Metabolites in safety testing.

Traditionally, only circulating concentrations of parent drug have been measured in the rodent and nonrodent test species used for drug safety assessments and served as an index of systemic exposure for comparisons to human exposures. Circulating concentrations of metabolites have generally only been measured in specialized circumstances (e.g., parent compound was extensively metabolized). Measurement of only the parent compound is usually sufficient when the metabolite profile in humans is similar to that in at least one of the animal species used in the nonclinical safety assessment. However, it is possible that metabolites formed in humans might not be present in the rodent and nonrodent test species used for drug safety assessments or the metabolites are formed at disproportionately higher concentrations in humans than in the animal test species. Generally, metabolites identified only in human plasma or metabolites present at disproportionately higher concentrations in humans than in any of the animal test species should be considered for safety assessment. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) published a Guidance for Industry on Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites that provides current thinking within CDER on the nonclinical safety assessment of human drug metabolites derived from drug products. The CDER guidance defines human metabolites that can raise a safety concern as those formed at greater than 10% of parent drug systemic exposure at a steady state. By contrast, the more recent International Conference on Harmonization: Guideline on Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals (ICH M3[R2]) describes the threshold as 10% of total drug-related exposure. Where they differ, the ICH guidance supersedes the CDER Guidance. The purpose of this article is to provide a perspective on the important details of these guidances from a regulatory review standpoint, as well as discuss some concerns that have arisen from the regulated industry regarding the CDER guidance. Such issues include parent drug that is extensively metabolized, metabolism by intestinal bacteria and metabolites formed by nonclinical test species but not humans.

[1]  Thomayant Prueksaritanont,et al.  Complicating factors in safety testing of drug metabolites: kinetic differences between generated and preformed metabolites. , 2006, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[2]  J. Horn,et al.  Review article: similarities and differences among delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitor formulations , 2005, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[3]  M. Grillo,et al.  Covalent Binding of Phenylacetic Acid to Protein in Incubations with Freshly Isolated Rat Hepatocytes , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[4]  R Scott Obach,et al.  SEEING THROUGH THE MIST: ABUNDANCE VERSUS PERCENTAGE. COMMENTARY ON METABOLITES IN SAFETY TESTING , 2005, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[5]  A. Mutlib,et al.  Identification and characterization of efavirenz metabolites by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and high field NMR: species differences in the metabolism of efavirenz. , 1999, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[6]  Esther F. Schmid,et al.  Drug withdrawals and the lessons within. , 2006, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[7]  Roger O McClellan,et al.  Development of safety qualification thresholds and their use in orally inhaled and nasal drug product evaluation. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  C. D. Thompson,et al.  Quantification in Patient Urine Samples of Felbamate and Three Metabolites: Acid Carbamate and Two Mercapturic Acids , 1999, Epilepsia.

[9]  H. Heck,et al.  Determination of formaldehyde in biological tissues by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 1982, Biomedical mass spectrometry.

[10]  Abigail Jacobs,et al.  Drug metabolites in safety testing. , 2003, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[11]  R. Rothman,et al.  Serotonergic drugs and valvular heart disease , 2009, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[12]  J. Ware,et al.  Studies on the chemical reactivity of diclofenac acyl glucuronide with glutathione: identification of diclofenac-S-acyl-glutathione in rat bile. , 2003, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[13]  Donald G Robertson,et al.  Metabonomic identification of two distinct phenotypes in Sprague-Dawley (Crl:CD(SD)) rats. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[14]  L. Sasongko,et al.  Simultaneous quantification of losartan and active metabolite in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using irbesartan as internal standard. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[15]  R Scott Obach,et al.  Metabolites and safety: What are the concerns, and how should we address them? , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[16]  Karen L Davis-Bruno,et al.  A regulatory perspective on issues and approaches in characterizing human metabolites. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[17]  K. Pang,et al.  Safety testing of metabolites: Expectations and outcomes. , 2009, Chemico-biological interactions.

[18]  Y. Masubuchi Metabolic and non-metabolic factors determining troglitazone hepatotoxicity: a review. , 2006, Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

[19]  J. Mason,et al.  Review article: gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease – the health economic implications , 2005, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[20]  F. Sistare,et al.  Safety assessment of drug metabolites: implications of regulatory guidance and potential application of genetically engineered mouse models that express human P450s. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.

[21]  T. Baillie,et al.  Drug metabolites in safety testing. , 2002, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[22]  I. Wilson,et al.  The role of gut microbiota in drug response. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical design.

[23]  Donald G Robertson,et al.  Communication regarding metabonomic identification of two distinct phenotypes in Sprague-Dawley (Crl:CD(SD)) rats. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[24]  E. Kharasch,et al.  Contribution of CYP2E1 and CYP3A to acetaminophen reactive metabolite formation , 2000, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[25]  K. Pang,et al.  Kinetics of metabolite formation and elimination in the perfused rat liver preparation: differences between the elimination of preformed acetaminophen and acetaminophen formed from phenacetin. , 1978, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.