Single-molecule tracking reveals two low-mobility states for chromatin and transcriptional regulators within the nucleus

How transcription factors (TFs) navigate the complex nuclear environment to assemble the transcriptional machinery at specific genomic loci remains elusive. Using single-molecule tracking, coupled with machine learning, we examined the mobility of multiple transcriptional regulators. We show that H2B and ten different transcriptional regulators display two distinct low-mobility states. Our results indicate that both states represent dynamic interactions with chromatin. Ligand activation results in a dramatic increase in the proportion of steroid receptors in the lowest mobility state. Mutational analysis revealed that only chromatin interactions in the lowest mobility state require an intact DNA-binding domain as well as oligomerization domains. Importantly, these states are not spatially separated as previously believed but in fact, individual H2B and TF molecules can dynamically switch between them. Together, our results identify two unique and distinct low-mobility states of transcriptional regulators that appear to represent common pathways for transcription activation in mammalian cells.

[1]  M. Sung,et al.  NF-κB, a culprit of both inflamm-ageing and declining immunity? , 2022, Immunity & ageing : I & A.

[2]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Transcription-induced active forces suppress chromatin motion by inducing a transient disorder-to-order transition , 2022, bioRxiv.

[3]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Following the tracks: How transcription factor binding dynamics control transcription , 2022, Biophysical journal.

[4]  D. Levens,et al.  Mechanical determinants of chromatin topology and gene expression , 2022, Nucleus.

[5]  K. Bloom,et al.  Mechanisms of DNA Mobilization and Sequestration , 2022, Genes.

[6]  D. Mazza,et al.  The needle and the haystack: single molecule tracking to probe the transcription factor search in eukaryotes , 2021, Biochemical Society transactions.

[7]  B. van Steensel,et al.  Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer–promoter interactions , 2021, Nature.

[8]  S. Hell,et al.  MINFLUX nanometer-scale 3D imaging and microsecond-range tracking on a common fluorescence microscope , 2021, Nature Communications.

[9]  A. Upadhyaya,et al.  An intrinsically disordered region-mediated confinement state contributes to the dynamics and function of transcription factors. , 2021, Molecular cell.

[10]  Carl Wu,et al.  Single-molecule tracking of transcription protein dynamics in living cells: seeing is believing, but what are we seeing? , 2021, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[11]  T. Misteli.  The Self-Organizing Genome: Principles of Genome Architecture and Function , 2020, Cell.

[12]  J. Lerner,et al.  Two-Parameter Mobility Assessments Discriminate Diverse Regulatory Factor Behaviors in Chromatin. , 2020, Molecular cell.

[13]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  MINFLUX nanoscopy delivers 3D multicolor nanometer resolution in cells , 2020, Nature Methods.

[14]  Prabhakar R. Gudla,et al.  Transcriptional Bursting and Co-bursting Regulation by Steroid Hormone Release Pattern and Transcription Factor Mobility. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[15]  M. Sasai,et al.  Organization of fast and slow chromatin revealed by single-nucleosome dynamics , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  C. Jarzynski,et al.  Power-law behavior of transcription factor dynamics at the single-molecule level implies a continuum affinity model. , 2021, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  H. Kimura,et al.  Single nucleosome imaging reveals loose genome chromatin networks via active RNA polymerase II , 2019, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  Davit A. Potoyan,et al.  Anomalous diffusion, spatial coherence, and viscoelasticity from the energy landscape of human chromosomes , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  James M. Ward,et al.  BRG1 governs glucocorticoid receptor interactions with chromatin and pioneer factors across the genome , 2018, eLife.

[20]  M. Tomita,et al.  Dynamic organization of chromatin domains revealed by super-resolution live-cell imaging , 2017 .

[21]  G. Hager,et al.  Single-molecule analysis of steroid receptor and cofactor action in living cells , 2017, Nature Communications.

[22]  S. Mochrie,et al.  Systems-level approach to uncovering diffusive states and their transitions from single-particle trajectories. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[23]  I. Goldstein,et al.  Steroid Receptors Reprogram FoxA1 Occupancy through Dynamic Chromatin Transitions , 2016, Cell.

[24]  G. Hager,et al.  DNA binding triggers tetramerization of the glucocorticoid receptor in live cells , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Peter K. Koo,et al.  Extracting Diffusive States of Rho GTPase in Live Cells: Towards In Vivo Biochemistry , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Structural Modeling of GR Interactions with the SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complex and C/EBP. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Dylan J. Taatjes,et al.  The Mediator complex: a central integrator of transcription , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[28]  I. Rogatsky,et al.  Minireview: nuclear receptor coregulators of the p160 family: insights into inflammation and metabolism. , 2015, Molecular endocrinology.

[29]  J. J. Macklin,et al.  A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[30]  Andrey G. Cherstvy,et al.  Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: non-stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[31]  J. McNally,et al.  Single molecule analysis of transcription factor binding at transcription sites in live cells , 2014, Nature Communications.

[32]  Anders K. Haakonsson,et al.  PPARγ and the global map of adipogenesis and beyond , 2014, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[33]  S. Mandrup,et al.  Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ and C/EBPα Synergistically Activate Key Metabolic Adipocyte Genes by Assisted Loading , 2013, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[34]  Ty C. Voss,et al.  Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  D. Weitz,et al.  Micron-scale coherence in interphase chromatin dynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Victor V Lobanenkov,et al.  A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redefines the CTCF code. , 2013, Cell reports.

[37]  J. McNally,et al.  A benchmark for chromatin binding measurements in live cells , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Johan Elf,et al.  The lac Repressor Displays Facilitated Diffusion in Living Cells , 2012, Science.

[39]  S. Mandrup,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms and Genome-Wide Aspects of PPAR Subtype Specific Transactivation , 2010, PPAR research.

[40]  D. Picard,et al.  Molecular chaperones, essential partners of steroid hormone receptors for activity and mobility. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[41]  Ralf Jungmann,et al.  Quantitative analysis of single particle trajectories: mean maximal excursion method. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Andrej Kosmrlj,et al.  How a protein searches for its site on DNA: the mechanism of facilitated diffusion , 2009 .

[43]  Y. Garini,et al.  Transient anomalous diffusion of telomeres in the nucleus of mammalian cells. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[44]  M. Tokunaga,et al.  Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[45]  G. Hager,et al.  Ligand-Specific Dynamics of the Androgen Receptor at Its Response Element in Living Cells , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[46]  Cem Elbi,et al.  Ligand-Specific Dynamics of the Progesterone Receptor in Living Cells and during Chromatin Remodeling In Vitro , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[47]  J. Marko,et al.  How do site-specific DNA-binding proteins find their targets? , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  S. Khorasanizadeh,et al.  Nuclear-receptor interactions on DNA-response elements. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[49]  W. Wahli,et al.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: insight into multiple cellular functions. , 2000, Mutation research.

[50]  G. Hager,et al.  Using inducible vectors to study intracellular trafficking of GFP-tagged steroid/nuclear receptors in living cells. , 1999, Methods.

[51]  G. Hager,et al.  Differential localization and activity of the A- and B-forms of the human progesterone receptor using green fluorescent protein chimeras. , 1999, Molecular endocrinology.

[52]  D. Grier,et al.  Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies , 1996 .

[53]  Michael Ghil,et al.  Statistical significance test for transition matrices of atmospheric Markov chains , 1990 .

[54]  L. Lucy.  An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions , 1974 .

[55]  A. Upadhyaya,et al.  Biophysical Techniques to Study B Cell Activation: Single-Molecule Imaging and Force Measurements. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[56]  Michael Lehrke,et al.  The many faces of PPARgamma. , 2005, Cell.

[57]  F. Wondisford,et al.  An intact DNA-binding domain is not required for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) binding and activation on some PPAR response elements. , 2005, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[58]  B. Spiegelman,et al.  C/EBPalpha induces adipogenesis through PPARgamma: a unified pathway. , 2002, Genes & development.

[59]  William H. Richardson,et al.  Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration , 1972 .