Computerized display of past test results. Effect on outpatient testing.

STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of displaying previous results of diagnostic tests on the ordering of selected outpatient tests. DESIGN Sixteen-week controlled trial with a 13-week pre-intervention and 8-week post-intervention observation periods. Patients were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups so that each physician was his or her own control. Only scheduled visits were included. Randomization occurred before the pre-intervention observation period. SETTING Academic primary care general medicine clinic affiliated with an urban general hospital. SUBJECTS Pre-intervention period: 111 physicians (97 internal medicine residents, 14 faculty internists), 4683 patients, 5942 scheduled visits. INTERVENTION period: same 111 physicians, 5946 patients, 8148 visits. Post-intervention period: 76 physicians (62 residents, 14 faculty), 2571 patients, 2858 scheduled visits. INTERVENTION With an order for one of eight selected diagnostic tests through microcomputer workstations, a window was opened on the screen and previous test results were displayed along with the time interval between the first and last result. Tests were ordered for control patients into the same workstations without previous results displayed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Previous results of one or more study tests were available for display for 96% of scheduled patients. Significantly lower results (p less than 0.05 by paired t-test) for the selected tests were found for intervention patient visits than for control visits: charges per visit (mean +/- SE) for intervention patients $12.17 +/- 0.62, compared with $13.99 +/- 0.77 for controls, a 13.0% difference; tests per visit were 0.51 +/- 0.03, compared with 0.56 +/- 0.03, an 8.5% difference. The number of study tests ordered decreased significantly for intervention patients (16.8%) and for controls (10.9%). During the post-intervention period, ordering of study tests increased for both groups, but the increase from the intervention period was not significant. CONCLUSIONS Presenting physicians with previous test results reduced the ordering of those tests. The actual effect may have been greater than 13%, because there were reductions in study tests ordered for both intervention and control patients during the intervention period when compared with the pre-intervention period, and both tended to rise after the intervention, or display, was turned off.

[1]  Drinkwater Bl.  Performance of civil aviation pilots under conditions of sensory input overload. , 1967 .

[2]  G. Miller,et al.  Continuing education and patient care research. Physician response to screening test results. , 1967, JAMA.

[3]  J. K. Cooper,et al.  Use of laboratory tests and pharmaceuticals. Variation among physicians and effect of cost audit on subsequent use. , 1973, JAMA.

[4]  J F Fries,et al.  Alternatives in Medical Record Formats , 1974, Medical care.

[5]  R L Kane,et al.  A controlled trial of multiphasic screening. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  An educational program to modify laboratory use by house staff. , 1977, Journal of medical education.

[7]  G O Barnett,et al.  Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system. , 1978, Medical care.

[8]  S. Gehlbach,et al.  Effects of an educational feedback strategy on physician utilization of thyroid function panels. , 1979, The Journal of family practice.

[9]  D. E. Rogers,et al.  Medical technology -- a different view of the contentious debate over costs. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  L. A. Thibodeau,et al.  A trial of two strategies to modify the test-ordering behavior of medical residents. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Christensen-Szalanski,et al.  Phased trial of a proven algorithm at a new primary care clinic. , 1982, American journal of public health.

[12]  C J McDonald,et al.  The effect of immediate access to a computerized medical record on physician test ordering: a controlled clinical trial in the emergency room. , 1982, American journal of public health.

[13]  E. Wong,et al.  Ordering of laboratory tests in a teaching hospital. Can it be improved? , 1983, JAMA.

[14]  D W Simborg,et al.  The failure of physician education as a cost containment strategy. Report of a prospective controlled trial at a university hospital. , 1984, JAMA.

[15]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Cost containment and labor-intensive tests. The case of the leukocyte differential count. , 1984, JAMA.

[16]  D. S. Kitz,et al.  Teaching Cost-Effective Diagnostic Test Use to Medical Students , 1984, Medical care.

[17]  R. Haynes,et al.  A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education. , 1984, JAMA.

[18]  R F Beckley,et al.  Clinical computing in a teaching hospital. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Q. Whiting-O'Keefe,et al.  A computerized summary medical record system can provide more information than the standard medical record. , 1985, JAMA.

[20]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  The treatment advice of a computer-based cancer chemotherapy protocol advisor. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  C J McDonald,et al.  Serum Potassium Testing in Diuretic-Treated Outpatients , 1985, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[22]  J. Pezzullo,et al.  Inpatient Management Protocols to Reduce Health Care Costs , 1986, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.