Contamination Rate of Burnt Necrotic Tissue after Electrocoagulation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the commonly found catastrophic complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, proper skin cleansing, shortened operative time, and sterility of surgical field and equipment are essential to minimize the risk of PJI. Although bacterial contamination of electrocautery tips has been reported, contamination of residual product of electrocoagulation, burnt necrotic tissue (BNT), is not well known. Therefore, we aimed to assess the contamination rate of BNT and association between contaminated BNT and PJI, and risk factors. Methods BNTs from 183 patients who had undergone unilateral primary TKA at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. In each patient, three to five specimens of BNT were routinely collected in the operative field of primary TKA. Collecting time was defined as the duration from start of using the electrocautery device to the first collection of BNT. Results Culture was positive in eight of 183 patients (4.4%; contaminated BNT group), and the most commonly isolated organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (62.5%). The average operative time was 103.1 ± 44.2 minutes in the contaminated BNT group and 79.0 ± 16.7 minutes in the non-contaminated BNT group (p = 0.17), and collecting time was 48.0 ± 44.3 minutes and 29.7 ± 17.0 minutes (p = 0.28), respectively. None of the patients with contaminated BNT developed PJI, whereas four patients with culture-negative BNT developed PJI within 2 postoperative years. Conclusions BNT in surgical field can become a reservoir of contaminating bacteria. However, contamination of BNT was not associated with PJI. Therefore, routine removal of all BNTs may be unnecessary.

[1]  P. Lin,et al.  Knee joint function, walking ability and quality of life within 6 weeks after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study. , 2019, Journal of clinical nursing.

[2]  N. Tammachote,et al.  Electric cautery does not reduce blood loss in primary total knee arthroplasty compared with scalpel only surgery a double-blinded randomized controlled trial , 2018, International Orthopaedics.

[3]  T. Gehrke,et al.  High bacterial contamination rate of electrocautery tips during total hip and knee arthroplasty , 2018, International Orthopaedics.

[4]  I. Gross,et al.  Effects of tranexamic acid and bipolar sealer alone or in combination in primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial , 2016, Arthroplasty today.

[5]  E. Sheehan,et al.  Bacterial contamination of diathermy tips used during orthopaedic procedures , 2015 .

[6]  M. Austin,et al.  Bacterial Contamination in Tips of Electrocautery Devices During Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  L. Ciric,et al.  Biochemical and microbial contamination of surgical devices: a quantitative analysis. , 2015, American journal of infection control.

[8]  P. Svensson,et al.  Bacterial contamination of suction catheter tips during aortic valve replacement surgery: a prospective observational cohort study , 2015, Patient Safety in Surgery.

[9]  N. Saadé,et al.  Electrocautery-induced localized colonic injury elicits increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in small bowel and decreases jejunal alanine absorption. , 2015, Cytokine.

[10]  M. Froimson,et al.  Perioperative skin preparation. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  F. Catani,et al.  Perioperative antibiotics. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[13]  Elena Losina,et al.  Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  A Gregori,et al.  Surgical site infections linked to contaminated surgical instruments. , 2012, The Journal of hospital infection.

[15]  N. Frebourg,et al.  Surgical glove bacterial contamination and perforation during total hip arthroplasty implantation: when gloves should be changed. , 2012, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[16]  N. A. Al Laham,et al.  Prevalence of bacterial contamination in general operating theaters in selected hospitals in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. , 2012, Journal of infection and public health.

[17]  J. Parvizi Periprosthetic joint infection. , 2011, Orthopedics.

[18]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Preventing infection in total joint arthroplasty. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Rafael Queiroz de Souza,et al.  Analysis of the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries. , 2010, American journal of infection control.

[20]  Daniel Berry,et al.  Prosthetic Joint Infection Risk after TKA in the Medicare Population , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  Steven M. Kurtz,et al.  The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  G. de Lissovoy,et al.  Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. , 2009, American journal of infection control.

[23]  P. Symeonidis,et al.  Suction during orthopaedic surgery. How safe is the suction tip? , 2008, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[24]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  W. Rutala,et al.  Draft Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities , 2002 .

[26]  A. Gutow Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  R. Villar Knee replacement. , 1990, The Practitioner.

[28]  J. E. Sebben The hazards of electrosurgery. , 1987, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.