Spotting, collecting and documenting negative polarity items

As the nature of negative polarity items (NPIs) and their licensing contexts is still under much debate, a broad empirical basis is an important cornerstone to support further insights in this area of research. The work discussed in this paper is intended as a contribution to realizing this objective. We briefly introduce the phenomenon of NPIs and outline major theories about their licensing and also various licensing contexts before discussing our major topics: Firstly, a corpus-based retrieval method for NPI candidates is described that ranks the candidates according to their distributional dependence on the licensing contexts. Our method extracts single-word candidates and is extended to also capture multi-word candidates. The basic idea for automatically collecting NPI candidates from a large corpus is that an NPI behaves like a kind of collocate to its licensing contexts. Manual inspection and interpretation of the candidate lists identify the actual NPIs. Secondly, an online repository for NPIs and other items that show distributional idiosyncrasies is presented, which offers an empirical database for further (theoretical) research on these items in a sustainable way.

[1]  F. Zwarts.  A Hierarchy of Negative Expressions , 1996 .

[2]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  The Semantics and Pragmatics of Weak and Strong Polarity Items in Assertions , 1994 .

[3]  H. J. Arnold.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[4]  Paul Rayson,et al.  Comparing Corpora using Frequency Profiling , 2000, Proceedings of the workshop on Comparing corpora -.

[5]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  NPI Licensing, Strawson Entailment, and Context Dependency , 1999, J. Semant..

[6]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Licensing of negative polarity items under inverse scope , 1998 .

[7]  H. Wansing,et al.  Negation : a notion in focus , 1996 .

[8]  E. Hinrichs,et al.  Plurality and quantification , 1998 .

[9]  Albert Borgmann,et al.  The Structure of Language , 1954, The Classical Review.

[10]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  J. Hoeksema.  Dutch ENIG: from nonveridicality to downward entailment , 2010 .

[12]  A. Giannakidou.  The Landscape of Polarity Items , 1997 .

[13]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base , 2007 .

[14]  Stefan Evert,et al.  The Statistics of Word Cooccur-rences: Word Pairs and Collocations , 2004 .

[15]  F. Zwarts.  Three Types of Polarity , 1997 .

[16]  Eneko Agirre,et al.  Word Sense Disambiguation: Algorithms and Applications , 2007 .

[17]  T. V. Wouden.  Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation , 1997 .

[18]  J. Hoeksema.  Scalarity and polarity: a study of scalar adverbs as polarity items , 2001 .

[19]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography , 1989, ACL.

[20]  Cleo Condoravdi,et al.  NPI licensing in temporal clauses , 2010 .

[21]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Processing polarity items: Contrastive licensing costs , 2004, Brain and Language.

[22]  J. Skilling,et al.  Algorithms and Applications , 1985 .

[23]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency , 2000 .

[24]  William A. Ladusaw.  Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations , 1980 .

[25]  Marcia C. Linebarger,et al.  Negative polarity and grammatical representation , 1987 .

[26]  Eric Vallduví,et al.  Polarity items, n-words and minimizers in Catalan and Spanish , 1994 .

[27]  Jacob Hoeksema.  Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items , 2001 .

[28]  Wilfried Kürschner,et al.  Studien zur Negation im Deutschen , 1983 .

[29]  Jacob Hoeksema,et al.  Negative polarity and the comparative , 1983 .

[30]  Svatava Spurná,et al.  Negation in English , 2008 .

[31]  Werner Welte.  Negationslinguistik : Ansätze zur Beschreibung und Erklärung von Aspekten der Negation im Englischen , 1978 .

[32]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[33]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.