From Noncompetence to Exceptional Talent: Exploring the Range of Academic Achievement Within and Between Grade Levels

This article analyzes the magnitude of individual differences in academic achievement and their growth over the first 9 years of schooling. The author anchors the widening-gap phenomenon on the theoretical recognition of large individual differences in learning pace, which logically leads over time to an increasing gap in knowledge and skills between the fastest and slowest learners. The achievement data used as evidence were borrowed from the developmental standard score (SS) norms of the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS; Hoover, Dunbar, & Frisbie, 2001). These norms reveal, among other things, that within most grade levels the range between the lowest and highest achievers exceeds the 8-year gap in knowledge between average 1st- and 9th-grade students. Moreover, the achievement gap widens by about 145% between grades 1 and 9. Parallel evidence suggests that standardized achievement test data probably underestimate the true differences. Because it ensues from stable individual differences in learning aptitude, educators should not perceive that widening achievement gap as a failure of the educational system, but should recognize it instead as a proof that all learners are given the opportunity to progress at their own learning pace.

[1]  A. Jensen Spearman's g and the Problem of Educational Equality , 1991 .

[2]  J. Green The Psychology of Education , 1911, Nature.

[3]  Francis X. Archambault,et al.  Regular Classroom Practices with Gifted Students: Results of a National Survey of Classroom Teachers. Research Monograph 93102. , 1993 .

[4]  J. Cox,et al.  Educating Able Learners: Programs and Promising Practices , 1985 .

[5]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[6]  A. Biemiller Lake Wobegon Revisited: On Diversity and Education , 1993 .

[7]  Robert B. Davis,et al.  The Gifted and the Creative: A Fifty-Year Perspective , 1977 .

[8]  C. Myers Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[9]  David F. Lohman,et al.  Minding our p's and q's: On finding relationships between learning and intelligence. , 1999 .

[10]  W. M. Yen Normative Growth Expectations Must Be Realistic: A Response to Phillips and Clarizio. , 1988 .

[11]  W. M. Yen,et al.  Comparison of Item Response Theory and Thurstone Methods of Vertical Scaling , 1997 .

[12]  L. Thompson,et al.  Genetic Tools for Exploring Individual Differences in Intelligence , 2000 .

[13]  H. Mitzel,et al.  Encyclopedia of educational research , 1982 .

[14]  Maxim J. Schlossberg,et al.  Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook. , 1990 .

[15]  F. Gagné Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory1 , 2004 .

[16]  H. Clarizio,et al.  Limitations of Standard Scores in Individual Achievement Testing , 1988 .

[17]  J. Carroll Psychometrics, intelligence, and public perception. , 1997 .

[18]  G. A. Davis,et al.  Handbook of Gifted Education , 1991 .

[19]  B. McInnes Adapting instruction to individual differences. , 1970, The Canadian nurse.

[20]  F. Gagné A Proposal for Subcategories Within Gifted or Talented Populations , 1998 .

[21]  Griffin,et al.  Eighty-Second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education , 2005 .

[22]  W. A. Nicewander,et al.  Grade Equivalent and IRT Representations of Growth , 1997 .

[23]  J. Ormrod Educational Psychology : Developing Learners , 1997 .

[24]  John P. Keeves,et al.  Educational research, methodology and measurement : an international handbook , 1988 .

[25]  M. Porath Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory—a response , 2004 .

[26]  S. Reis Why Not Let High Ability Students Start School in January? The Curriculum Compacting Study. Research Monograph 93106. , 1993 .

[27]  R. Linn Educational measurement, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[28]  H. D. Hoover Growth Expectations for Low‐Achieving Students: A Reply to Yen , 1988 .

[29]  L. Gottfredson Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life , 1997 .

[30]  Richard D. Roberts,et al.  Learning and Individual Differences: Process, Trait and Content Determinants , 1999 .

[31]  H. D. Hoover The Most Appropriate Scores for Measuring Educational Development in the Elementary Schools: GE's , 1984 .

[32]  Elliot W. Eisner,et al.  The kind of schools we need , 2002 .

[33]  V. Zanden,et al.  Educational Psychology: In Theory and Practice , 1980 .