A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension

We used the visual world eye-tracking paradigm to investigate the effects of cognitive load on predictive eye movements in L1 (Experiment 1) and L2 (Experiment 2) speakers. Participants listened to sentences whose verb was predictive or non-predictive towards one of four objects they were viewing. They then clicked on a mentioned object. Half the participants additionally performed a working memory task of remembering words. Both L1 and L2 speakers looked more at the target object predictively in predictable- than in non-predictable sentences when they performed the listen-and-click task only. However, this predictability effect was delayed in those who performed the concurrent memory task. This pattern of results was similar in L1 and L2 speakers. L1 and L2 speakers make predictions, but cognitive resources are required for making predictive eye movements. The findings are compatible with the claim that L2 speakers use the same mechanisms as L1 speakers to make predictions.

[1]  Marte Otten,et al.  Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming? , 2008 .

[2]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  A. Baddeley Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  Falk Huettig,et al.  Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake--but only for skilled producers. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Edith Kaan,et al.  Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? , 2014 .

[6]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Aine Ito,et al.  On Predicting Form and Meaning in a Second Language , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese* , 2015, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[9]  Kate Nation,et al.  Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  Falk Huettig,et al.  Four central questions about prediction in language processing , 2015, Brain Research.

[11]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[12]  D. Barr Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[13]  J. Elman,et al.  Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  Arielle Borovsky,et al.  Novel word learning: An eye-tracking study. Are 18-month-old late talkers really different from their typical peers? , 2015, Journal of communication disorders.

[15]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Integration of Syntactic and Semantic Information in Predictive Processing: Cross-Linguistic Evidence from German and English , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[17]  Gina R Kuperberg,et al.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[18]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition* , 2016, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[19]  K. McRae,et al.  Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts , 2001 .

[20]  G. Altmann,et al.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm , 2005, Cognition.

[21]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events , 2005, Cognition.

[22]  M G Saslow,et al.  Latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[23]  E. Struyf,et al.  Impact of stuttering severity on adolescents' domain-specific and general self-esteem through cognitive and emotional mediating processes. , 2015, Journal of communication disorders.

[24]  J. Magnuson,et al.  The time course of anticipatory constraint integration , 2011, Cognition.

[25]  Craig G. Chambers,et al.  Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[27]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[28]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[29]  M K Tanenhaus,et al.  Eye Movements and Lexical Access in Spoken-Language Comprehension: Evaluating a Linking Hypothesis between Fixations and Linguistic Processing , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[30]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[31]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[32]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials , 2016 .

[33]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do , 2013 .

[35]  A. Meyer,et al.  Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[36]  L Robert Slevc,et al.  Memory and cognitive control in an integrated theory of language processing , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Looking, language, and memory: bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[39]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms. , 2004 .

[40]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  Memory-Load Interference in Syntactic Processing , 2002, Psychological science.

[41]  Gary S Dell,et al.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Falk Huettig,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world , 2016 .

[43]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words , 2012 .

[44]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[45]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[46]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.