Modeling and Querying Vague Spatial Objects Using Shapelets

Research in modeling and querying spatial data has primarily focused on traditional "crisp" spatial objects with exact location and spatial extent. More recent work, however, has begun to address the need for spatial data types describing spatial phenomena that cannot be modeled by objects having sharp boundaries. Other work has focused on point objects whose location is not precisely known and is typically described using a probability distribution. In this paper, we present a new technique for modeling and querying vague spatial objects. Using shapelets, an image decomposition technique developed in astronomy, as base data type, we introduce a comprehensive set of low-level operations that provide building blocks for versatile high-level operations on vague spatial objects. In addition, we describe an implementation of this data model as an extension to PostgreSQL, including an indexing technique for shapelet objects. Unlike existing techniques for modeling and querying vague or fuzzy data, our approach is optimized for localized, smoothly varying spatial objects, and as such is more suitable for many real-world datasets.

[1]  Markus Schneider,et al.  Vague Regions , 1997, SSD.

[2]  Ralf Hartmut Güting,et al.  Supporting uncertainty in moving objects in network databases , 2005, GIS '05.

[3]  Yufei Tao,et al.  Indexing Multi-Dimensional Uncertain Data with Arbitrary Probability Density Functions , 2005, VLDB.

[4]  Michael W. Marcellin,et al.  JPEG2000 - image compression fundamentals, standards and practice , 2002, The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science.

[5]  John P. Snyder,et al.  Map Projection Transformation: Principles and Applications , 1999 .

[6]  Kyuseok Shim,et al.  Approximate query processing using wavelets , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[7]  GrayJim,et al.  Designing and mining multi-terabyte astronomy archives , 2000 .

[8]  G. Arfken,et al.  Mathematical methods for physicists 6th ed. , 1996 .

[9]  Markus Schneider,et al.  Topological Predicates Between Vague Spatial Objects , 2005, SSTD.

[10]  Ajit S. Bopardikar,et al.  Wavelet transforms - introduction to theory and applications , 1998 .

[11]  Ralf Hartmut Güting,et al.  Moving Objects Databases , 2005 .

[12]  Per H. Christensen Contour rendering , 1999, COMG.

[13]  Klaus H. Hinrichs,et al.  Managing uncertainty in moving objects databases , 2004, TODS.

[14]  Sunil Prabhakar,et al.  Managing Uncertainty in Sensor Databases , 2003 .

[15]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Imprecision in Finite Resolution Spatial Data , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[16]  Alexandre Refregier,et al.  Shapelets — II. A method for weak lensing measurements , 2003 .

[17]  Markus Schneider,et al.  Design and implementation of finite resolution crisp and fuzzy spatial objects , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[18]  David Altman,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theoretic Approaches for Handling Imprecision in Spatial Analysis , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Sunil Prabhakar,et al.  Managing uncertainty in sensor database , 2003, SGMD.

[20]  R. H. Berry,et al.  Modal decomposition of astronomical images with application to shapelets , 2004 .

[21]  Markus Schneider,et al.  Uncertainty Management for Spatial Data in Databases: Fuzzy Spatial Data Types , 1999, SSD.

[22]  A. Réfrégier Shapelets: I. a method for image analysis , 2001, astro-ph/0105178.

[23]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[24]  G. M. Bernstein,et al.  Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing , 2001 .

[25]  D. Wells,et al.  Fits: a flexible image transport system , 1981 .

[26]  G. Arfken Mathematical Methods for Physicists , 1967 .

[27]  R. Massey,et al.  Polar Shapelets , 2004, astro-ph/0408445.