Comparison of flap adhesion strength using the Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Emilio Balestrazzi,et al. Comparison of Corneal Aberration Changes After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Performed With Mechanical Microkeratome and IntraLase Femtosecond Laser: 1-Year Follow-up , 2008, Cornea.
[2] Hyun-jeung Choi,et al. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[3] S. Schallhorn,et al. Stability of the laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flap in rabbit eyes , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.
[4] Zsolt Bor,et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: Potential impact on wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.
[5] R. Krueger,et al. Biomechanical effects of femtosecond and microkeratome-based flap creation: prospective contralateral examination of two patients. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.
[6] M. Netto,et al. Wavefront analysis comparison of LASIK outcomes with the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.
[7] Sanjay V. Patel,et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. , 2007, Ophthalmology.
[8] D. B. Tran,et al. A 60 kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser creates a smoother LASIK stromal bed surface compared to a Zyoptix XP mechanical microkeratome in human donor eyes. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.
[9] R. Krueger,et al. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery. , 2003, Journal of refractive surgery.
[10] E. Cohen,et al. Accidental self-removal of a flap--a rare complication of laser in situ keratomileusis surgery. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.
[11] W. J. Hadden,et al. A Comparison of , 1971 .