A parametric performance evaluation of SMDBRP and AEDGRP routing protocols in underwater wireless sensor network for data transmission

More than seventy percent of the earth is sheltered by the water. Water region is not explored and not known what the condition of the earth in water. Underwater Research was limited due to the wired connection in last. Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) are a powerful discipline to explore and monitor the area of aquatic, rivers and submarine at-large place. UWSNs with hundreds of sensors information received from different locations and transmit the collected data to a particular user or hub, depending on the application and its requirements. There are different routing protocols that directly deploy the underwater environment which is used for data transmission between nodes. These routing protocols are: sink mobility depth based routing protocol (SMDBRP), aided efficient data gathering routing protocol (AEDGRP). For deep and shallow water, the node density plays a vital role in data transmission. Performance evaluation of routing protocols which are based on node density is depended upon these parameters: data delivery ratio, an end to end delay and data packet losses in communication. Network simulator NS-2 is used for this purpose. Our simulation results show that which routing protocol is best for data transmission in the respect of throughputs, data packet loss, and propagation delay. The result shows that the SMDBRP is preeminent work in the different situations.

[1]  Komal Patel Underwater Sensor Networking , 2014 .

[2]  Kei Sawai,et al.  Development of Underwater Monitoring Wireless Sensor Network to Support Coral Reef Observation , 2014, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[3]  Kee Chaing Chua,et al.  Sector-Based Routing with Destination Location Prediction for Underwater Mobile Networks , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[4]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  DBR: Depth-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, Networking.

[5]  Dongkyun Kim,et al.  EEDBR: Energy-Efficient Depth-Based Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2011 .

[6]  Seyed Mohammad Ghoreyshi,et al.  Void-Handling Techniques for Routing Protocols in Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Low Tang Jung,et al.  Flooding control by using Angle Based Cone for UWSNs , 2012, 2012 International Symposium on Telecommunication Technologies.

[8]  Peng Xie,et al.  VBF: Vector-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2006, Networking.

[9]  M. Gerla,et al.  Challenges : Building Scalable and Distributed Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks ( UWSNs ) for Aquatic Applications , 2005 .

[10]  Harpinder Kaur,et al.  Link state and forwarding nodes constraint based DBR in UWSN (LCDBR) , 2016, 2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO).

[11]  Mari Carmen Domingo,et al.  Energy analysis of routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[12]  Qin Gao,et al.  Relative Distance-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2013 .