Technological imperatives in the internationalization process

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine how a firm's leading-edge technology affects the way international business is conducted. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents the issues faced by high-tech, small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from New Zealand in the internationalization process. Since the research is anchored within a realism framework, case studies and semi-structured in-depth interviews were applied. Findings - The research suggests that current foreign activities result in a stream of indicators closely related to the firm's technology, which are instrumental in shaping and driving future international activities. The paper demonstrates that firms tend to be influenced by the entry decisions made by other firms in the same/similar industry targeting the same market; and that a firm's technological capabilities and the advantages of specialized knowledge act as the constraints in the development of the firm's future international strategy. Practical implications - The paper helps to increase the understanding of how lack of foreign market knowledge can be perceived as an obstacle to carrying out international business. Originality/value - The paper presents the internationalization process as a dynamic process in an approach which is an extension of past thinking. However, past research has been motivated by generalizing findings across firms, to understand shared patterns in the process of internationalization. This approach overlooks the unique distinctiveness of firms in different sectors and contexts where idiosyncratic behavior is the norm rather than the exception to the rule.

[1]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms , 1997 .

[2]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Mechanism of Internationalisation , 1990 .

[3]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[4]  Jean-Luc Arregle,et al.  Mode of international entry: The advantages of multilevel methods , 2006 .

[5]  Daphne W. Yiu,et al.  The Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary: An Institutional Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Jonathan L Calof,et al.  Adapting to foreign markets: Explaining internationalization , 1995 .

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[8]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Knowledge, Market Failure and the Multinational Enterprise: A Reply , 1995 .

[9]  B. Elango,et al.  Building capabilities for international operations through networks: a study of Indian firms , 2007 .

[10]  Svante Andersson,et al.  The Internationalization of the Firm from an Entrepreneurial Perspective , 2000 .

[11]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[12]  Jane Lu,et al.  Intra- and Inter-organizational Imitative Behavior: Institutional Influences on Japanese Firms' Entry Mode Choice , 2002 .

[13]  N. Coviello The network dynamics of international new ventures , 2006 .

[14]  Henrik Agndal,et al.  The impact of relationships on changes in internationalisation strategies of SMEs , 2007 .

[15]  Ø. Moen,et al.  Born Global or Gradual Global? Examining the Export Behavior of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2002 .

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[17]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  A Comparison of International and Domestic New Ventures , 2003 .

[18]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[19]  Ari Jantunen,et al.  Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: The role of technological capabilities and appropriability , 2011 .

[20]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[21]  B. Kogut The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[22]  P. Buckley,et al.  Going international : the experience of smaller companies overseas , 1978 .

[23]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[24]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model : a critical review , 2002 .

[25]  M. Erramilli,et al.  Entry Mode Choice in Service Industries , 1990 .

[26]  B. Lukas,et al.  Entry Mode Decisions: The Role of Managers' Mental Models , 1997 .

[27]  P. Ellis,et al.  Social Ties and Foreign Market Entry , 2000 .

[28]  Jim Bell,et al.  Rapid internationalisation among entrepreneurial firms in Australia, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand: An extension to the network approach , 2006 .

[29]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[30]  A. O'Cass,et al.  Does Industry Matter? Examining the Role of Industry Structure and Organizational Learning in Innovation and Brand Performance , 2006 .

[31]  N. Coviello,et al.  Growing the entrepreneurial firm , 1995 .

[32]  D. Teece Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[33]  J. Bisman The critical realist paradigm as an approach to research in accounting , 2002 .

[34]  Bent Petersen,et al.  The Internet and Foreign Market Expansion by Firms , 2002 .

[35]  N. Piercy Export strategy, markets and competition , 1982 .

[36]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[37]  Helmut Fryges Internationalisation of technology-oriented firms in Germany and the UK , 2009 .

[38]  G. Valentini,et al.  Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs’ growth , 2011 .

[39]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[40]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Boundaries of the Firm: Insights From International Entry Mode Research , 2007 .

[41]  James M. Carman,et al.  Growth strategies for service firms , 1980 .

[42]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[43]  Sylvie K. Chetty,et al.  Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: a network approach , 2000 .

[44]  J. Johanson,et al.  THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE FIRM — FOUR SWEDISH CASES , 1975 .

[45]  S. Shane,et al.  Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research , 1994 .

[46]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Ownership-Based Entry Mode Strategies and International Performance , 1994 .

[47]  L. Welch,et al.  The Internationalization Process and Networks: A Strategic Management Perspective , 1996 .

[48]  C. Perry Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing , 1998 .

[49]  Ivo Zander,et al.  The formation of international innovation networks in the multinational corporation: an evolutionary perspective , 2002 .

[50]  Joseph E. Stiglitz,et al.  Economic policy and technological performance: Learning to learn, localized learning and technological progress , 1987 .

[51]  Kalevi Kyläheiko,et al.  Organisational capabilities and internationalisation of the small and medium-sized information and communications technology firms , 2010 .

[52]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[53]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  First insights into export sales forecasting practice: a qualitative study , 1996 .

[54]  J. Dunning The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity , 2000 .

[55]  Homin Chen,et al.  Network Linkages and Location Choice in Foreign Direct Investment , 1998 .

[56]  D. Mcfetridge Knowledge, Market Failure and the Multinational Enterprise: A Comment , 1995 .

[57]  A. Madhok How much does ownership really matter? Equity and trust relations in joint venture relationships , 2006 .