, either physical or cognitive, between the human user and the robotic device. This paper presents a method to analyse the interaction between the human user and a unilateral, wearable lower-limb exoskeleton. The lower-limb exoskeleton function was to compensate for muscle weakness around the knee joint. It is shown that the cognitive interaction is bidirectional; on the one hand, the robot gathered information from the sensors in order to detect human actions, such as the gait phases, but the subjects also modified their gait patterns to obtain the desired responses from the exoskeleton. The results of the two-phase evaluation of learning with healthy subjects and experiments with a patient case are presented, regarding the analysis of the interaction, assessed in terms of kinematics, kinetics and/or muscle recruitment. Human-driven response of the exoskeleton after training revealed the improvements in the use of the device, while particular modifications of motion patterns were observed in healthy subjects. Also, endurance mechanical tests provided criteria to perform experiments with one post-polio patient. The results with the post-polio patient demonstrate the feasibility of providing gait compensation by means of the presented wearable exoskeleton, designed with a testing procedure that involves the human users to assess the human-robot interaction.

[1]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Describing gait as a sequence of states. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  S Micera,et al.  A two DoF finger for a biomechatronic artificial hand. , 2002, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[3]  K R Kaufman,et al.  Optimization and application of a wrap-spring clutch to a dynamic knee-ankle-foot orthosis. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  J. Michael,et al.  Preliminary Evidence for Effectiveness of a Stance Control Orthosis , 2004 .

[5]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  Immediate effects of a controllable knee ankle foot orthosis for functional compensation of gait in patients with proximal leg weakness , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[6]  H B Skinner,et al.  Ankle weight effect on gait: orthotic implications. , 1993, Orthopedics.

[7]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[8]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  H. Herr,et al.  Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Wearable Robots: Biomechatronic Exoskeletons , 2008 .

[11]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  Rationale for Multiple Compensation of Muscle Weakness Walking with a Wearable Robotic Orthosis , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  B. Heller,et al.  A new hybrid spring brake orthosis for controlling hip and knee flexion in the swing phase , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  William S. Harwin,et al.  Clinical potential and design of programmable mechanical impedances for orthotic applications , 1998, Robotica.

[14]  Hubertus F.J.M. Koopman,et al.  Reduction in the reflex latencies of the Rectus Femoris during gait perturbation experiments , 2007 .

[15]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Human-robot interaction via the transfer of power and information signals , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  R. W. Wirta,et al.  Energy‐Efficient Knee‐Ankle-Foot Orthosis: A Case Study , 1996 .

[18]  Eduardo Rocon de Lima,et al.  Design and implementation of an inertial measurement unit for control of artificial limbs: Application on leg orthoses , 2006 .

[19]  Eduardo Rocon,et al.  Mechatronics and bioinspiration in actuator design and control , 2008 .

[20]  H. Kazerooni,et al.  Hybrid Control of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2005 .

[21]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[22]  Eduardo Rocon,et al.  Biomechanical modelling of the upper limb for robotics-based orthotic tremor suppression , 2005 .

[23]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[24]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .