Optimal Response to Cardiac Arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects.

INTRODUCTION Advances in early defibrillation access, key to the "Chain of Survival", will depend on innovations in defibrillation waveforms, because of their impact on device size and weight. This study compared standard monophasic waveform automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) to an innovative biphasic waveform AED. MATERIAL AND METHODS Impedance-compensated biphasic truncated exponential (ICBTE) and either monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) or monophasic damped sine (MDS) AEDs were prospectively, randomly assigned by date in four emergency medical services. The study design compared ICBTE with MTE and MDS combined. This subset analysis distinguishes between the two classes of monophasic waveform, MTE and MDS, and compares their performance to each other and to the biphasic waveform, contingent on significant overall effects (ICBTE vs. MTE vs. MDS). Primary endpoint: Defibrillation efficacy with < or =3 shocks. Secondary endpoints: shock efficacy with < or =1 shock, < or =2 shocks, and survival to hospital admission and discharge. Observations included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), refibrillation, and time to first shock and to first successful shock. RESULTS Of 338 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 115 had a cardiac aetiology, presented with ventricular fibrillation, and were shocked by an AED. Defibrillation efficacy for the first "stack" of up to 3 shocks, for up to 2 shocks and for the first shock alone was superior for the ICBTE waveform than for either the MTE or the MDS waveform, while there was no difference between the efficacy of MTE and MDS. Time from the beginning of analysis by the AED to the first shock and to the first successful shock was also superior for the ICBTE devices compared to either the MTE or the MDS devices, while again there was no difference between the MTE and MDS devices. More ICBTE patients achieved ROSC pre-hospital than did MTE patients. While the rates of ROSC were identical for MTE and MDS patients, the difference between ICBTE and MDS was not significant. Rates of refibrillation and survival to hospital admission and discharge did not differ among the three populations. CONCLUSIONS ICBTE was superior to MTE and MDS in defibrillation efficacy and speed and to MTE in ROSC. MTE and MDS did not differ in efficacy. There were no differences among the waveforms in refibrillation or survival.

[1]  L. Geddes,et al.  Comparative efficacy of damped sine wave and square wave current for transchest ventricular defibrillation in animals. , 1978, Medical instrumentation.

[2]  R. Kerber,et al.  Truncated exponential versus damped sinusoidal waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  R. White,et al.  Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients. , 1999, Resuscitation.

[4]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  Low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation: evidence-based review applied to emergency cardiovascular care guidelines: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Committee on Emergency Cardiovascular Care and the Subcommittees on Basic Life Support, Advanced Cardia , 1998, Circulation.

[5]  A. M. Dolan,et al.  Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation with Square‐wave Stimuli: One‐Half Cycle, One Cycle, and Multicycle Waveforms , 1964, Circulation research.

[6]  L. Geddes,et al.  Comparison of the efficacy of defibrillation with the damped sine and constant-tilt current waveforms in the intact animal. , 1987, Medical instrumentation.

[7]  D J Roe,et al.  Estimating effectiveness of cardiac arrest interventions: a logistic regression survival model. , 1997, Circulation.

[8]  J. Ornato,et al.  Early defibrillation: an advisory statement from the Advanced Life Support Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. , 1997, Circulation.

[9]  A. Handley,et al.  The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult single rescuer basic life support , 1998, BMJ.

[10]  H. Halperin,et al.  Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation. , 2000, Circulation.

[11]  J. Ornato,et al.  Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care, V: Pediatric basic life support , 1992 .

[12]  G. Bardy,et al.  Comparison of naive sixth-grade children with trained professionals in the use of an automated external defibrillator. , 1999, Circulation.

[13]  Jerry H. Gold,et al.  Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation in the 100 kg Calf with Symmetrical One-Cycle Bidirectional Rectangular Wave Stimuli , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  J. Jones,et al.  Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  M. Weil,et al.  The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  R E Jones,et al.  Improved defibrillator waveform safety factor with biphasic waveforms. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  M. Copass,et al.  Use of the automatic external defibrillator in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  D. Chamberlain,et al.  USE OF AN AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR-PACEMAKER BY AMBULANCE STAFF , 1982, The Lancet.

[19]  I. Stiell,et al.  Improved Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Through the Inexpensive Optimization of an Existing Defibrillation Program: OPALS Study Phase II , 1999 .

[20]  C Robertson,et al.  The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support: A statement from the Working Group on Advanced Life Support, and approved by the executive committee. , 1998, Resuscitation.

[21]  James K. Russell,et al.  Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial of 150-J Biphasic Shocks Compared With 200- to 360-J Monophasic Shocks in the Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Victims , 2000, Circulation.

[22]  Norman A. Paradis,et al.  [Cardiac arrest]. , 1981, Xianggang hu li za zhi. The Hong Kong nursing journal.

[23]  R. Myerburg,et al.  Sudden Cardiac Death: Epidemiology, Transient Risk, and Intervention Assessment , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Thomas D. Lyster,et al.  Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator. The LIFE Investigators. , 1998, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[25]  S. Hohnloser.  Implantable devices versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in recurrent ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  Roger D. White,et al.  Seven years' experience with early defibrillation by police and paramedics in an emergency medical services system. , 1998, Resuscitation.

[27]  M. Copass,et al.  Cardiac arrest treated with a new automatic external defibrillator by out-of-hospital first responders. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[28]  Kenneth A. Ellenbogen,et al.  Sudden cardiac death : past, present, and future , 1997 .