Transparent and feasible uncertainty assessment adds value to applied ecosystem services modeling

Abstract We introduce a special issue that aims to simultaneously motivate interest in uncertainty assessment (UA) and reduce the barriers practitioners face in conducting it. The issue, “Demonstrating transparent, feasible, and useful uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services modeling,” responds to findings from a 2016 workshop of academics and practitioners that identified challenges and potential solutions to enhance the practice of uncertainty assessment in the ES community. Participants identified that one important gap was the lack of a compelling set of cases showing that UA can be feasibly conducted at varying levels of sophistication, and that such assessment can usefully inform decision-relevant modeling conclusions. This article orients the reader to the 11 other articles that comprise the special issue, and which span multiple methods and application domains, all with an explicit consideration of uncertainty. We highlight the value of UA demonstrated in the articles, including changing decisions, facilitating transparency, and clarifying the nature of evidence. We conclude by suggesting ways to promote further adoption of uncertainty analysis in ecosystem service assessments. These include: Easing the analytic workflows involved in UA while guarding against rote analyses, applying multiple models to the same problem, and learning about the conduct and value of UA from other disciplines.

[1]  A. D. Maldonado,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of the relationship between socioeconomy and ecosystem services in cultural landscapes , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[2]  David M. Martin,et al.  Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Using a strength-of-evidence approach to inform choices among alternatives. , 2018, Ecosystem services.

[3]  J. Sarmiento,et al.  Water Ecosystem Services: Policy support systems for the development of benefit-sharing mechanisms for water-related ecosystem services , 2015 .

[4]  Zuzana V. Harmáčková,et al.  Future uncertainty in scenarios of ecosystem services provision: Linking differences among narratives and outcomes , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[5]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Uncertainty analysis , 2001 .

[6]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Realizing modelling outcomes: A synthesis of success factors and their use in a retrospective analysis of 15 Australian water resource projects , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  An uncertain future, deep uncertainty, scenarios, robustness and adaptation: How do they fit together? , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Characterising performance of environmental models , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  T. Krueger,et al.  Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services , 2017 .

[11]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[12]  David Evans,et al.  Overview of methods , 2008 .

[13]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Toward best practice framing of uncertainty in scientific publications: A review of Water Resources Research abstracts , 2017 .

[14]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Pathways to bridge the biophysical realism gap in ecosystem services mapping approaches , 2017 .

[15]  S. Rosenfield Crafting usable knowledge. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[16]  E. Mckenzie,et al.  Understanding the Use of Ecosystem Service Knowledge in Decision Making: Lessons from International Experiences of Spatial Planning , 2014 .

[17]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services analyses: Seven challenges and practical responses , 2017 .

[18]  Tuula Packalen,et al.  Uncertainties related to climate change and forest management with implications on climate regulation in Finland , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[19]  H. P. Tappan Of the sensitivity. , 1840 .

[20]  S. Polasky,et al.  Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  James R. Meldrum,et al.  Improving confidence by embracing uncertainty: A meta-analysis of U.S. hunting values for benefit transfer , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[24]  Vivian Ochoa,et al.  Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: Publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges , 2017 .

[25]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[26]  R. Ashley,et al.  Including uncertainty in valuing blue and green infrastructure for stormwater management , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[27]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[28]  Ge Sun,et al.  The sensitivity of ecosystem service models to choices of input data and spatial resolution , 2018 .

[29]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in integrated environmental models for ecosystem service assessments: Frameworks, challenges and gaps , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[30]  Ioannis N. Athanasiadis,et al.  Machine learning for ecosystem services , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[31]  Maarten S. Krol,et al.  Identification and classification of uncertainties in the application of environmental models , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[32]  Steven Broekx,et al.  A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  D.M. Martin,et al.  Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Sensitivity of additive aggregation methods to scaling and compensation assumptions , 2018, Ecosystem services.

[34]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Motivating and improving uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services modeling to inform decisions Workshop report , 2018 .

[35]  Joseph H. Tarnecki,et al.  Diet composition uncertainty determines impacts on fisheries following an oil spill , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[36]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices , 2012 .

[37]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Simon Willcock,et al.  Do ecosystem service maps and models meet stakeholders’ needs? A preliminary survey across sub-Saharan Africa , 2016 .

[39]  B Burkhard,et al.  Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  A. Ausseil,et al.  Implications of future climatic uncertainty on payments for forest ecosystem services: The case of the East Coast of New Zealand , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[41]  Mark Mulligan,et al.  Uncertainty in data for hydrological ecosystem services modelling: Potential implications for estimating services and beneficiaries for the CAZ Madagascar , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[42]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .