The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on the Environment: Market Perspectives and Evidence from China

Foreign direct investment (FDI) may have a positive effect on the level of pollution in host countries, as described by the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH). However, this kind of effect may depend on the economic conditions in host countries. In this study, we conduct research on the FDI’s effect on China’s CO2 emissions during the market-oriented reform. The results are as follows. Firstly, FDI directly promotes China’s CO2 emissions. Secondly, with market-oriented reform, this positive effect from FDI is lowering year by year, which indicates that the market-oriented reform could alleviate the positive effect of FDI on China’s CO2 emissions. Thirdly, as China’s market-oriented reform was implemented gradually from experimental zones to the whole country, regional market development is uneven, and as such so is FDI’s effect on local CO2 emissions. Provinces in the eastern area generally evidenced higher market development and lower CO2 emissions from FDI, while four provinces in west area evidenced both lower market development and higher CO2 emissions from FDI.

[1]  Dongxiao Niu,et al.  Have market-oriented reforms improved the electricity generation efficiency of China's thermal power industry? An empirical analysis , 2016 .

[2]  Elena Verdolini,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European Manufacturing Sectors , 2014 .

[3]  Tonghui Lian,et al.  The effects of environmental regulation on the industrial location of China’s manufacturing , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[4]  Matthew A. Cole,et al.  Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages , 2004 .

[5]  Do Recipient Country Characteristics Affect International Spillovers of CO2-Efficiency via Trade and Foreign Direct Investment? , 2010 .

[6]  Kerui Du,et al.  Sources of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: A nonparametric metafrontier approach , 2014 .

[7]  Hua Wang,et al.  Are Foreign Investors Attracted to Weak Environmental Regulations? Evaluating the Evidence from China , 2005 .

[8]  Matthew C. H. Yeung,et al.  FDI and pollution: a granger causality test using panel data , 2005 .

[9]  Matthew A. Cole,et al.  Institutionalized pollution havens , 2009 .

[10]  Minjun Shi,et al.  Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: Evidence from China's polluting industries , 2017 .

[11]  Mary Riddel,et al.  A further inquiry into the Pollution Haven Hypothesis and the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 2010 .

[12]  Jie He,et al.  Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces , 2006 .

[13]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China's regional economies: Do market-oriented reforms matter? , 2015 .

[14]  David Wheeler,et al.  Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where Are the Pollution Havens? , 1993 .

[15]  J. Breitung,et al.  Inference on the cointegration rank in fractionally integrated processes , 2002 .

[16]  Sunghoon Chung.  Environmental Regulation and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from South Korea , 2014 .

[17]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis , 1997 .

[18]  Randy A. Becker,et al.  Effects of Air Quality Regulation on in Polluting Industries , 1997 .

[19]  Simon Condliffe,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Environmental Regulation Enforcement and the Firm Location Decision among U.S. Counties , 2009 .

[20]  Testing the null of stationarity for multiple time series , 1999 .

[21]  Wenhua Di.  Pollution abatement cost savings and FDI inflows to polluting sectors in China , 2007, Environment and Development Economics.

[22]  Daniel A. Gerlowski,et al.  WHAT ATTRACTS FOREIGN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS? EVIDENCE FROM BRANCH PLANT LOCATION IN THE UNITED STATES , 1992 .

[23]  Robert J. Elliott,et al.  Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations , 2003 .

[24]  Kaddour Hadri.  A note on Sargan Densities , 1996 .

[25]  W. Koo,et al.  The Environmental Consequences of Globalization: A Country-Specific Time Series Analysis , 2009 .

[26]  E. Silva,et al.  Emissions trading of global and local pollutants, pollution havens and free riding , 2009 .

[27]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels , 2003 .

[28]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties , 2002 .

[29]  Jack Hou.  Economic reform of China: Cause and effects , 2011 .

[30]  Dao-Zhi Zeng,et al.  Pollution Havens and Industrial Agglomeration , 2006 .

[31]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Pollution abatement activities and traditional productivity , 2007 .

[32]  C. Kolstad,et al.  Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment? , 1998 .

[33]  Usama Al-mulali,et al.  Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries , 2013 .

[34]  Elias Tzavalis,et al.  Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed , 1999 .

[35]  J. List,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment , 2000 .

[36]  D. Kellenberg.  An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy , 2009 .

[37]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  FDI and environmental regulations in China , 2008 .