Patient-specific model of brain deformation: application to medical image registration.

This contribution presents finite element computation of the deformation field within the brain during craniotomy-induced brain shift. The results were used to illustrate the capabilities of non-linear (i.e. accounting for both geometric and material non-linearities) finite element analysis in non-rigid registration of pre- and intra-operative magnetic resonance images of the brain. We used patient-specific hexahedron-dominant finite element mesh, together with realistic material properties for the brain tissue and appropriate contact conditions at boundaries. The model was loaded by the enforced motion of nodes (i.e. through prescribed motion of a boundary) at the brain surface in the craniotomy area. We suggest using explicit time-integration scheme for discretised equations of motion, as the computational times are much shorter and accuracy, for practical purposes, the same as in the case of implicit integration schemes. Application of the computed deformation field to register (i.e. align) the pre-operative images with the intra-operative ones indicated that the model very accurately predicts the displacements of the tumour and the lateral ventricles even for limited information about the brain surface deformation. The prediction accuracy improves when information about deformation of not only exposed (during craniotomy) but also unexposed parts of the brain surface is used when prescribing loading. However, it appears that the accuracy achieved using information only about the deformation of the exposed surface, that can be determined without intra-operative imaging, is acceptable. The presented results show that non-linear biomechanical models can complement medical image processing techniques when conducting non-rigid registration. Important advantage of such models over the previously used linear ones is that they do not require unrealistic assumptions that brain deformations are infinitesimally small and brain stress-strain relationship is linear.

[1]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Registration of 3-d intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite-element biomechanical model , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Registration of 3D Intraoperative MR Images of the Brain Using a Finite Element Biomechanical Model , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures , 1991 .

[5]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Robert L. Galloway,et al.  Cortical surface registration for image-guided neurosurgery using laser-range scanning , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  William Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit: An Object-Oriented Approach to 3-D Graphics , 1997 .

[8]  Steven S. Beauchemin,et al.  The computation of optical flow , 1995, CSUR.

[9]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Real-Time Biomechanical Simulation of Volumetric Brain Deformation for Image Guided Neurosurgery , 2000, ACM/IEEE SC 2000 Conference (SC'00).

[10]  Karol Miller,et al.  Brain Shift Computation Using a Fully Nonlinear Biomechanical Model , 2005, MICCAI.

[11]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[12]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  F. Lindseth,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of a 3D ultrasound-based neuronavigation system. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[14]  O. Skrinjar,et al.  A stereo-guided biomechanical model for volumetric deformation analysis , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[15]  Haiying Liu,et al.  Constructing Patient Specific Models for Correcting Intraoperative Brain Deformation , 2001, MICCAI.

[16]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Brain shift estimation in image-guided neurosurgery using 3-D ultrasound , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Zeike A. Taylor,et al.  Towards computing brain deformations for diagnosis, prognosis and neurosurgical simulation , 2005 .

[18]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Patient-Specific Biomechanical Model of the Brain: Application to Parkinson's Disease Procedure , 2003, IS4TH.

[19]  Howard A Rowley,et al.  The use of quick-brain magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of shunt-treated hydrocephalus. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[20]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  The visualization toolkit (2nd ed.): an object-oriented approach to 3D graphics , 1998 .

[21]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A survey of numerical methods and computer programs for dynamic structural analysis , 1976 .

[22]  Joachim Dengler,et al.  The Dynamic Pyramid - a Model for Motion Analysis with Controlled Continuity , 1988, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[23]  L. P. Bindeman,et al.  Assumed strain stabilization of the eight node hexahedral element , 1993 .

[24]  K Miller,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Karol Miller,et al.  Method of testing very soft biological tissues in compression. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  John C. Brewer,et al.  EFFECTS OF ANGLES AND OFFSETS IN CRASH SIMULATIONS OF AUTOMOBILES WITH LIGHT TRUCKS , 2001 .

[27]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Serial registration of intraoperative MR images of the brain , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  Wieslaw Lucjan Nowinski,et al.  Talairach-Tournoux brain atlas registration using a metalforming principle-based finite element method , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[29]  H. Saunders Book Reviews : NUMERICAL METHODS IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS K.-J. Bathe and E.L. Wilson Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , 1978 .

[30]  Robert Dewar,et al.  Non-linear dynamics , 2000 .

[31]  Kenneth J. Waldron,et al.  Kinematics, dynamics, and design of machinery , 1998 .

[32]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The "subdural" space: a new look at an outdated concept. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[33]  F. Lindseth,et al.  Accuracy Evaluation of a 3D Ultrasound-Based Neuronavigation System , 2002 .

[34]  Karol Miller Biomechanics without mechanics: calculating soft tissue deformation without differential equations of equilibrium , 2004 .

[35]  K. Rohr,et al.  Biomechanical modeling of the human head for physically based, nonrigid image registration , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  D M Long,et al.  The operating room of the future. , 1999, Neurological research.

[37]  J. J. Moré,et al.  Quasi-Newton Methods, Motivation and Theory , 1974 .

[38]  G. R. Liu,et al.  1013 Mesh Free Methods : Moving beyond the Finite Element Method , 2003 .

[39]  Karol Miller,et al.  Computing Reaction Forces on Surgical Tools for Robotic Neurosurgery and Surgical Simulation , 2004 .

[40]  Guirong Liu Mesh Free Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method , 2002 .

[41]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Capturing intraoperative deformations: research experience at Brigham and Women's hospital , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[42]  J. Caffrey,et al.  Virtual Reality Neurosurgery: A Simulator Blueprint , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[43]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  A Binary Entropy Measure to Assess Nonrigid Registration Algorithms , 2001, MICCAI.

[44]  S W Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evaluation of passenger rail vehicle crashworthiness , 2001 .

[45]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Computational Methods for Transient Analysis , 1985 .