The reorganization of the information systems of the US Naval Construction Forces: an action research project

Organization change is a difficult task under the best of circumstances. Change dictated from outside the organization makes a reorganization project even more difficult. This study follows the information systems reorganization of the US Naval Construction Forces whose restructuring was directed as a result of budget cuts and military ‘right-sizing’. The process was conducted through the use of action research, an intensive investigative method seeing limited use in information system's research. This method directly involves the researcher in the organizational change effort while placing organization members in close collaboration with the researcher. The study describes the action research methodology while illustrating the research strategy in phases and recounts the successful migration from a highly centralised to a decentralised organization.

[1]  P. Checkland.  From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[2]  Roger Bennett,et al.  How to Get the Best from Action Research — A Guidebook , 1988 .

[3]  F. Lau,et al.  A review on the use of action research in information systems studies , 1997 .

[4]  R. Lippitt,et al.  Training in community relations , 1950 .

[5]  N. Seear,et al.  Productivity and Social Organization: The Ahmedabad Experiment. , 1959 .

[6]  Paul R. Lawrence,et al.  Changing the Structure and Functioning of an Organization: Report of a Field Experiment.Stanley E. Seashore , David G. Bowers , 1964 .

[7]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  New Trends in the Investigation of Prejudice , 1946 .

[8]  Tudor Rickards.  Making new things happen: an interpretation of observed innovation strategies , 1985 .

[9]  William A. Pasmore,et al.  An Action-Research Program for Increasing Employee Involvement in Problem Solving. , 1982 .

[10]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Developing end-users' systems development competence: An exploratory study , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[11]  M. Hult,et al.  TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .

[12]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research as a Process and as a Goal , 1993 .

[13]  Richard Baskerville.  Semantic database prototypes , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  N. C. Morse,et al.  The experimental change of a major organizational variable. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  R. Brandis.  The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[16]  Larry A. Pace,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[17]  W. Whyte.  Advancing scientific knowledge through participatory action research , 1989 .

[18]  L. McKay.  Overcoming resistance to change. , 1993, Canadian journal of nursing administration.

[19]  Philip H. Mirvis,et al.  Systems are not solutions: Issues in creating information systems that account for the human organization , 1983 .

[20]  K. Hambridge.  Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[21]  M. Hugentobler,et al.  Conducting Action Research: Relationships between Organization Members and Researchers , 1992 .

[22]  Richard Baskerville.  Deferring Generalizability: Four Classes of Generalization in Social Enquir , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[24]  W. M. Fox.  Sociotechnical System Principles and Guidelines: Past and Present , 1995 .

[25]  J. Roggema,et al.  Organizational Change in the Shipping Industry: Issues in the Transformation of Basic Assumptions , 1983 .

[26]  R. Rapoport.  Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[27]  Calvin Pava,et al.  Redesigning Sociotechnical Systems Design: Concepts and Methods for the 1990s , 1986 .

[28]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[29]  F. Emery,et al.  The psychological dynamics of smoking , 1968 .

[30]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  Participant Observer Research: An Activist Role , 1991 .

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Bengt Stymne,et al.  Organization Design for Technological Change , 1990 .

[33]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[34]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Action Learning for Teaching Information Systems , 1983, Computer/law journal.

[35]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[36]  J. Cunningham.  Action Research and Organizational Development , 1993 .

[37]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[38]  Åke Sandberg,et al.  SOCIO-TECHNICAL DESIGN , TRADE UNION STRATEGIES AND ACTION RESEARCH , 2000 .

[39]  J. F. Clark,et al.  The Changing Culture of a Factory , 1951, Mental Health.

[40]  Richard E. Walton,et al.  Research, Action, and Participation , 1989 .

[41]  Eric Trist.  Engaging with Large-Scale Systems , 1976 .

[42]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .