International diffusion of embodied and disembodied technology: A network analysis approach

Abstract This study proposes a quantitative method for investigating the structure of international technology diffusion. By using network analysis, this study defines the structural configuration of each country within the international diffusion network by measuring its degree, closeness, and betweenness centralities. In addition, this study distinguishes between embodied technology diffusion, measured by multilateral trade, and disembodied technology diffusion, measured by patent citations, in individual countries. This study empirically tests a sample data set of international technology diffusion taken from 48 countries. The empirical results show that the structural configuration of countries exhibits similar patterns in both embodied and disembodied diffusion networks. Significant global stratification patterns exist in the capability of national international technology exportation and brokerage advantages. Moreover, this study distinguishes four blocks of countries that play different roles in international technology diffusion: the leading countries provide a source of technological knowledge; an intermediate group diffuses the knowledge acquired from the source; a third group is in the process of initiating the export of technological knowledge; and a final group of countries absorbs technological knowledge without reciprocal exportation. Finally, this study identifies two types of catch-up strategies that newly industrialized or developing countries can use to move up the international technology stratification.

[1]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[2]  L. Freeman.  Research Methods in Social Network Analysis , 1991 .

[3]  W. Keller.  The Geography and Channels of Diffusion at the World's Technology Frontier , 2001 .

[4]  J. Tybout,et al.  Product Quality, Productive Efficiency, and International Technology Diffusion: Evidence from Plant-Level Panel Data , 2002 .

[5]  E. Kick,et al.  Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955-1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2003 .

[7]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Capital Goods , 2001 .

[8]  R. Barro,et al.  Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth , 1992 .

[9]  Sangmoon Kim,et al.  A Longitudinal Analysis of Globalization and Regionalization in International Trade: A Social Network Approach , 2002 .

[10]  Robert J. Barro,et al.  Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth , 1995 .

[11]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  North-South R & D Spillovers , 1997 .

[12]  David A. Smith,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade 1965–1980 , 1992 .

[13]  Patrick Clawson,et al.  The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy: By the World Bank. (New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank, 1993. 389 pp. $19.95, paper.) , 1995 .

[14]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  D. Quah.  Technology Dissemination and Economic Growth: Some Lessons for the New Economy , 2002 .

[16]  Bin Xu.  Trade, FDI, and International Technology Diffusion , 2000 .

[17]  Bin Xu,et al.  Capital goods trade and R&D spillovers in the OECD , 1999 .

[18]  N. Arranz,et al.  Joint R&D projects: Experiences in the context of European technology policy , 2006 .

[19]  G. Gong,et al.  Convergence and polarization in global income levels: a review of recent results on the role of international technology diffusion , 2003 .

[20]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  Radical changes in inter-organizational network structures: The longitudinal gap , 2006 .

[21]  Subhashish Samaddar,et al.  Production, Manufacturing and Logistics Inter-organizational information sharing: The role of supply network configuration and partner goal congruence , 2006 .

[22]  Eric P. Chiang,et al.  Trade, Patents, and International Technology Diffusion , 2000 .

[23]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[24]  Norihisa Sakurai,et al.  Domestic and international product-embodied R&D diffusion , 1998 .

[25]  N. Arranz,et al.  Governance structures in R&D networks: An analysis in the European context , 2007 .

[26]  J. Eaton,et al.  Engines of Growth: Domestic and Foreign Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[27]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development , 2002 .

[28]  Paul Krugman,et al.  The Myth of Asia's Miracle , 1994 .

[29]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[30]  N. Lin,et al.  Social structure and network analysis , 1985 .

[31]  P. Arabie,et al.  An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling , 1975 .

[32]  E. Helpman.  General purpose technologies and economic growth , 1998 .

[33]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality , 1980 .

[34]  Detecting Positions in Networks: A Formal Analysis of Loose Social Structure in Rural Java , 1988 .

[35]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis , 2005 .

[36]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[37]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[38]  Sandro Montresor,et al.  Accounting for core and extra-core relationships in technological systems: a methodological proposal , 2005 .

[39]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[40]  Alain Degenne,et al.  Introducing Social Networks , 1999 .

[41]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  Encouraging International Technology Transfer , 2004 .