Principles of Transactive Computer- Supported Collaboration Scripts

Armin Weinberger Professor, Saarland University, Germany. a.weinberger@mx.uni-saarland.de English abstract Parts of the classroom of the future may be built online allowing for computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). A central challenge in CSCL is a lack of transactivity, i.e., learners have problems building on the reasoning of their peers. A means of fostering CSCL are scripts that specify, sequence, and distribute roles and activities among a group of (online) learners. This article identifies five instructional design principles that explain script effects and inform script design: 1) regulation of learning activities; 2) complementary procedural knowledge; 3) process-oriented instruction; 4) substitution of coordination efforts; and 5) awareness induction.

[1]  Hans Spada,et al.  Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication , 2005 .

[2]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[3]  N. Kerr Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[4]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  Elaborating New Arguments Through a CSCL Script , 2003 .

[5]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[6]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[7]  W. Jochems,et al.  The Effect of Functional Roles on Group Efficiency , 2004 .

[8]  Daniel Bodemer,et al.  Knowledge awareness in CSCL: A psychological perspective , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[10]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  Learning to collaborate while being scripted or by observing a model , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[11]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Beat Doebeli Honegger,et al.  Over-computing CSCL macro scripts? gaining flexibility by using WikiPlus instead of specialized tools for authoring macro scripts , 2009, CSCL.

[13]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning , 2007, Learning and Instruction.

[14]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not) , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[16]  Aemilian Hron,et al.  Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen , 1997 .

[17]  F. Fischer,et al.  Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning , 2005 .

[18]  E. Cohen Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[19]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL , 2007 .

[20]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[21]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[22]  Friedrich W. Hesse,et al.  Discussion: Being Told to Do Something or Just Being Aware of Something? An Alternative Approach to Scripting in CSCL , 2007 .

[23]  Alieke Mattia van Dijk,et al.  Scripting Collaborative Drawing in Elementary Education , 2011 .

[24]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[26]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[27]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[28]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[29]  D. Perkins Person plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning , 1994 .

[30]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Workspace Awareness in Real-Time Distributed Groupware: Framework, Widgets, and Evaluation , 1996, BCS HCI.

[31]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[32]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[33]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Mediated Learning Environments with Cooperation Scripts , 2005 .

[34]  Stephanie D. Teasley Talking about reasoning : How important is the peer in peer collaboration? , 1997 .

[35]  F. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment , 2007 .