The strictest energy requirements in the world: An analysis of the path dependencies of a self-proclaimed success

50 years of progressively strengthened energy requirements in the Danish building code appear to be a success, as the energy consumption has remained constant despite an increase in the total area in requirement of heating. This article however argues that the building code mechanism is heavily influenced by path dependent regime structuration processes, and that the mechanism constitutes a barrier to more radical developments within low energy housing. Few and poorly organized frontrunner activities within low energy housing have accordingly taken place in a Danish context during the past decades. Finally it is proposed that the current development within the energy system provides opportunities for cultivating an improved transitional awareness and for carrying out experimental activities that may challenge the path dependencies of prevailing regime structuration processes.

[1]  Dru Meadows,et al.  Common ground, consensus building and continual improvement : standards and sustainable building, first international symposium , 2009 .

[2]  Å. Thidell,et al.  The challenges of energy efficiency innovations in the Nordic building sector : Greener Markets and Cleaner Technologies (GMCT) , 2008 .

[3]  Milou Beerepoot,et al.  Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector , 2007 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[5]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Moving Outside or Inside? Objectification and Reflexivity in the Governance of Socio-Technical Systems , 2007 .

[6]  Jens Stissing Jensen,et al.  The Sectorial Code - an inquiry into the contemporary sector development activities in the Danish construction industry , 2011 .

[7]  Knut Holtan Sørensen,et al.  How energy efficiency fails in the building industry , 2009 .

[8]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[9]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Green Buildings in Denmark – From radical ecology to consumer oriented market approaches? , 2004 .

[10]  Henk Visscher,et al.  Barriers and opportunities for labels for highly energy-efficient houses , 2010 .

[11]  Sarah Minty Working paper 7 , 2014 .

[12]  David Gann,et al.  Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. , 1998 .

[13]  Mikkel K. Kragh,et al.  Housing and energy in Denmark: past, present, and future challenges , 2010 .

[14]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: Multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969-2003) , 2007 .

[15]  F. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[16]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[17]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[18]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[19]  Ulrik Jørgensen,et al.  Sustainable transition of electronic products through waste policy , 2010 .

[20]  Michael Søgaard Jørgensen,et al.  Has social sustainability left the building? The recent conceptualization of “sustainability” in Danish buildings , 2012 .

[21]  Sverre Fossdal,et al.  Do standards and regulations supply the necessary incentive for sustainable building , 2003 .

[22]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  Competing explanations for adopting energy innovations for new office buildings , 2006 .

[23]  Eberhard Jochem Improving the efficiency of R&D and the market diffusion of energy technologies , 2009 .

[24]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[25]  Simon Guy,et al.  Designing Urban Knowledge: Competing Perspectives on Energy and Buildings , 2006 .

[26]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[27]  T. Lent,et al.  Rethinking Green Building Standards for Comprehensive Continuous Improvement , 2008 .