Taking the Basic Structure Seriously

The theory of justice that John Rawls spent his life developing and refining contains dozens of ideas that each have spurred major scholarly debate. One of these is that the subject of justice is the basic structure of society. In his major works Rawls gives slightly different formulations to the concept of basic structure, but the core idea remains the same. Early in A Theory of Justice Rawls proposes to offer “a conception of justice as providing in the first instance a standard whereby the distributive aspects of the basic structure of society are to be assessed.” Political Liberalism devotes an entire chapter to explicating what it means to say that the basic structure is the subject of justice. There Rawls defines basic structure “as the way in which major social institutions fit together into one system, and how they assign fundamental rights and duties and shape the division of advantages that arise through social cooperation”. More recently, Rawls reiterates the notion of the basic structure in Justice as Fairness: A Restatement:Iris Marion Young is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago (iyoung@uchicago.edu). Among books she has published is Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 2000. Global Challenges: On War, Self-Determination and Global Justice is forthcoming from Polity Press in 2006.

[1]  S. Scheffler The Appeal of Political Liberalism , 1994, Ethics.

[2]  G. Shiffman Construing Disagreement , 2002 .

[3]  Race and Ethnicity, Rawls, Race, and Reason , 2004 .

[4]  L. Murphy Institutions and the Demands of Justice , 1998 .

[5]  Leif Wenar,et al.  Political Liberalism: An Internal Critique , 1995, Ethics.

[6]  J. Hampton Should Political Philosophy be Done Without Metaphysics? , 1989, Ethics.

[7]  S. Feldman,et al.  The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare , 2001 .

[8]  Egalitarian justice and interpersonal comparison , 1999 .

[9]  Rawls’ Theory of Justice: Domestic and International Perspectives , 1977 .

[10]  J. Rawls Justice as Fairness , 2001 .

[11]  S. Caney Cosmopolitanism and the Law of Peoples , 2002 .

[12]  J. Bohman Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism , 1995 .

[13]  A. Bloom,et al.  Justice: John Rawls Vs. The Tradition of Political Philosophy , 1975 .

[14]  Sharon R. Krause Desiring Justice: Motivation and Justification in Rawls and Habermas , 2005 .

[15]  M. Blake Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy , 2001 .

[16]  A. Buchanan Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World* , 2000, Ethics.

[17]  Iris Marion Young,et al.  Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgments of Injustice , 2001 .

[18]  S. Benhabib The Law of Peoples, Distributive Justice, and Migrations , 2004 .

[19]  M. Walzer I. Liberalism and the Art of Separation , 1984 .

[20]  Michael W. Doyle,et al.  Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs , 1997 .

[21]  Thomas Nagel,et al.  The Problem of Global Justice , 2005, Global Justice.

[22]  J. Rawls Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory , 1980 .

[23]  R. Rorty Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism , 1983 .

[24]  Arthur Diquattro Rawls and Left Criticism , 1983 .

[25]  John W. Chapman,et al.  Rawls's Theory of Justice , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[26]  Charles R. Beitz Rawls's Law of Peoples* , 2000, Ethics.

[27]  J. Harsanyi Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory , 1975 .

[28]  F. R. Westie THE AMERICAN DILEMMA: AN EMPIRICAL TEST. , 1965, American sociological review.

[29]  John Rawls,et al.  Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical , 1991 .

[30]  A. Buchanan Recognitional Legitimacy and the State System , 1999 .

[31]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Justice: Means versus Freedoms , 1990 .

[32]  D. Davis,et al.  Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America , 2004 .

[33]  John Rawls,et al.  Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls's Theory of Justice , 1973 .

[34]  Emily Hauptmann A Local History of “The Political” , 2004 .

[35]  Thomas Pogge,et al.  An Egalitarian Law of Peoples , 1994 .

[36]  M. Walzer The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism , 1990 .

[37]  Andrew Kuper,et al.  Rawlsian Global Justice , 2000 .

[38]  Thomas Pogge On the Site of Distributive Justice: Reflections on Cohen and Murphy , 2000 .

[39]  Michael J. Sandel The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self , 1984 .

[40]  Charles R. Beitz Justice and International Relations , 1986, International Ethics.

[41]  G. Gaus Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political: How the Weaknesses of John Rawls's Political Liberalism Can be Overcome by a Justificatory Liberalism , 1999 .

[42]  Samuel Freeman,et al.  Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment , 2000 .

[43]  John Rawls,et al.  The Idea Of An Overlapping Consensus , 1987 .

[44]  K. Tan John Rawls, The Law of Peoples: With the ‘Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press1999. Pp. vii + 199. , 2001 .

[45]  Ronald Dworkin,et al.  What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources , 1981 .

[46]  J. Galbraith A perfect crime: inequality in an age of globalization , 2002 .

[47]  Thomas Mccarthy Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue , 1994, Ethics.

[48]  B. Barber Justifying Justice: Problems of Psychology, Measurement, and Politics in Rawls , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[49]  Brian Barry,et al.  John Rawls and the Search for Stability , 1995, Ethics.

[50]  Susan Moller Okin,et al.  Reason and Feeling in Thinking about Justice , 1989, Ethics.

[51]  J. Raz,et al.  Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence , 1995 .

[52]  David M. Estlund Debate: Liberalism, Equality, and Fraternity in Cohen’s Critique of Rawls , 1998 .

[53]  Ronald Dworkin,et al.  What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare , 1981 .

[54]  B. Ackerly Is Liberalism the Only Way Toward Democracy? , 2005 .

[55]  A. Buchanan Assessing the Communitarian Critique of Liberalism , 1989, Ethics.

[56]  Anne Phillips,et al.  Defending equality of outcome , 2004 .

[57]  A. Laden The House That Jack Built: Thirty Years of Reading Rawls* , 2003, Ethics.

[58]  G. Cohen,et al.  Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice , 1997 .

[59]  G. Klosko Political Constructivism in Rawls's Political Liberalism , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[60]  John Rawls,et al.  The Law of Peoples , 1993, Critical Inquiry.

[61]  Elizabeth Anderson,et al.  What Is the Point of Equality? , 1999, Ethics.

[62]  S. Okin ‘Forty acres and a mule’ for women: Rawls and feminism , 2005 .

[63]  S. Okin Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender , 1994, Ethics.

[64]  Peter Berkowitz The demagoguery of democratic theory , 2003 .