Attentional Fluctuations Influence the Neural Fidelity and Connectivity of Stimulus Representations

Attention is thought to facilitate both the representation of task-relevant features and the communication of these representations across large-scale brain networks. However, attention is not “all or none,” but rather it fluctuates between stable/accurate (in-the-zone) and variable/error-prone (out-of-the-zone) states. Here we ask how different attentional states relate to the neural processing and transmission of task-relevant information. Specifically, during in-the-zone periods: (1) Do neural representations of task stimuli have greater fidelity? (2) Is there increased communication of this stimulus information across large-scale brain networks? Finally, (3) can the influence of performance-contingent reward be differentiated from zone-based fluctuations? To address these questions, we used fMRI and representational similarity analysis during a visual sustained attention task (the gradCPT). Participants (n = 16) viewed a series of city or mountain scenes, responding to cities (90% of trials) and withholding to mountains (10%). Representational similarity matrices, reflecting the similarity structure of the city exemplars (n = 10), were computed from visual, attentional, and default mode networks. Representational fidelity (RF) and representational connectivity (RC) were quantified as the interparticipant reliability of representational similarity matrices within (RF) and across (RC) brain networks. We found that being in the zone was characterized by increased RF in visual networks and increasing RC between visual and attentional networks. Conversely, reward only increased the RC between the attentional and default mode networks. These results diverge with analogous analyses using functional connectivity, suggesting that RC and functional connectivity in tandem better characterize how different mental states modulate the flow of information throughout the brain.

[1]  David J. Madden,et al.  Brain Connectivity and Visual Attention , 2013, Brain Connect..

[2]  E. Maguire,et al.  What does the retrosplenial cortex do? , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Representational geometry : integrating cognition , computation , and the brain , 2013 .

[4]  D. Besner,et al.  A Resource-Control Account of Sustained Attention , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[5]  R. Shepard,et al.  Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of states ☆ , 1970 .

[6]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  Feature-selective Attention in Frontoparietal Cortex: Multivoxel Codes Adjust to Prioritize Task-relevant Information , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Joy J Geng,et al.  Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Confounds in multivariate pattern analysis: Theory and rule representation case study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[9]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Informational connectivity: identifying synchronized discriminability of multi-voxel patterns across the brain , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  Jonathan W. Pillow,et al.  A Bayesian method for reducing bias in neural representational similarity analysis , 2016, bioRxiv.

[11]  Janice Chen,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension , 2016, Nature Communications.

[12]  D Wager Tor,et al.  NeuroSynth: a new platform for large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011 .

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  High-Frequency, Long-Range Coupling Between Prefrontal and Visual Cortex During Attention , 2009, Science.

[14]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[15]  Joy J Geng,et al.  Distractor Probability Changes the Shape of the Attentional Template , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  I. Momennejad,et al.  The Role of the Parietal Cortex in the Representation of Task–Reward Associations , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Pollmann,et al.  Retinotopic Activation in Response to Subjective Contours in Primary Visual Cortex , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[18]  M. Eimer The neural basis of attentional control in visual search , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  L. Yao,et al.  Causal Interactions in Attention Networks Predict Behavioral Performance , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Guanyu Liu,et al.  Reward reveals dissociable aspects of sustained attention. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  M. Chun,et al.  A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[24]  Francesca C. Fortenbaugh,et al.  Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Reward Motivation Enhances Task Coding in Frontoparietal Cortex. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[27]  Michael Cole,et al.  Cognitive task information is transferred between brain regions via resting-state network topology , 2017 .

[28]  S. Kastner,et al.  A neural basis for real-world visual search in human occipitotemporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[30]  Yaoda Xu Reevaluating the Sensory Account of Visual Working Memory Storage , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Sensitivity to stimulus similarity is associated with greater sustained attention ability , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[32]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[35]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Connectome-based Models Predict Separable Components of Attention in Novel Individuals , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Marius V. Peelen,et al.  Preparatory Activity in Posterior Temporal Cortex Causally Contributes to Object Detection in Scenes , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Task context impacts visual object processing differentially across the cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[40]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Decoding Task-based Attentional Modulation during Face Categorization , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  H. P. Op de Beeck,et al.  Task Context Overrules Object- and Category-Related Representational Content in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Samuel A. Nastase,et al.  Attention Selectively Reshapes the Geometry of Distributed Semantic Representation , 2016, bioRxiv.

[43]  R. T. Constable,et al.  Characterizing Attention with Predictive Network Models , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  J. Duncan The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[45]  Soojin Park,et al.  Disentangling Scene Content from Spatial Boundary: Complementary Roles for the Parahippocampal Place Area and Lateral Occipital Complex in Representing Real-World Scenes , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[47]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Anchoring the neural compass: Coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  A. Ishai,et al.  Recollection- and Familiarity-Based Decisions Reflect Memory Strength , 2008, Frontiers in systems neuroscience.

[49]  F. Tong,et al.  Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  S. Kastner,et al.  Attention in the real world: toward understanding its neural basis , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Chris I. Baker,et al.  Deconstructing multivariate decoding for the study of brain function , 2017, NeuroImage.

[52]  G. Zelinsky,et al.  Short article: Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  M. Raichle The brain's default mode network. , 2015, Annual review of neuroscience.

[54]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Visual representations are dominated by intrinsic fluctuations correlated between areas , 2015, NeuroImage.

[55]  S. Kastner,et al.  From Behavior to Neural Dynamics: An Integrated Theory of Attention , 2015, Neuron.

[56]  J. Duncan,et al.  Adaptive Coding of Task-Relevant Information in Human Frontoparietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Ferdinand Binkofski,et al.  The role of the parietal cortex in sensorimotor transformations and action coding. , 2018, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[58]  David Badre,et al.  Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro–caudal organization of the frontal lobes , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  Jason M. Scimeca,et al.  Reaffirming the Sensory Recruitment Account of Working Memory , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Multivariate pattern connectivity , 2016, bioRxiv.

[61]  E. Miller,et al.  Response to Comment on "Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices" , 2007, Science.

[62]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  Dirk Bernhardt-Walther,et al.  Using Confusion Matrices to Estimate Mutual Information between Two Categorical Measurements , 2013, PRNI.

[64]  J. Changeux,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing , 2011, Neuron.

[65]  Manfred G Kitzbichler,et al.  Cognitive Effort Drives Workspace Configuration of Human Brain Functional Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[67]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Sustaining visual attention in the face of distraction: a novel gradual-onset continuous performance task , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[68]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Unique semantic space in the brain of each beholder predicts perceived similarity , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  Exploring Functional Connectivities of the Human Brain using Multivariate Information Analysis , 2009, NIPS.

[70]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort. , 2017, Annual review of neuroscience.

[71]  R. Mark Richardson,et al.  Title : Multi-Connection Pattern Analysis : Decoding the Representational 1 Content of Neural Communication 2 3 4 5 6 7 , 2017 .

[72]  L. McIntire,et al.  Detection of vigilance performance using eye blinks. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[73]  M. Esterman,et al.  Spontaneous default network activity reflects behavioral variability independent of mind-wandering , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  Marc N. Coutanche,et al.  Beyond Functional Connectivity: Investigating Networks of Multivariate Representations , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations in Sustained Attention and Distractor Processing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[76]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Perceptual expectation evokes category-selective cortical activity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[77]  Geoffrey Karl Aguirre,et al.  Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[78]  Li Su,et al.  A Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[79]  Michael J. Hove,et al.  Dynamic Brain Network Correlates of Spontaneous Fluctuations in Attention , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[80]  C. Paffen,et al.  Visual Working Memory Storage Recruits Sensory Processing Areas , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[81]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[82]  David Rothlein,et al.  Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention: A robust replication and extension , 2018, NeuroImage.

[83]  Michael C Hout,et al.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[84]  Guanyu Liu,et al.  Modulating Reward Induces Differential Neurocognitive Approaches to Sustained Attention , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[85]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.