Life cycle assessment in the telecommunication industry: A review

Background, Goal and ScopeToday, after the technologically and commercially successful breakthrough of electronic telecommunication facilities, rapid and globally untrammelled information exchange has become an indispensable service in daily life. Associated with the tremendous growth in electronic telecommunication hardware (GSMAssociation 2005), however, was and continues to be an increasing awareness of the environmental effects related to both the operation and the production, as well as the End-of-Life (EoL) treatment of such communication equipment. Environmental concerns, for example, have resulted in various governmental regulations such as the WEEE- (CEC 2003b) and the RoHS-directives (CEC 2003a).To analyse, interpret and improve the environmental performance of electronic telecommunication equipment, life cycle assessment (LCA) is increasingly recognised as one promising analytical tool. Based on a thorough review of the scientific work and by discussing industrial views, this paper is intended to determine the key milestones achieved, to analyse the current research situation and to outline the key challenges concerning LCA and electronic telecommunication industries.MethodStarting with a brief reflection of the LCA approach, the particularities in context with telecommunication products1 are discussed. Exemplary for various stakeholders participating in the supply chain of telecommunication means recent industry perspectives are also presented.ResultsIn the core section of the proposed paper, the pertinent scientific literature on LCA and electronic telecommunication means is reviewed and the most impressive achievements are documented. Particular attention is dedicated to subcomponents of individual electronic telecommunication devices (e.g. Printed Wiring Board Assemblies (PWBA) of mobile phones), components of mobile communication networks (e.g. Base Transceiver Stations (BTS)) and entire networks concentrating on product comparisons, inventory approaches, impact assessment method development, result interpretations and presentation, and usability of LCA in decision-making.DiscussionFrom the reviewed scientific literature and industry views, it was found that telecommunication products, in general, represent complex objects requiring a well thought-out performance of the LCA tool. It has been shown that today there is a lack of stakeholder involvement resulting in LCA studies which only partly fulfil the expectations of the contractors. In this spirit it was recognised, at present, that most of the LCA studies on telecommunication equipment result in bulky and stakeholder unspecific compilations of findings impossible to be used in rapid decision-making. This aspect may explain why LCA so far is not or only partly integrated into decision-making of globally integrated industries, such as in telecommunication industries.ConclusionsIn summary, it can be stated that LCA represents a promising alternative to analyse, to interpret and essentially to adjust the environmental performance of electronic telecommunication products. The review showed that there is a need to focus research efforts in order to arrive at sound improvements of the LCA methodology.PerspectivesThe conclusions from the presented review suggest concentrating in particular on further development of the LCA methodology with respect to efficiency, effectivity and flexibility. This challenge is associated with the need for LCA to be understood as a process rather than a discontinuously applicable tool, attending industrial processes, in essence to contribute to improved environmental performances of products. In this context, particular attention should be paid to proper stakeholder involvement and continuous exchange of concentrated information relevant for the respective stakeholder.

[1]  Roland Clift The ECTEL Trials , 1997 .

[2]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Heavy metal partitioning from electronic scrap during thermal End-of-Life treatment. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review , 2001 .

[4]  Anders S. G. Andrae Development of a Generic Model for Life Cycle Inventory and Environmental Assessment of Upstream Processes for Electronic Products , 2002 .

[5]  R. Clift,et al.  Relationships Between Environmental Impacts and Added Value Along the Supply Chain , 2000 .

[6]  Pernilla Gluch,et al.  The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making , 2004 .

[7]  M. Marien New communications technology: A survey of impacts and issues☆ , 1996 .

[8]  J. Malmodin,et al.  Life cycle assessment of third generation (3G) wireless telecommunication systems at Ericsson , 2001, Proceedings Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[9]  S. Ryding ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[10]  Jian-xin Yang,et al.  Life cycle assessment of mobile phone housing. , 2004, Journal of environmental sciences.

[11]  Mireille Faist Emmenegger,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of the Mobile Communication System UMTS: Towards Eco-efficient Systems (12 pp) , 2003, ISEE 2003.

[12]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[13]  E. Weidman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Ericsson third generation systems , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.00CH37082).

[14]  John Stark,et al.  Product lifecycle management : 21st century paradigm for product realisation , 2005 .

[15]  Ian Boustead,et al.  LCA — how it came about , 1996 .

[16]  Jessica Gustavsson,et al.  End-of-Life treatment of Radio Base Station transceivers in Europe, Japan and the USA : a Life Cycle Assessment study , 1999 .

[17]  Andrius Plepys,et al.  The Grey Side of ICT , 2002 .

[18]  K. Suganuma Advances in lead-free electronics soldering , 2001 .

[19]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[20]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle assessment of second generation (2G) and third generation (3G) mobile phone networks. , 2006, Environment international.

[21]  I. Boustead,et al.  Handbook of industrial energy analysis , 1979 .

[22]  Paul Fink The roots of LCA in Switzerland - Continuous learning by doing , 1997 .

[23]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Environmental Assessment of End-of-Life Treatment Options for a GSM 900 Antenna Rack (12 pp paper version/18 pp online version) , 2006 .

[24]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  Improving the overall environmental performance of existing telecommunications facilities , 2002 .

[25]  B. Fishbein Waste in the Wireless World: The Challenge of Cell Phones , 2002 .

[26]  Jun Yoshinaga,et al.  Environmental Fate of Gallium Arsenide Semiconductor Disposal , 2003 .

[27]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[28]  Pranshu Singhal,et al.  Key Environmental Performance Indicators (KEPIs): A new approach to environmental assessment , 2004 .

[29]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[30]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Conoco and the Vapor Recovery Project: Using Innovation to Preserve Autonomy , 1999 .

[31]  Financial supervision,et al.  Annual report 1995 , 1996 .

[32]  Tim Jackson,et al.  A Dynamic Life‐Cycle Energy Model of Mobile Phone Take‐back and Recycling , 1999 .

[33]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[34]  Kevin Chin Ning Tan Life cycle assessment of a mobile phone , 2005 .