Individual alpha peak frequency predicts 10 Hz flicker effects on selective attention

Rhythmic visual stimulation (“flicker”) is primarily used to “tag” processing of low-level visual and high-level cognitive phenomena. However, preliminary evidence suggests that flicker may also entrain endogenous brain oscillations, thereby modulating cognitive processes supported by those brain rhythms. Here we tested the interaction between 10 Hz flicker and endogenous alpha-band (~10 Hz) oscillations during a selective visuospatial attention task. We recorded EEG from human participants (both genders) while they performed a modified Eriksen flanker task in which distractors and targets flickered within (10 Hz) or outside (7.5 or 15 Hz) the alpha band. By using a combination of EEG source separation, time-frequency, and single-trial linear mixed effects modeling, we demonstrate that 10 Hz flicker interfered with stimulus processing more on incongruent than congruent trials (high vs. low selective attention demands). Crucially, the effect of 10 Hz flicker on task performance was predicted by the distance between 10 Hz and individual alpha peak frequency (estimated during the task). Finally, the flicker effect on task performance was more strongly predicted by EEG flicker responses during stimulus processing than during preparation for the upcoming stimulus, suggesting that 10 Hz flicker interfered more with reactive than proactive selective attention. These findings are consistent with our hypothesis that visual flicker entrained endogenous alpha-band networks, which in turn impaired task performance. Our findings also provide novel evidence for frequency-dependent exogenous modulation of cognition that is determined by the correspondence between the exogenous flicker frequency and the endogenous brain rhythms. Significance Here we provide novel evidence that the interaction between exogenous rhythmic visual stimulation and endogenous brain rhythms can have frequency-specific behavioral effects. We show that alpha-band (10 Hz) flicker impairs stimulus processing in a selective attention task when the stimulus flicker rate matches individual alpha peak frequency. The effect of sensory flicker on task performance was stronger when selective attention demands were high, and was stronger during stimulus processing and response selection compared to the pre-stimulus anticipatory period. These findings provide novel evidence that frequency-specific sensory flicker affects online attentional processing, and also demonstrate that the correspondence between exogenous and endogenous rhythms is an overlooked prerequisite when testing for frequency-specific cognitive effects of flicker.

[1]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  The Role of Alpha Activity in Spatial and Feature-Based Attention , 2016, eNeuro.

[2]  A. Sack,et al.  Alpha-Band Rhythms in Visual Task Performance: Phase-Locking by Rhythmic Sensory Stimulation , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  P. Schyns,et al.  Entrainment of Perceptually Relevant Brain Oscillations by Non-Invasive Rhythmic Stimulation of the Human Brain , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[4]  Mike X. Cohen,et al.  MATLAB for Brain and Cognitive Scientists , 2017 .

[5]  J. Masdeu,et al.  Human Cerebral Activation during Steady-State Visual-Evoked Responses , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  O. Jensen,et al.  Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Alex I. Wiesman,et al.  Spatiotemporal oscillatory dynamics of visual selective attention during a flanker task , 2017, NeuroImage.

[8]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[10]  Annabelle Blangero,et al.  Exploiting individual primary visual cortex geometry to boost steady state visual evoked potentials , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  Ole Jensen,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Correlate with the Successful Inhibition of Unattended Stimuli , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Differential Roles of Frequency-following and Frequency-doubling Visual Responses Revealed by Evoked Neural Harmonics , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Lüdecke Sjplot - Data Visualization For Statistics In Social Science. , 2018 .

[14]  A. Compston The Berger rhythm: potential changes from the occipital lobes in man. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[16]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Rhythmic entrainment source separation: Optimizing analyses of neural responses to rhythmic sensory stimulation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[17]  D. Regan Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Attention Facilitates Multiple Stimulus Features in Parallel in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[19]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Single-Trial Regression Elucidates the Role of Prefrontal Theta Oscillations in Response Conflict , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[20]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Validating the boundary element method for forward and inverse EEG computations in the presence of a hole in the skull , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The Relation of Brain Oscillations to Attentional Networks , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[23]  A. Norcia,et al.  The 6Hz fundamental stimulation frequency rate for individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Alpha, beta: The rhythm of the attentional blink , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[25]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic recording of steadystate visual evoked cortical activity , 2005, Brain Topography.

[26]  Hedderik van Rijn,et al.  Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2014, NeuroImage.

[27]  E. Awh,et al.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  N. Weisz,et al.  Not so different after all: The same oscillatory processes support different types of attention , 2015, Brain Research.

[29]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Joram van Driel,et al.  Proactive, but Not Reactive, Distractor Filtering Relies on Local Modulation of Alpha Oscillatory Activity , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[32]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Theta Dynamics Reveal Domain-specific Control over Stimulus and Response Conflict , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  T. Wilson,et al.  Presence of strong harmonics during visual entrainment: A magnetoencephalography study , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[34]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Role of Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations as a Sensory Suppression Mechanism during Selective Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[35]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[36]  S. Martens,et al.  Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[37]  Nathan Weisz,et al.  Large-scale network-level processes during entrainment , 2016, Brain Research.

[38]  Kyle E. Mathewson,et al.  Power and Phase of Alpha Oscillations Reveal an Interaction between Spatial and Temporal Visual Attention , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  C. Herrmann Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Jonathan S. Lefcheck,et al.  piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics , 2015, 1509.01845.

[41]  Basabdatta Sen Bhattacharya,et al.  Nonlinear Origin of SSVEP Spectra—A Combined Experimental and Modeling Study , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[42]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[43]  D. P. Russell,et al.  Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Christian Keitel,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Brain Oscillations in the Alpha Range: Entrainment of Intrinsic Rhythms or Frequency-Following Response? , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  An objective method for measuring face detection thresholds using the sweep steady-state visual evoked response. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[46]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Making Waves in the Stream of Consciousness: Entraining Oscillations in EEG Alpha and Fluctuations in Visual Awareness with Rhythmic Visual Stimulation , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Modification of Brain Oscillations via Rhythmic Light Stimulation Provides Evidence for Entrainment but Not for Superposition of Event-Related Responses , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[48]  J. Williams,et al.  Frequency-specific effects of flicker on recognition memory , 2001, Neuroscience.

[49]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  Bertrand Thirion,et al.  Phase delays within visual cortex shape the response to steady-state visual stimulation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[51]  Floris P. de Lange,et al.  Local Entrainment of Alpha Oscillations by Visual Stimuli Causes Cyclic Modulation of Perception , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Comparison of linear spatial filters for identifying oscillatory activity in multichannel data , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[53]  D. Vernon,et al.  Interpreting EEG alpha activity , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[54]  D Regan,et al.  Clinical investigation of lesions of the visual pathway: a new objective technique. , 1969, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[55]  Assaf Breska,et al.  Automatic Bias of Temporal Expectations following Temporally Regular Input Independently of High-level Temporal Expectation , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  A. Nobre,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Related to Anticipatory Attention Follow Temporal Expectations , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Frequency Variation of a Pattern-Flash Visual Stimulus during PET Differentially Activates Brain from Striate through Frontal Cortex , 1997, NeuroImage.

[58]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials: Distributed Local Sources and Wave-Like Dynamics Are Sensitive to Flicker Frequency , 2006, Brain Topography.

[59]  L. Parra,et al.  Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[60]  A. de Cheveigné,et al.  Scanning for oscillations , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[61]  J Artieda,et al.  Topography of cortical activation differs for fundamental and harmonic frequencies of the steady-state visual-evoked responses. An EEG and PET H215O study. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[62]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Visual cortex responses reflect temporal structure of continuous quasi-rhythmic sensory stimulation , 2017, NeuroImage.

[63]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 2015 .

[64]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[65]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  Carsten Nicolas Boehler,et al.  Rapid Modulation of Sensory Processing Induced by Stimulus Conflict , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  W. Klimesch Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Brain Networks and α-Oscillations: Structural and Functional Foundations of Cognitive Control , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  Bradley R. Postle,et al.  Decoding and Reconstructing the Focus of Spatial Attention from the Topography of Alpha-band Oscillations , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  Reto Meuli,et al.  fMRI responses in medial frontal cortex that depend on the temporal frequency of visual input , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[71]  Saskia Haegens,et al.  Inter- and intra-individual variability in alpha peak frequency , 2014, NeuroImage.

[72]  G. Thut,et al.  Mechanisms of selective inhibition in visual spatial attention are indexed by α‐band EEG synchronization , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[73]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The Triple-Flash Illusion Reveals a Driving Role of Alpha-Band Reverberations in Visual Perception , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[74]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[75]  J. Gross,et al.  Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials Can Be Explained by Temporal Superposition of Transient Event-Related Responses , 2011, PloS one.

[76]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Two-dimensional mapping of the central and parafoveal visual field to human visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[77]  Mike Wendt,et al.  Disentangling Sequential Effects of Stimulus- and Response-related Conflict and Stimulus-Response Repetition using Brain Potentials , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[78]  M. Frank,et al.  Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[79]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[80]  E. Adrian,et al.  THE BERGER RHYTHM: POTENTIAL CHANGES FROM THE OCCIPITAL LOBES IN MAN , 1934 .

[81]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .