Stakeholder Engagement and Public Information Through Social Media: A Study of Canadian and American Public Transportation Agencies

This study uses theories on dialogic accounting to assess whether online interaction through social media is used as a mechanism of public information and stakeholder engagement by Canadian and American public transportation agencies. We embraced a quantitative methodology in which content analysis was performed on the Facebook and Twitter accounts of 35 transit operators in Canada and the United States. We categorized the contents of 1,222 Facebook posts and 2,615 tweets, assessed which level and what type of interaction was effectively reached for every category, tracked whether and how agencies reply to comments on their posts, and assessed the general tenor of the discussion. Our results show that public transportation agencies often take advantage of their presence on social media to provide the public with information on their services and to perform activities associated with stakeholder engagement. However, we have found some significant differences in the utilization of social media by public transportation agencies, all of which are discussed in the “Conclusion” section of this article. Twitter is most often used for public information messages, while Facebook appears to be used more to publish content in a dialogic perspective that creates two-way, collaborative conversations with users. In terms of practical implications, our study suggests that a broader and more continuous commitment to interaction between users and stakeholders on social media would create new opportunities for improving transparency and, indirectly, the services of public agencies.

[1]  Jesse F. Dillard,et al.  Critical accounting and communicative action: On the limits of consensual deliberation , 2013 .

[2]  R. Denhardt,et al.  The New Public Service: An Approach to Reform , 2003 .

[3]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[4]  S. Osborne The new public governance? : emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance , 2010 .

[5]  Carol A. Adams,et al.  Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising , 2002 .

[6]  C. King,et al.  Transformational Public Service: Portraits of Theory in Practice , 2005 .

[7]  A. Farazmand Sound Governance: Engaging Citizens through Collaborative Organizations , 2012, Public Organization Review.

[8]  Curtin Ventriss Roward a public philosophy of public administration: a civic perspective of the public , 1997 .

[9]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less , 2010, ArXiv.

[10]  Duane Windsor,et al.  Stakeholder Responsibilities Lessons for Managers , 2002 .

[11]  J. Nalbandian Facilitating Community, Enabling Democracy: New Roles for Local Government Managers , 1999 .

[12]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[13]  D. Villa,et al.  Postmodernism and the Public Sphere , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Giacomo Manetti The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical evidence and critical points , 2011 .

[15]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local U.S. Governments , 2014 .

[16]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Accounting systems in organisational contexts: A case for critical theory , 1987 .

[17]  S. Bregman Uses of Social Media in Public Transportation , 2012 .

[18]  R. Kramer Government Is Us: Public Administration in an Anti‐Government Era , 1999 .

[19]  Michael Power,et al.  Habermas, law and accounting , 1996 .

[20]  Curtis Ventriss,et al.  Toward a Public Philosophy of Public Administration: A Civic Perspective of the Public , 1989 .

[21]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Technology–Task Coupling , 2016 .

[22]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[23]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics. , 1990 .

[24]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously? , 2005 .

[25]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[26]  Dennis M. Patten,et al.  Market reactions to the first‐time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters , 2010 .

[27]  Marie-France Turcotte,et al.  Path dependence and path creation: Framing the extra‐financial information market for a sustainable trajectory , 2009 .

[28]  William J. White,et al.  The relationship between Web site design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders , 2003 .

[29]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study Of Public Administration , 1971 .

[30]  Carsten Greve,et al.  Ideas in Public Management Reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, Value Creation and Involvement , 2015 .

[31]  Jordi Xifra,et al.  Nanoblogging PR: The discourse on public relations in Twitter , 2010 .

[32]  Dan L. Heitger,et al.  The Future of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Rapidly Growing Assurance Opportunity , 2006 .

[33]  Ian Hurd,et al.  LEGITIMACY IN THEORY , 2008 .

[34]  Brendan O'Dwyer,et al.  The construction of a social account: a case study in an overseas aid agency , 2005 .

[35]  C. King,et al.  The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration , 1998 .

[36]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Web 2.0 applications in government websites: prevalence, use and correlations with perceived website quality , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[37]  Judy Brown,et al.  Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously , 2009 .

[38]  Julian Teicher,et al.  Managing trust and relationships in PPPs: some Australian experiences , 2006 .

[39]  T. Kern,et al.  Social and Environmental Accounting and Accountability , 2011 .

[40]  C. Deegan Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation , 2002 .

[41]  Peter M. Clarkson,et al.  An examination of environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance , 2007 .

[42]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Digital Era Governance , 2006 .

[43]  P. Kline Models of man , 1986, Nature.

[44]  S. Dawes The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance , 2008 .

[45]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  The spirit of community : the reinvention of American society , 1994 .

[46]  Arto Haveri,et al.  Complexity in local government change , 2006 .

[47]  J. Habermas The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system - A critique of functionalist reason , 1990 .

[48]  Jörg Andriof,et al.  Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement , 2002 .

[49]  Trent Seltzer,et al.  Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders usin , 2010 .

[50]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Susan Greener,et al.  Business Research Methods , 2008 .

[52]  Mariglynn Edlins,et al.  Top 10 U.S. Municipal Police Departments and Their Social Media Usage , 2015 .

[53]  J. Dillard,et al.  The rules are no game: From instrumental rationality to administrative evil , 2005 .

[54]  J. B. Rosener Making Bureaucrats Responsive: A Study of the Impact of Citizen Participation and Staff Recommendations on Regulatory Decision Making , 1982 .

[55]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[56]  J. Habermas The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[57]  Liang Ma Diffusion and Assimilation of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese cities , 2012 .

[58]  Nancy C. Roberts,et al.  The Age of Direct Citizen Participation , 2008 .

[59]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach , 2007 .

[60]  Jesse Dillard,et al.  Taking pluralism seriously:Embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems , 2011 .

[61]  Hyojung Park,et al.  Relationship building and the use of Web sites: How Fortune 500 corporations use their Web sites to build relationships ☆ , 2008 .

[62]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Computing and Public Organizations , 1986 .

[63]  S. Waddock Leading Corporate Citizens: Vision, Values, Value Added , 2001 .

[64]  Jesse F. Dillard,et al.  Agonizing over engagement: SEA and the “death of environmentalism” debates , 2013 .

[65]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[66]  R. Gray The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society. Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? , 2002 .

[67]  Ann Svendsen,et al.  The Stakeholder Strategy: Profiting from Collaborative Business Realtionships , 1998 .

[68]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[69]  Eran Vigoda New Public Management , 2007 .

[70]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[71]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[72]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving , 2008 .

[73]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Social Media in the Public Sector , 2013 .

[74]  Tina Nabatchi,et al.  Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration , 2010 .

[75]  Wendy L. Tate,et al.  CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORTS: A THEMATIC ANALYSIS RELATED TO SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2010 .

[76]  Kasisomayajula Viswanath,et al.  Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[77]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Consumers, Companies and Virtual Social Worlds: a Qualitative Analysis of Second Life , 2009 .

[78]  Jeffrey Unerman,et al.  Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? , 2004 .

[79]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[80]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[81]  R. Denhardt,et al.  The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering , 2002 .

[82]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 , 2008, First Monday.

[83]  M. Bellucci,et al.  The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting , 2016 .

[84]  B. Frame,et al.  Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models , 2007 .

[85]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  An empirical examination of the complex relationships between entrepreneurial orientation and stakeholder support , 2005 .

[86]  Richard D. Waters,et al.  Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations Twitter updates , 2011 .

[87]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Government 2.0 Revisited: Social Media Strategies in the Public Sector , 2010 .

[88]  Lara C. Stache,et al.  Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age , 2012, Rhetoric and Public Affairs.

[89]  T. Bovaird Developing New Forms of Partnership With the `Market¿ in the Procurement of Public Services , 2006 .

[90]  Christine Coupland,et al.  Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based reports: Currency in the banking sector? , 2006 .

[91]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[92]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[93]  Judy Brown,et al.  Agonistic Pluralism and Imagining CSEAR into the Future , 2012 .

[94]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Critical reflections on research approaches, accounting regulation and the regulation of accounting☆ , 2007 .

[95]  Andreas M. Kaplan,et al.  Social media: back to the roots and back to the future , 2012, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[96]  Ernest Allen,et al.  Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America , 1986 .

[97]  Colin Seymour-Ure,et al.  Content Analysis in Communication Research. , 1972 .

[98]  Ines Mergel,et al.  A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[99]  F. C. P. Motta The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[100]  R. Denhardt,et al.  The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering , 2000 .

[101]  A. Meijer,et al.  Social Media and the New Organization of Government Communications , 2016 .