Characterizing the effects of cell settling on bioprinter output

The time variation in bioprinter output, i.e. the number of cells per printed drop, was studied over the length of a typical printing experiment. This variation impacts the cell population size of bioprinted samples, which should ideally be consistent. The variation in output was specifically studied in the context of cell settling. The bioprinter studied is based on the thermal inkjet HP26A cartridge; however, the results are relevant to other cell delivery systems that draw fluid from a reservoir. A simple mathematical model suggests that the cell concentration in the bottom of the reservoir should increase linearly over time, up to some maximum, and that the cell output should be proportional to this concentration. Two studies were performed in which D1 murine stem cells and similarly sized polystyrene latex beads were printed. The bead output profiles were consistent with the model. The cell output profiles initially followed the increasing trend predicted by the settling model, but after several minutes the cell output peaked and then decreased. The decrease in cell output was found to be associated with the number of use cycles the cartridge had experienced. The differing results for beads and cells suggest that a biological process, such as adhesion, causes the decrease in cell output. Further work will be required to identify the exact process.

[1]  N Madigan,et al.  Effects of sonication on electrode surfaces and metal particles , 1996 .

[2]  Jong-Hwan Lee,et al.  Three-dimensional bioprinting of rat embryonic neural cells , 2009, Neuroreport.

[3]  Timothy C. Burg,et al.  Cell settling effects on a thermal inkjet bioprinter , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Wei Sun,et al.  Effects of Dispensing Pressure and Nozzle Diameter on Cell Survival from Solid Freeform Fabrication–Based Direct Cell Writing , 2008 .

[5]  Makoto Nakamura,et al.  Development of an effective three dimensional fabrication technique using inkjet technology for tissue model samples , 2006 .

[6]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Kinetics and kinematics for translational motions in microgravity during parabolic flight. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  B. Derby,et al.  Delivery of human fibroblast cells by piezoelectric drop-on-demand inkjet printing. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[8]  Richard E. Groff,et al.  Design and implementation of a two-dimensional inkjet bioprinter , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Matthew E. Pepper,et al.  EDTA enhances high‐throughput two‐dimensional bioprinting by inhibiting salt scaling and cell aggregation at the nozzle surface , 2009, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[10]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Layer by layer three-dimensional tissue epitaxy by cell-laden hydrogel droplets. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[11]  Tao Xu,et al.  Construction of high‐density bacterial colony arrays and patterns by the ink‐jet method , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  J. Belovich,et al.  A simple apparatus for measuring cell settling velocity , 2010, Biotechnology progress.

[13]  K. Cheung,et al.  Effects of surfactant and gentle agitation on inkjet dispensing of living cells , 2010, Biofabrication.

[14]  Karl R Edminster,et al.  Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[15]  R. Tobey,et al.  Density invariance of cultured Chinese hamster cells with stage of the mitotic cycle. , 1970, Biophysical journal.