PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF REAR IMPACT DUMMIES: HYBRID III (TRID), BIORID AND RID2

The objective of this study is to compare the performance of different seats using the named three dummies in low speed rear-end impact sled tests.

[1]  Harald Zellmer,et al.  ENHANCEMENT OF SEAT PERFORMANCE IN LOW-SPEED REAR IMPACT , 2001 .

[2]  J Berliner,et al.  A Comparison of the Hybrid III and BioRID II Dummies in Low-Severity, Rear-Impact Sled Tests. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[3]  Harald Zellmer,et al.  Evolution of a dynamic seat test standard proposal for a better protection after rear-end impact , 2000 .

[4]  G. Siegmund,et al.  Kinetic and Kinematic Responses of the RID2a, Hybrid III and Human Volunteers in Low-Speed Rear-End Collisions. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[5]  Peter Niederer,et al.  A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION CANDIDATE FOR REAR-END COLLISIONS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SHEAR FORCES AND BENDING MOMENTS , 2001 .

[6]  Naoki Okano,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF PROTOTYPE SEATS USING BIORID-P3 AND HYBRID III WITH TRID NECK , 2000 .

[7]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  Prediction of neck injuries in rear impacts based on accident data and simulations , 1997 .

[8]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  BIORID I: A NEW BIOFIDELIC REAR IMPACT DUMMY , 1998 .

[9]  David C. Viano,et al.  Neck Biomechanical Responses with Active Head Restraints: Rear Barrier Tests with BioRID and Sled Tests with Hybrid III , 2002 .

[10]  Harald Zellmer,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE REBOUND PHASE IN LOW SPEED REAR END IMPACTS , 2000 .

[11]  Felix H. Walz,et al.  Injury Criteria Applied to Seat Comparison Tests , 2002 .

[12]  Jac Wismans,et al.  Development and evaluation of a new rear-impact crash dummy: the RID2 , 2001 .