High-n immersion lithography

A two-year study on the feasibility of High-n Immersion Lithography shows very promising results. This paper reports the findings of the study. The evaluation shows the tremendous progress made in the development of second-generation immersion fluid technology. Candidate fluids from several suppliers have been evaluated. All the commercial fluids evaluated are viable, so there are a number of options. Life tests have been conducted on bench top fluid-handling systems and the results referenced to full-scale systems. Parameters such as Dose per Laser Pulse, Pulse Rate, Fluid Flow Rate, and Fluid Absorbency at 193nm, and Oxygen/Air Contamination Levels were explored. A detailed evaluation of phenomena such as Last Lens Element (LLE) contamination has been conducted. Lens cleaning has been evaluated. A comparison of High-n fluid-based technology and water-based immersion technology shows interesting advantages of High-n fluid in the areas of Defect and Resist Interaction. Droplet Drying tests, Resist Staining evaluations, and Resist Contrast impact studies have all been run. Defect-generating mechanisms have been identified and are being eliminated. The lower evaporation rate of the High-n fluids compared with water shows the advantages of High-n Immersion. The core issue for the technology, the availability of High-n optical material for use as the final lens element, is updated. Samples of LuAG material have been received from development partners and have been evaluated. The latest status of optical materials and the technology timelines are reported. The potential impact of the availability of the technology is discussed. Synergy with technologies such as Double Patterning is discussed. The prospects for <22nm (hp) are evaluated.

[1]  Atsushi Nakamura,et al.  Improvement of watermark defect in immersion lithography: mechanism of watermark defect formation and its reduction by using alkaline-soluble immersion topcoat , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Roger H. French,et al.  Second generation fluids for 193 nm immersion lithography , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Simon G. Kaplan,et al.  Immersion fluid refractive indices using prism minimum deviation techniques , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Vladimir Liberman,et al.  Laser durability studies of high index immersion fluids: fluid degradation and optics contamination effects , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  M. F. Lemon,et al.  High-index immersion lithography with second-generation immersion fluids to enable numerical aperatures of 1.55 for cost effective 32-nm half pitches , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Vladimir Liberman,et al.  Impact of photoacid generator leaching on optics photocontamination in 193-nm immersion lithography , 2007 .

[7]  Mark Slezak,et al.  High-refractive index material design for ArF immersion lithography , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Yong Wang,et al.  High-refractive-index fluids for the next-generation ArF immersion lithography , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Sheng Peng,et al.  Second generation fluids for 193nm immersion lithography , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Hideharu Kyoda,et al.  An investigation on defect-generation conditions in immersion lithography , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  R. G. Cox.  The dynamics of the spreading of liquids on a solid surface. Part 1. Viscous flow , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Steven R. J. Brueck,et al.  Extension of 193-nm immersion optical lithography to the 22-nm half-pitch node , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Yasuhiro Iriuchijima,et al.  Immersion defectivity study with volume production immersion lithography tool , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.