Familiarity is not notoriety: phenomenological accounts of face recognition

From a phenomenological perspective, faces are perceived differently from objects as their perception always involves the possibility of a relational engagement (Bredlau, 2011). This is especially true for familiar faces, i.e., faces of people with a history of real relational engagements. Similarly, valence of emotional expressions assumes a key role, as they define the sense and direction of this engagement. Following these premises, the aim of the present study is to demonstrate that face recognition is facilitated by at least two variables, familiarity and emotional expression, and that perception of familiar faces is not influenced by orientation. In order to verify this hypothesis, we implemented a 3 × 3 × 2 factorial design, showing 17 healthy subjects three type of faces (unfamiliar, personally familiar, famous) characterized by three different emotional expressions (happy, hungry/sad, neutral) and in two different orientation (upright vs. inverted). We showed every subject a total of 180 faces with the instructions to give a familiarity judgment. Reaction times (RTs) were recorded and we found that the recognition of a face is facilitated by personal familiarity and emotional expression, and that this process is otherwise independent from a cognitive elaboration of stimuli and remains stable despite orientation. These results highlight the need to make a distinction between famous and personally familiar faces when studying face perception and to consider its historical aspects from a phenomenological point of view.

[1]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  A. M. Burton,et al.  100% Accuracy in Automatic Face Recognition , 2008, Science.

[3]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Neural correlates of personally familiar faces: Parents, partner and own faces , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[4]  C. Carbon,et al.  Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[5]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[6]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Tranel,et al.  Positive facial affect facilitates the identification of famous faces , 2005, Brain and Language.

[10]  A. Damasio,et al.  Electrodermal discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a methodology. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[11]  G. Arciero,et al.  Selfhood, Identity and Personality Styles , 2009 .

[12]  M. Ratcliffe The phenomenological role of affect in the Capgras delusion , 2008 .

[13]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Andrew J. Edmonds,et al.  Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review , 2009, Memory.

[15]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why? , 2004, Psychological research.

[16]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Intersubjectivity in perception , 2008 .

[17]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[20]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  Sylvia Weir,et al.  Action perception , 1974 .

[22]  J. Cole About face , 1998, Nature.

[23]  P. Hancock,et al.  Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  H. Wilson,et al.  Quantifying facial expression recognition across viewing conditions , 2006, Vision Research.

[25]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  E. Gilboa-Schechtman,et al.  Memory bias in generalized social phobia: remembering negative emotional expressions. , 2000, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[27]  Zhe Wang,et al.  Activation of Face Expertise and the Inversion Effect , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  Beata Stawarska Mutual gaze and social cognition , 2006 .

[29]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  The effects of happy and angry expressions on identity and expression memory for unfamiliar faces , 2003, Cognition & emotion.

[30]  Karla K. Evans,et al.  Spontaneous retrieval of affective person knowledge in face perception , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Marianne Schmid Mast,et al.  Emotion Recognition: The Role of Featural and Configural Face Information , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Ellen Leibenluft,et al.  Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  C. Kleinke Gaze and eye contact: a research review. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[35]  Glenda C. Prkachin,et al.  The effects of orientation on detection and identification of facial expressions of emotion. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[36]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , 2009 .

[37]  M. Junghöfer,et al.  On the interplay between familiarity and emotional expression in face perception , 2008, Psychological research.

[38]  Verso una neuropsicopatologia ermeneutica , 2013 .

[39]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.

[40]  S. McKelvie Emotional expression in upside-down faces: evidence for configurational and componential processing. , 1995, The British journal of social psychology.

[41]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[42]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[43]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[44]  B. Hood,et al.  Look into my eyes: Gaze direction and person memory , 2004, Memory.

[45]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[46]  A. Young,et al.  Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  Jean-Yves Baudouin,et al.  When the smile is a cue to familiarity , 2000, Memory.

[48]  G. Gainotti Familiar people recognition disorders: an introductory review. , 2014, Frontiers in bioscience.

[49]  Mark A. Williams,et al.  Investigating the Features of the M170 in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[50]  Matthew Ratcliffe,et al.  Heidegger's attunement and the neuropsychology of emotion , 2002 .

[51]  M. Linden,et al.  "Facial expressions of emotion influence memory for facial identity in an automatic way": Correction to D'Argembeau and Van der Linden (2007). , 2007 .

[52]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  Facial expressions of emotion influence memory for facial identity in an automatic way. , 2007, Emotion.

[53]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expression Influences the Recognition of Familiar Faces , 2004, Perception.

[54]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  Tim Valentine,et al.  Understanding Provoked Overt Recognition in Prosopagnosia: , 2001 .

[56]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect , 2010, Cortex.

[57]  Susan Bredlau Monstrous faces and a world transformed: Merleau-Ponty, Dolezal, and the enactive approach on vision without inversion of the retinal image , 2011 .

[58]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  A. Ohman,et al.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  R. Bauer,et al.  Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A neuropsychological application of the guilty knowledge test , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  W. Singer,et al.  Source-Reconstruction of Event-Related Fields Reveals Hyperfunction and Hypofunction of Cortical Circuits in Antipsychotic-Naive, First-Episode Schizophrenia Patients during Mooney Face Processing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  Beatrice ede Gelder,et al.  Face identity matching is influenced by emotions conveyed by face and body , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[63]  H. Ellis,et al.  The emotional impact of faces (but not names): Face specific changes in skin conductance responses to familiar and unfamiliar people , 1999 .

[64]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. , 2004, Psychophysiology.