A chemostat model of resource competition and allelopathy

Presented is a chemostat model in which one microbial population excretes a poison that increases the mortality of another, with toxin production increasing as the growth rate of the toxic species decreases. The model is intended to explore the role of allelopathy in blooms of harmful algae, such as red tide (Karenia brevis) and golden algae (Prymnesium parvum). This study introduces the model and its biological basis, and proceeds to the analysis of its asymptotic states. All theoretical results are supported by a set of numerical simulations. A discussion of biological conclusions and similarities to other mathematical models is also presented.

[1]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  Competition in the chemostat when one competitor produces a toxin , 1998 .

[2]  T. A. Villareal,et al.  Does the red tide dinoflagellate Karenia brevis use allelopathy to outcompete other phytoplankton? , 2005 .

[3]  J P Braselton,et al.  A competition model with dynamically allocated inhibitor production. , 2001, Mathematical biosciences.

[4]  Charles R. Goldman,et al.  Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton growth in the freshwaters of North America : a review and critique of experimental enrichments , 1990 .

[5]  R. Lenski,et al.  Coexistence of two competitors on one resource and one inhibitor: a chemostat model based on bacteria and antibiotics. , 1986, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  R. Callaway,et al.  Novel Weapons: Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability , 2004 .

[7]  S. Lehtinen,et al.  Relative importance of the different negative effects of the toxic haptophyte Prymnesium parvum on Rhodomonas salina and Brachionus plicatilis , 2005 .

[8]  Balram Dubey,et al.  A model for the allelopathic effect on two competing species , 2000 .

[9]  J. Huisman,et al.  Allelopathic interactions between phytoplankton species: The roles of heterotrophic bacteria and mixing intensity , 2004 .

[10]  R. Lenski,et al.  Chemical warfare from an ecological perspective , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[12]  J. Monod,et al.  Thetechnique of continuous culture. , 1950 .

[13]  T. Yasumoto,et al.  The structure elucidation and biological activities ofhigh molecular weight algal toxins: maitotoxin, prymnesins andzooxanthellatoxins , 2000 .

[14]  Paul Waltman,et al.  The Theory of the Chemostat: Dynamics of Microbial Competition , 1995 .

[15]  Paul Waltman,et al.  A survey of mathematical models of competition with an inhibitor. , 2004, Mathematical biosciences.

[16]  S. Hsu,et al.  Competition in the presence of a lethal external inhibitor. , 2000, Mathematical biosciences.

[17]  J. Grover.  Phosphorus-dependent growth kinetics of 11 species of freshwater algae , 1989 .

[18]  Catherine Legrand,et al.  Allelopathic effect of Prymnesium parvum on a natural plankton community , 2003 .

[19]  B. Levin.  Frequency-dependent selection in bacterial populations. , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  Gail S. K. Wolkowicz,et al.  Global dynamics of a mathematical model of competition in the chemostat: general response functions and differential death rates , 1992 .

[21]  A. G. Fredrickson,et al.  Inhibition as a Factor in the Maintenance of the Diversity of Microbial Ecosystems , 1978 .

[22]  Joydev Chattopadhyay,et al.  Nutrient-limited toxin production and the dynamics of two phytoplankton in culture media: A mathematical model , 2008 .

[23]  David Tilman,et al.  Phytoplankton Community Ecology: The Role of Limiting Nutrients , 1982 .

[24]  J. Grover.  Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to Monod's Model , 1990, The American Naturalist.