The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation

In a dual-task paradigm, a visual display (T1) containing characters (letters or symbols) was presented first, followed by an auditory signal (T2) at various stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs). A speeded response to T2 was required. When the information in T1 had to be recalled later, response times to T2 (RT2) were elevated at short SOAs and decreased as SOA was increased. The effects on RT2 were larger when there were more items to be remembered. We interpreted the results as evidence that encoding information into short-term memory (STM) involves a distinct process, which we call short-term consolidation (STC). The results suggested that STC has limited capacity and that it requires central processing mechanisms. Additional evidence suggested that no memory for T1 was formed in STM when STC was not engaged.

[1]  Charles S. Myers,et al.  On reaction times. , 1909 .

[2]  C. W. Telford.  The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .

[3]  R. Davis,et al.  The Role of “Attention” in the Psychological Refractory Period , 1959 .

[4]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[5]  B. Underwood,et al.  Meaningfulness and verbal learning , 1960 .

[6]  B. Foss.  New Horizons in Psychology 1 , 1966 .

[7]  P. Bertelson.  Central Intermittency Twenty Years Later * , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Theories of the psychological refractory period. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  M. C. Smith,et al.  The Psychological Refractory Period as a Function of Performance of a First Response , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  L. Karlin,et al.  Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[12]  Donald B. Headley,et al.  Reaction time as an index of rehearsal in short-term memory. , 1969 .

[13]  Paul Bertelson,et al.  Refractory period of c-reactions , 1969 .

[14]  R. Atkinson,et al.  The control of short-term memory. , 1971, Scientific American.

[15]  G. Sperling,et al.  Extremely Rapid Visual Search: The Maximum Rate of Scanning Letters for the Presence of a Numeral , 1971, Science.

[16]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[17]  J Martin,et al.  Intertask delay as a parameter of perceptual deficit in divided attention. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  S. Greenberg,et al.  Perceptual deficit due to division of attention between memory and perception. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[20]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[21]  F. Craik,et al.  The role of rehearsal in short-term memory , 1973 .

[22]  E M Comstock,et al.  Processing capacity in a letter-matching task. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.

[24]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[25]  K Millar,et al.  Processing capacity requirements of stimulus encoding. , 1975, Acta psychologica.

[26]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[27]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Attention in Character-Classification Tasks : Evidence for the Automaticity of Component Stages , 1978 .

[28]  R W Proctor,et al.  Secondary task modality, expectancy, and the measurement of attentional capacity. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J. Duncan.  The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[31]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  David W. Martin,et al.  Processing demands of encoding: What does secondary task performance reflect? , 1980 .

[33]  P. Mott.  On the Function of Consciousness , 1982 .

[34]  J. Forester,et al.  Resource allocation and the attentional demands of letter encoding. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Perceptual interference between spatially separate sequential displays. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[36]  J Duncan,et al.  Perceptual selection based on alphanumeric class: Evidence from partial reports , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  S. Pinker,et al.  Visual cognition : An introduction * , 1989 .

[38]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Sensory memory: a tutorial review , 1984 .

[39]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Exploring the Articulatory Loop , 1984 .

[40]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[41]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  L A Thompson,et al.  Central resource involvement during the visual search for single features and conjunctions of features. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[44]  D. Schacter.  Implicit memory: History and current status. , 1987 .

[45]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computational processes in human vision : an interdisciplinary perspective , 1988 .

[46]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Pathways in early vision , 1988 .

[47]  H. Pashler.  Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  J. Townsend.  Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[49]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Mental rotation, physical rotation, and surface media. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Processing implicit and explicit representations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[51]  F. O. Huck,et al.  Visual Information Processing , 1992 .

[52]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  M. Potter.  Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[54]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Dual-Task Interference and Elementary Mental Mechanisms , 1993 .

[55]  R. D. de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[58]  R. Jong,et al.  Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  E. Marg.  A VISION OF THE BRAIN , 1994 .

[60]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[61]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  Roger W. Remington,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention , 1995 .

[63]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[64]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Structures, Processes, and the Flow of Information , 1996 .

[66]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[67]  The function of consciousness , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[68]  P. Jolicoeur.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[69]  Roberto Dell'Acqua,et al.  Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding , 1999 .