A finite difference approach to the infinity Laplace equation and tug-of-war games

We present a modified version of the two-player "tug-of-war" game introduced by Peres, Schramm, Sheffield, and Wilson. This new tug-of-war game is identical to the original except near the boundary of the domain $\partial \Omega$, but its associated value functions are more regular. The dynamic programming principle implies that the value functions satisfy a certain finite difference equation. By studying this difference equation directly and adapting techniques from viscosity solution theory, we prove a number of new results. We show that the finite difference equation has unique maximal and minimal solutions, which are identified as the value functions for the two tug-of-war players. We demonstrate uniqueness, and hence the existence of a value for the game, in the case that the running payoff function is nonnegative. We also show that uniqueness holds in certain cases for sign-changing running payoff functions which are sufficiently small. In the limit $\epsilon \to 0$, we obtain the convergence of the value functions to a viscosity solution of the normalized infinity Laplace equation. We also obtain several new results for the normalized infinity Laplace equation $-\Delta_\infty u = f$. In particular, we demonstrate the existence of solutions to the Dirichlet problem for any bounded continuous $f$, and continuous boundary data, as well as the uniqueness of solutions to this problem in the generic case. We present a new elementary proof of uniqueness in the case that $f>0$, $f< 0$, or $f\equiv 0$. The stability of the solutions with respect to $f$ is also studied, and an explicit continuous dependence estimate from $f\equiv 0$ is obtained.

[1]  Yuval Peres,et al.  Biased tug-of-war, the biased infinity Laplacian, and comparison with exponential cones , 2008, 0811.0208.

[2]  An existence result for the infinity laplacian with non-homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions using Tug-of-War games , 2009, 0907.1250.

[3]  Peiyong Wang,et al.  Uniqueness of ∞-Harmonic Functions and the Eikonal Equation , 2007 .

[4]  Y. Peres,et al.  Tug-of-war and the infinity Laplacian , 2006, math/0605002.

[5]  E. N. Barron,et al.  The infinity Laplacian, Aronsson’s equation and their generalizations , 2008 .

[6]  E. Gruyer,et al.  ar 2 00 4 On Absolutely Minimizing Lipschitz Extensions and PDE ∆ ∞ ( u ) = 0 , 2004 .

[7]  R. Jensen Uniqueness of Lipschitz extensions: Minimizing the sup norm of the gradient , 1993 .

[8]  L. Evans The perturbed test function method for viscosity solutions of nonlinear PDE , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics.

[9]  M. Crandall,et al.  A TOUR OF THE THEORY OF ABSOLUTELY MINIMIZING FUNCTIONS , 2004 .

[10]  A PDE Perspective of the Normalized Infinity Laplacian , 2008 .

[11]  Erwan Le Gruyer On absolutely minimizing lipschitz extensions and PDE $$\Delta_\infty (u) = 0$$ , 2004 .

[12]  Fernando Charro,et al.  A mixed problem for the infinity Laplacian via Tug-of-War games , 2007, 0706.4267.

[13]  Charles K. Smart,et al.  An easy proof of Jensen’s theorem on the uniqueness of infinity harmonic functions , 2009, 0906.3325.

[14]  P. Lions,et al.  User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations , 1992, math/9207212.

[15]  G. Barles,et al.  EXISTENCE AND COMPARISON RESULTS FOR FULLY NONLINEAR DEGENERATE ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITHOUT ZEROTH-ORDER TERM* , 2001 .

[16]  G. Lu,et al.  INFINITY LAPLACE EQUATION WITH NON-TRIVIAL RIGHT-HAND SIDE , 2010 .

[17]  Michael G. Crandall A Visit with the ∞-Laplace Equation , 2008 .

[18]  L. Evans,et al.  Optimal Lipschitz extensions and the infinity laplacian , 2001 .

[19]  Yifeng Yu Uniqueness of values of Aronsson operators and running costs in “tug-of-war” games , 2009, 0906.0627.

[20]  Adam M. Oberman A convergent difference scheme for the infinity Laplacian: construction of absolutely minimizing Lipschitz extensions , 2004, Math. Comput..