Muffler Performance Studies Using a Direct Mixed-Body Boundary Element Method and a Three-Point Method for Evaluating Transmission Loss

In this paper, a single-domain boundary element method is presented for muffler analysis. This method is based on a direct mixed-body boundary integral formulation recently developed for acoustic radiation and scattering from a mix of regular and thin bodies. The main feature of the mixed-body integral formulation is that it can handle all kinds of complex internal geometries, such as thin baffles, extended inlet/ outlet tubes, and perforated tubes, without using the tedious multi-domain approach. The variables used in the direct integral formulation are the velocity potential (or sound pressure) on the regular wall surfaces, and the velocity potential jump (or pressure jump ) on any thin-body or perforated surfaces. The linear impedance boundary condition proposed by Sullivan and Crocker (1978) for perforated tubes is incorporated into the mixed-body integral formulation. The transmission loss is evaluated by a new method called the three-point method. Unlike the conventional four-pole transfer-matrix approach that requires two separate computer runs for each frequency, the three-point method can directly evaluate the transmission loss in one single boundary-element run. Numerical results are compared to existing experimental data for three different muffler configurations.

[1]  J. W. Sullivan A method for modeling perforated tube muffler components. I. Theory , 1979 .

[2]  M. Hamdi,et al.  A new boundary finite element method for fluid–structure interaction problems , 1987 .

[3]  C WanG Prediction and measurement of the acoustic performance of mufflers. , 1995 .

[4]  Zhang Zhihua,et al.  Application of the Boundary Element Method to Predicting Acoustic Performance of Expansion Chamber Mufflers With Mean Flow , 1994 .

[5]  A. F. Seybert,et al.  A multidomain boundary element solution for silencer and muffler performance prediction , 1991 .

[6]  Yih-Nan Chen,et al.  A boundary element analysis of a concentric-tube resonator , 1993 .

[7]  L. Schmerr,et al.  Hypersingular Boundary Integral Equations: Some Applications in Acoustic and Elastic Wave Scattering , 1990 .

[8]  T. W. Wu A direct boundary element method for acoustic radiation and scattering from mixed regular and thin bodies , 1995 .

[9]  A. Pierce,et al.  Variational method for computing surface acoustic pressure on vibrating bodies, applied to transversely oscillating disks , 1987 .

[10]  A. F. Seybert,et al.  Experimental determination of acoustic properties using a two‐microphone random‐excitation technique , 1977 .

[11]  T. Terai On calculation of sound fields around three dimensional objects by integral equation methods , 1980 .

[12]  R. Martinez,et al.  The thin‐shape breakdown (TSB) of the Helmholtz integral equation , 1990 .

[13]  J. W. Sullivan A method for modeling perforated tube muffler components. II. Applications , 1979 .

[14]  T. W. Wu,et al.  Numerical modeling of acoustic radiation and scattering from thin bodies using a Cauchy principal integral equation , 1992 .

[15]  M. J. Crocker,et al.  Analysis of concentric‐tube resonators having unpartitioned cavities , 1978 .