Connectivity Analysis of Millimeter-Wave Device-to-Device Networks with Blockage

We consider device-to-device (D2D) communications in millimeter-wave (mm Wave) for the future fifth generation (5G) cellular networks. While the mm Wave systems can support multiple D2D pairs simultaneously through beamforming with highly directional antenna arrays, the mm Wave channel is significantly more susceptible to blockage compared to microwave; mm Wave channel studies indicate that if line-of-sight (LoS) paths are blocked, reliable mm Wave communications may not be achieved for high data-rate applications. Therefore, assuming that an outage occurs in the absence of the LoS path between two wireless devices by obstructions, we focus on connectivity of the mm Wave D2D networks. We consider two types of D2D communications: direct and indirect schemes. The connectivity performances of the two schemes are investigated in terms of (i) the probability to achieve a fully connected network and (ii) the average number of reliably connected devices . Through analysis and simulation, we show that, as the network size increases, and decrease. Also, and decrease, when the blockage parameter increases. Moreover, simulation results indicate that the hybrid direct and indirect scheme can improve both and up to about 35% compared to the nonhybrid scheme.

[1]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Five disruptive technology directions for 5G , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Olga Galinina,et al.  Analyzing Assisted Offloading of Cellular User Sessions onto D2D Links in Unlicensed Bands , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Anthony Ephremides,et al.  Energy-Efficient Broadcast and Multicast Trees in Wireless Networks , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[4]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Enabling device-to-device communications in millimeter-wave 5G cellular networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Haejoon Jung,et al.  Outage Analysis of Millimeter-Wave Wireless Backhaul in the Presence of Blockage , 2016, IEEE Communications Letters.

[6]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Coverage and Rate Analysis for Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work! , 2013, IEEE Access.

[8]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Broadband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Models Using Adaptive-Beam Antennas for Outdoor Urban Cellular Communications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  An Overview on 3GPP Device-to-Device Proximity Services , 2013, 1310.0116.

[11]  Jinho Choi,et al.  On the Macro Diversity With Multiple BSs to Mitigate Blockage in Millimeter-Wave Communications , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[12]  Xiqi Gao,et al.  Cellular architecture and key technologies for 5G wireless communication networks , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Evelyn Fix,et al.  Random points in a circle and the analysis of chromosome patterns , 1963 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  What Will 5G Be? , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Analysis of Blockage Effects on Urban Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[16]  Carl Wijting,et al.  Device-to-device communication as an underlay to LTE-advanced networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Aarnout Brombacher,et al.  Probability... , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  Sridhar Rajagopal,et al.  Channel Feasibility for Outdoor Non-Line-of-Sight mmWave Mobile Communication , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[19]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .