Review of top of rail friction modifier tribology

The aim of this paper was to review the current state of research for top of rail friction modifiers (TORFM). In the railway industry, friction modifiers is a catch all term for a wide range of products applied for different purposes which has led to confusion. It is hoped that recently published definitions will aid industry to a better understanding of the different products and how they function. The benefits of friction modifiers are well understood with a large body of research supporting the benefits. Comparatively, there is a lot less knowledge of the optimum amount of product to achieve the benefits or how far down the track from an application site the benefit will be seen. Modelling of the products is another area where there is little research, with most of the modelling papers found focussing on dry wheel–rail contact due to the complexity of introducing a third-body layer to a friction force model. Furthermore, only one paper was found which relates how friction modifiers are affected by contaminants or other applied products such as lubricants. With many different products applied to wheels and rail for different purposes, understanding their interaction is key. At the time of this review, there are currently no standards that prescribe how TORFM should behave although the European Committee for Standardisation is currently developing them at the moment. This review has also attempted to appraise the research against a set of criteria. Depending on how many of the criteria the piece of research filled, it was categorised as A, B or C. It was found that most of the research was of category, this was mainly due to only one test method being used or the scale presented. Category A research incorporated modelling or multiple test-scales to support the results presented.

[1]  Donald T. Eadie,et al.  Rail grade selection and friction management: a combined approach for optimising rail–wheel contact , 2013 .

[2]  Yi Zhu,et al.  Adhesion in the wheel-rail contact under contaminated conditions , 2011 .

[3]  R Lewis,et al.  Wear at the wheel/rail interface when sanding is used to increase adhesion , 2006 .

[4]  Xin Lu,et al.  Wayside gauge face lubrication: How much do we really understand? , 2013 .

[5]  Roger Lewis,et al.  Wheel and rail wear—Understanding the effects of water and grease , 2014 .

[6]  Roger Lewis,et al.  The effect of friction modifiers on wheel/rail isolation at low axle loads , 2014 .

[7]  O Arias-Cuevas,et al.  Laboratory investigation of some sanding parameters to improve the adhesion in leaf-contaminated wheel—rail contacts , 2010 .

[8]  Martin Hartl,et al.  Influence of sanding parameters on adhesion recovery in contaminated wheel–rail contact , 2015 .

[9]  E. A. Gallardo-Hernández,et al.  Effect of oil and water mixtures on adhesion in the wheel/rail contact , 2009 .

[10]  J. Casselgren,et al.  Measurements of friction coefficients between rails lubricated with a friction modifier and the wheels of an IORE locomotive during real working conditions , 2015 .

[11]  R. Dwyer-Joyce,et al.  Effect of contaminants on wear, fatigue and traction , 2009 .

[12]  U. Olofsson,et al.  Mapping rail wear regimes and transitions , 2004 .

[13]  Donald T. Eadie,et al.  Top-of-rail friction control for curve noise mitigation and corrugation rate reduction , 2006 .

[14]  R. Popovici Friction in wheel-rail contacts , 2010 .

[15]  A. Polycarpou,et al.  Correlation between laboratory ball-on-disk and full-scale rail performance tests , 2011 .

[16]  E. A. Gallardo-Hernández,et al.  Twin disc assessment of wheel/rail adhesion , 2008 .

[17]  U. Olofsson,et al.  Low adhesion due to oxide formation in the presence of salt , 2014 .

[18]  Zili Li,et al.  A laboratory investigation on the influence of the particle size and slip during sanding on the adhesion and wear in the wheel–rail contact , 2011 .

[19]  Yoshihiro Suda,et al.  Development of onboard friction control , 2005 .

[20]  Rickard Nilsson,et al.  Effect of the presence of moisture at the wheel–rail interface during dew and damp conditions , 2017 .

[21]  Masao Tomeoka,et al.  Friction control between wheel and rail by means of on-board lubrication , 2002 .

[22]  R Lewis,et al.  Static wheel/rail contact isolation due to track contamination , 2003 .

[23]  Walter Sextro,et al.  Friction in wheel--rail contact: A model comprising interfacial fluids, surface roughness and temperature , 2011 .

[24]  F. Franklin,et al.  Laboratory simulation of low-adhesion leaf film on rail steel , 2008 .

[25]  E. A. Gallardo-Hernández,et al.  Rolling–Sliding Laboratory Tests of Friction Modifiers in Leaf Contaminated Wheel–Rail Contacts , 2008 .

[26]  O. Arias-Cuevas,et al.  Investigating the Lubricity and Electrical Insulation Caused by Sanding in Dry Wheel–Rail Contacts , 2010 .

[27]  Yi Zhu,et al.  A field test study of leaf contamination on railhead surfaces , 2014 .

[28]  Oyelayo O. Ajayi,et al.  Investigation of Top of Rail Lubrication and Laser Glazing for Improved Railroad Energy Efficiency , 2003 .

[29]  Zili Li,et al.  Rolling–sliding laboratory tests of friction modifiers in dry and wet wheel–rail contacts , 2010 .

[30]  Kosuke Matsumoto,et al.  The optimum design of an onboard friction control system between wheel and rail in a railway system for improved curving negotiation , 2006 .

[31]  Roger Lewis,et al.  Assessment of railway curve lubricant performance using a twin-disc tester , 2014 .

[32]  Donald T. Eadie,et al.  Laboratory study of the tribological properties of friction modifier thin films for friction control at the wheel/rail interface , 2005 .

[33]  Joe Kalousek,et al.  The role of high positive friction (HPF) modifier in the control of short pitch corrugations and related phenomena , 2002 .

[34]  Ulf Sellgren,et al.  Pin-on-disc study of the effects of railway friction modifiers on airborne wear particles from wheel , 2013 .

[35]  Yves Berthier,et al.  Presence and role of the third body in a wheel–rail contact , 2005 .

[36]  J Kalousek,et al.  An Investigation of Short Pitch Wheel and Rail Corrugations on the Vancouver Mass Transit System , 1992 .

[37]  Rob Dwyer-Joyce,et al.  Tribology of the Wheel-Rail Contact: The Effect of Third Body Materials , 2012 .

[38]  E. Vollebregt,et al.  Numerical modeling of measured railway creep versus creep-force curves with CONTACT , 2014 .

[39]  U. Olofsson,et al.  Effect of humidity, temperature and railhead contamination on the performance of friction modifiers: Pin-on-disk study , 2013 .

[40]  Xin Lu,et al.  A new method for the assessment of traction enhancers and the generation of organic layers in a twin-disc machine , 2016 .

[41]  S. Kumar,et al.  Wheel-Rail Wear and Adhesion With and Without Sand for a North American Locomotive , 1986 .

[42]  R. Lewis,et al.  Third body layer—experimental results and a model describing its influence on the traction coefficient , 2014 .

[43]  R. Lewis,et al.  Investigation of the isolation and frictional properties of hydrophobic products on the rail head, when used to combat low adhesion , 2014 .

[44]  Richard Reiff,et al.  Implementation of Wayside Top of Rail Friction Control on North American Heavy Haul Freight Railways , 2006 .

[45]  Stuart L. Grassie,et al.  Rail corrugation: advances in measurement, understanding and treatment , 2005 .

[46]  Joe Kalousek,et al.  Railway noise and the effect of top of rail liquid friction modifiers: changes in sound and vibration spectral distributions in curves , 2005 .

[47]  Yasutomo Sone,et al.  Assessment of lubricant applied to wheel/rail interface in curves , 2014 .

[48]  A. Meierhofer A new Wheel-Rail Creep Force Model based On Elasto-Plastic Third Body Layers , 2018 .

[49]  R. Stock,et al.  The effects of top of rail friction modifier on wear and rolling contact fatigue : Full-scale rail-wheel test rig evaluation, analysis and modelling , 2008 .

[50]  Yasuhiro Sato,et al.  Creep force characteristics between rail and wheel on scaled model , 2002 .

[51]  Xin Lu,et al.  Friction management on a Chinese heavy haul coal line , 2012 .

[52]  I. J. McEwen,et al.  WHEEL/RAIL ADHESION-BOUNDARY LUBRICATION BY OILY FLUIDS , 1975 .

[53]  Donald T. Eadie,et al.  Influencing rolling contact fatigue through top of rail friction modifier application – A full scale wheel–rail test rig study , 2011 .

[54]  J. Song,et al.  Experimental study on adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under dry and water conditions , 2011 .

[55]  Minhao Zhu,et al.  Influence of friction modifiers on improving adhesion and surface damage of wheel/rail under low adhesion conditions , 2014 .

[56]  R. Lewis,et al.  Material concepts for top of rail friction management - Classification, characterisation and application , 2016 .

[57]  Francis Franklin,et al.  Rail surface fatigue and wear , 2009 .

[58]  J. J. Kalker,et al.  A Fast Algorithm for the Simplified Theory of Rolling Contact , 1982 .

[59]  Philippa Cann,et al.  The “leaves on the line” problem—a study of leaf residue film formation and lubricity under laboratory test conditions , 2006 .

[60]  Gopi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Development of effective performance measures for wayside rail curve lubrication in heavy haul lines , 2014 .

[61]  Gopi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Development of Wear-Fatigue-Lubrication-Interaction Model for Cost Effective Rail Maintenance Decisions , 2006 .

[62]  Yasushi Oka,et al.  Field studies of the effect of friction modifiers on short pitch corrugation generation in curves , 2008 .

[63]  Ulf Olofsson,et al.  Basic tribology of the wheel-rail contact , 2009 .

[64]  Gabor Müller,et al.  Physical processes in wheel–rail contact and its implications on vehicle–track interaction , 2015 .