Technological progress and productivity growth in the U.S. mobile telecommunications industry

The fast growing U.S. mobile wireless industry has been experiencing dramatic technological change and substantial competition. As a result of these catalysts, we argue that wireless firms have experienced significant productivity improvement and provide new evidence that technological progress almost exclusively contributed to productivity improvements in the wireless industry by significantly expanding the production possibilities set. We employ nonparametric estimation procedures based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) that utilize input-output data from a representative sample of 16 firms in the mobile wireless industry to estimate productivity change, technological change, and relative efficiency change for the period spanning the years from 2000 to 2002. Our findings show that the industry experienced a significant growth of 13% in productivity, which was primarily due to an average technological progress of 9.9% in the industry. Additionally, we find that national wireless operators experienced significantly higher productivity growth and contributed more to technological progress than regional providers. Firms that were industry pioneers as evidenced by high market share at the beginning of our sample period experienced higher productivity growth and greater technological progress compared to firms with lower initial market share. Moreover, the industry experienced significantly higher productivity growth and technical progress in the later sample period between 2001 and 2002 than in the early period between 2000 and 2001.

[1]  Yan Peng,et al.  Competition and production efficiency: Telecommunications in OECD countries , 2001, Information Economics and Policy.

[2]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  An economic analysis of the US wireless telephone industry: responses to new technologies , 1999, Telematics Informatics.

[3]  Jiro Nemoto,et al.  Scale economies, technical change and productivity growth in Japanese local telecommunications services , 2002 .

[4]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[5]  Heli A. Koski,et al.  Convergence in telecommunications infrastructure development in OECD countries , 2000, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[6]  M. Fuss,et al.  Productivity Growth in Canadian Telecommunications , 1994 .

[7]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Does new technology adoption pay? Electronic switching patterns and firm-level performance in US telecommunications , 1995 .

[8]  G. C. Pentzaropoulos,et al.  Evaluating productive efficiency in telecommunications: evidence from Greece , 2000 .

[9]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Productivity Change, Technical Progress, and Relative Efficiency Change in the Public Accounting Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Mieko Nishimizu Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change : dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia, 1965-1978 , 1982 .

[11]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2008, Oper. Res..

[12]  Noel D. Uri,et al.  Productivity Change, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Improvement in Telecommunications , 2001 .

[13]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[15]  Gary Madden,et al.  Telecommunications productivity, catch-up and innovation , 1999 .