A Densified Liquid Methane Delivery System for the Altair Ascent Stage

¶The Altair Lunar Lander is currently carrying options for both cryogenic and hypergolic ascent stage propulsion modules. The cryogenic option uses liquid methane and liquid oxygen to propel Altair from the lunar surface back to rendezvous with the Orion command module. Recent studies have determined that the liquid methane should be densified by subcooling it to 93 K in order to prevent over-pressurization of the propellant tanks during the 210 day stay on the lunar surface. A trade study has been conducted to determine the preferred method of producing, loading, and maintaining the subcooled, densified liquid methane onboard Altair from a ground operations perspective. The trade study took into account the limitations in mass for the launch vehicle and the mobile launch platform as well as the historical reliability of various components and their thermal efficiencies. Several unique problems were encountered, namely delivering a small amount of a cryogenic propellant to a flight tank that’s positioned over 350 feet above the launch pad as well as generating the desired delivery temperature of the methane at 93 K which is only 2.3 K above the methane triple point of 90.7 K. Over twenty methods of subcooled liquid methane production and delivery along with the associated system architectures were investigated to determine the best solutions to the problem. The top four cryogenic processing solutions were selected for further evaluation and detailed thermal modeling. This paper describes the results of the preliminary trade analysis of the twenty plus methane densification methods considered. The results of the detailed analysis will be briefed to the Altair Project Office and their propulsion team as well as the Ground Operations Project Office before the down-select is made between cryogenic and hypergolic ascent stages in August, 2010.

[1]  Thomas M. Tomsik.  Performance Tests of a Liquid Hydrogen Propellant Densification Ground System for the X33/RLV , 1997 .

[2]  L. Chow,et al.  Design and Experiment of Compact and Effective Carbon Foam Recuperative Heat Exchangers , 2009 .

[3]  Michael P. Doherty,et al.  Cryogenic Fluid Management Technology For Moon and Mars Missions , 2009 .

[4]  M. M. Fazah.  STS propellant densification feasibility study data book , 1994 .

[5]  Ke Nguyen,et al.  Propellant Densification for Launch Vehicles: Simulation and Testing , 2002 .

[6]  James E. Fesmire,et al.  Cryogenic Insulation System for Soft Vacuum , 2000 .

[7]  Thomas M. Tomsik,et al.  Recent Advances and Applications in Cryogenic Propellant Densification Technology , 2000 .

[8]  John C. Mankins,et al.  Technology Readiness Levels-A White Paper , 1995 .

[9]  Terry L. Hardy,et al.  Technology issues associated with using densified hydrogen for space vehicles , 1992 .

[11]  William D. Greene,et al.  Propellant Densification for Shuttle: The SSME Perspective , 2002 .

[12]  William D. Greene,et al.  Propellant Densification for Launch Vehicles: Simulation and Testing 1999 , 1999 .

[13]  W. Greene,et al.  Testing of Densified Liquid Hydrogen Stratification in a Scale Model Propellant Tank , 1999 .

[14]  Adam J. Culler,et al.  A NEW DENSIFIED PROPELLANT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR AEROSPACE VEHICLES , 2002 .

[15]  T. Lak,et al.  Advancement in cryogenic propulsion system performance through propellant densification , 1996 .

[16]  Mark S. Haberbusch,et al.  Densified propellant technology - Fueling aerospace vehicles in the new era , 1997 .

[17]  Stephen Barsi,et al.  Numerical Investigation of LO2 and LCH4 Storage Tanks on the Lunar Surface , 2008 .

[18]  K. Timmerhaus.  Advances in Cryogenic Engineering , 2012 .