Coupled Tensor Decomposition for Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion with Variability

Coupled tensor approximation has recently emerged as a promising approach for the fusion of hyperspectral and multispectral images, reconciling state of the art performance with strong theoretical guarantees. However, tensor-based approaches previously proposed assume that the different observed images are acquired under exactly the same conditions. A recent work proposed to accommodate spectral variability in the image fusion problem using a matrix factorization-based formulation, but did not account for spatially-localized variations. Moreover, it lacks theoretical guarantees and has a high associated computational complexity. In this paper, we consider the image fusion problem while accounting for both spatially and spectrally localized changes in an additive model. We first study how the general identifiability of the model is impacted by the presence of such changes. Then, assuming that the high-resolution image and the variation factors admit a Tucker decomposition, two new algorithms are proposed -- one purely algebraic, and another based on an optimization procedure. Theoretical guarantees for the exact recovery of the high-resolution image are provided for both algorithms. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods in the presence of spectral and spatial variations between the images, at a smaller computational cost.

[1]  K. C. Ho,et al.  Endmember Variability in Hyperspectral Analysis: Addressing Spectral Variability During Spectral Unmixing , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  Kejun Huang,et al.  Hyperspectral Super-Resolution: A Coupled Nonnegative Block-Term Tensor Decomposition Approach , 2019, 2019 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP).

[3]  Ricardo Augusto Borsoi,et al.  Low-Rank Tensor Modeling for Hyperspectral Unmixing Accounting for Spectral Variability , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Ricardo Augusto Borsoi,et al.  Generalized Linear Mixing Model Accounting for Endmember Variability , 2017, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[5]  Joanne C. White,et al.  A new data fusion model for high spatial- and temporal-resolution mapping of forest disturbance based on Landsat and MODIS , 2009 .

[6]  Naoto Yokoya,et al.  Hyperspectral and Multispectral Data Fusion: A comparative review of the recent literature , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[7]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[8]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Quality of high resolution synthesised images: Is there a simple criterion ? , 2000 .

[9]  Valeria Simoncini,et al.  Computational Methods for Linear Matrix Equations , 2016, SIAM Rev..

[10]  W. J. Carper,et al.  The use of intensity-hue-saturation transformations for merging SPOT panchromatic and multispectral image data , 1990 .

[11]  J. G. Liu,et al.  Smoothing Filter-based Intensity Modulation : a spectral preserve image fusion technique for improving spatial details , 2001 .

[12]  Ricardo Augusto Borsoi,et al.  A Low-Rank Tensor Regularization Strategy for Hyperspectral Unmixing , 2018, 2018 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP).

[13]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Nonnegative Tensor CP Decomposition of Hyperspectral Data , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Tim R. McVicar,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of blending Landsat–MODIS surface reflectances in two landscapes with contrasting spatial and temporal dynamics: A framework for algorithm selection , 2013 .

[15]  Caroline Fossati,et al.  Denoising of Hyperspectral Images Using the PARAFAC Model and Statistical Performance Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Naoto Yokoya,et al.  Coupled Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Unmixing for Hyperspectral and Multispectral Data Fusion , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Alfonso Fernández-Manso,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2012 .

[18]  Yasuyuki Matsushita,et al.  High-resolution hyperspectral imaging via matrix factorization , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[19]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Endmember variability in Spectral Mixture Analysis: A review , 2011 .

[20]  Jean-Yves Tourneret,et al.  Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion Based on a Sparse Representation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Wing-Kin Ma,et al.  Hyperspectral Super-Resolution: A Coupled Tensor Factorization Approach , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[22]  Shutao Li,et al.  Fusing Hyperspectral and Multispectral Images via Coupled Sparse Tensor Factorization , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  David Brie,et al.  Coupled Tensor Low-rank Multilinear Approximation for Hyperspectral Super-resolution , 2019, ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[24]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[25]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Hyperspectral Super-Resolution: Combining Low Rank Tensor and Matrix Structure , 2018, 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[26]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[27]  Russell C. Hardie,et al.  MAP estimation for hyperspectral image resolution enhancement using an auxiliary sensor , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  Joos Vandewalle,et al.  A Multilinear Singular Value Decomposition , 2000, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[29]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Nonlocal Coupled Tensor CP Decomposition for Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[30]  Yanjun Li,et al.  Identifiability in Bilinear Inverse Problems With Applications to Subspace or Sparsity-Constrained Blind Gain and Phase Calibration , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[31]  John F. Arnold,et al.  Reliably estimating the noise in AVIRIS hyperspectral images , 1996 .

[32]  Ricardo Augusto Borsoi,et al.  Super-Resolution for Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion Accounting for Seasonal Spectral Variability , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[33]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Spectral Variability in Hyperspectral Data Unmixing: A Comprehensive Review , 2020 .

[34]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  MTF-tailored Multiscale Fusion of High-resolution MS and Pan Imagery , 2006 .

[35]  David Krutz,et al.  DESIS (DLR Earth Sensing Imaging Spectrometer for the ISS-MUSES platform) , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[36]  Lieven De Lathauwer,et al.  Decompositions of a Higher-Order Tensor in Block Terms - Part III: Alternating Least Squares Algorithms , 2008, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[37]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Hyperspectral Super-Resolution With Coupled Tucker Approximation: Recoverability and SVD-Based Algorithms , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[38]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Spectral Imaging for Remote Sensing , 2003 .

[39]  Timo Stuffler,et al.  EnMAP A Hyperspectral Sensor for Environmental Mapping and Analysis , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[40]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Tensor Decompositions for Signal Processing Applications: From two-way to multiway component analysis , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[41]  Cédric Richard,et al.  A Fast Multiscale Spatial Regularization for Sparse Hyperspectral Unmixing , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[42]  Lieven De Lathauwer,et al.  Decompositions of a Higher-Order Tensor in Block Terms - Part II: Definitions and Uniqueness , 2008, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[43]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  A Convex Formulation for Hyperspectral Image Superresolution via Subspace-Based Regularization , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.