Integrating `expert' and `interlanguage' computer corpora findings on causality: discoveries for teachers and students

Abstract Corpus linguistic techniques involve the use of concordancing software which identifies a KWIC (key-word-in-context) and thus provides empirical evidence on the lexico-grammatical patterning of certain items. Such corpus-based findings have either been used to inform materials design or used as input for CALL activities. However, to date, most of the work in this field has relied upon exploitation of native-speaker corpora. This paper proposes that a comparison of the findings from both learner and native-speaker corpora would also have important pedagogical applications. However, this in turn, raises the question as to how corpus-based findings can best be exploited in the ESP classroom.

[1]  S. Granger,et al.  Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non‐native EFL speakers of English , 1996 .

[2]  Tim Johns,et al.  Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar: From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of Data-driven Learning , 1994 .

[3]  Louis Trimble,et al.  English for Science and Technology: A Discourse Approach , 1985 .

[4]  Eugene O. Winter,et al.  A clause-relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse , 1977 .

[5]  Fang Xuelan,et al.  Expressing Causation in Written English , 1992 .

[6]  Anne Wichmann,et al.  Teaching and Language Corpora , 1997 .

[7]  John Sinclair,et al.  Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary , 1987 .

[8]  Jim Ronald,et al.  「Teaching and Language Corpora」Anne Wichmann,Steven Fligelstone,Tony McEnery and Gerry Knowles(eds.) , 1999 .

[9]  M. Hoey On the surface of discourse , 1983 .

[10]  W. Crombie Process and relation in discourse and language learning , 1985 .

[11]  Christine B. Feak,et al.  Academic Writing for Graduate Students , 1994 .

[12]  Vance Stevens Classroom concordancing: Vocabulary materials derived from relevant, authentic text , 1991 .

[13]  Deborah Schiffrin,et al.  Multiple constraints on discourse options: A quantitative analysis of causal sequences∗ , 1985 .

[14]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[15]  M. Stubbs Text and corpus analysis , 1996 .

[16]  Jansen Mt Synthesis in science , 1950 .

[17]  Lynne Flowerdew,et al.  Designing CALL courseware for an ESP situation: A report on a case study , 1995 .

[18]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks , 1994 .

[19]  J. Holmes MODIFYING ILLOCUTIONARY FORCE , 1984 .

[20]  Yvette Field,et al.  A Comparison of Internal Conjunctive Cohesion in the English Essay Writing of Cantonese Speakers and Native Speakers of English , 1992 .

[21]  R. Jordan,et al.  Academic Writing Course , 1980 .

[22]  D. Biber,et al.  Corpus-based Approaches to Issues in Applied Linguistics , 1994 .

[23]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[24]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[25]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Doubt and Certainty in ESL Textbooks , 1988 .

[26]  Lidia Woytak,et al.  Discourse and language learning : a relational approach to syllabus design , 1986 .

[27]  W. Crewe,et al.  The illogic of logical connectives , 1990 .