Refined analytical models for pipe-lay on elasto-plastic seabed

Abstract This paper presents a refined analytical solution for pipe-laying on an elasto-plastic seabed. The solution builds on previous work, extending it to include elastic rebound of the pipe. The approach simplifies the pipeline as the combination of four segments: a natural catenary through most of the water column; a boundary-layer segment in the water close to the seabed where the bending stiffness of the pipe modifies the shape of the catenary; a beam under uniform tension through the touch down zone up to the point where maximum pipe–soil load concentration occurs, within which the soil responds plastically; and finally a rebound segment, also modelled as a beam under uniform tension, where the soil rebounds elastically as the pipe–soil contact force reduces back to the submerged pipe weight. Continuity of displacement, gradient, bending moment, shear and deduced tension along the pipeline are preserved. In comparison with previous models, such as a rigid-plastic seabed model, the distribution of seabed resistance is continuous. Results from the solution are presented for the case of seabed resistance to pipe penetration increasingly proportionally with depth, as is approximately the case at very shallow depths within the seabed. The lower the gradient of seabed resistance, the greater is the pipe embedment, but the maximum contact force and curvature of the pipe both reduce. Analyses also show that the rebound stiffness can have a marked effect on pipeline embedment, which increases with increasing rebound stiffness. However, the effect on pipe embedment becomes small beyond a certain ratio of rebound stiffness to shear strength.

[1]  Vincenzo Mallardo,et al.  A refined analytical analysis of submerged pipelines in seabed laying , 1999 .

[2]  Massimo Callegari,et al.  Simple analytical models for the J-lay problem , 2005 .

[3]  D. R. Rutledge,et al.  Stiffened Catenary Calculations in Pipeline Laying Problem , 1968 .

[4]  K. S. Varyani,et al.  An absolute coordinate formulation for three-dimensional flexible pipe analysis , 2006 .

[5]  Charles Aubeny,et al.  Collapse Loads for a Cylinder Embedded in Trench in Cohesive Soil , 2005 .

[6]  M. Randolph,et al.  Estimation of intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from penetration tests in soft clays , 2010 .

[7]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Non-Linear Hysteretic Seabed Model for Catenary Pipeline Contact , 2009 .

[8]  Andrew Palmer,et al.  Configuration of Submarine Pipelines During Laying Operations , 1974 .

[9]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Pipeline Embedment in deep water: processes and quantitative assessment , 2008 .

[10]  H. Dendani,et al.  Gulf of Guinea deepwater sediments: Geotechnical properties, design issues and installation experiences , 2010 .

[11]  Andrew Palmer,et al.  Touchdown indentation of the seabed , 2008 .

[12]  Feng Yuan,et al.  Analytical analysis of pipeline–soil interaction during J-lay on a plastic seabed with bearing resistance proportional to depth , 2012 .

[13]  Minoo H. Patel,et al.  Mathematics of flexible risers including pressure and internal flow effects , 1992 .

[14]  Charles Aubeny,et al.  Seafloor Interaction With Steel Catenary Risers , 2008 .

[15]  Y. Lee,et al.  The origin of near-seafloor “crust zones” in deepwater , 2005 .

[16]  Feng Yuan,et al.  Analytical Prediction of Pipeline Behaviors in J-Lay on Plastic Seabed , 2012 .

[17]  Feng Yuan,et al.  Numerical analysis of pipeline in J-lay problem , 2010 .

[18]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Modelling the embedment process during offshore pipe-laying on fine-grained soils , 2013 .