An assessment of radical prostatectomy. Time trends, geographic variation, and outcomes. The Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.

OBJECTIVES To examine temporal trends and geographic variation in radical prostatectomy rates and short-term outcomes. DESIGN Population-based study of radical prostatectomy for the years 1984 through 1990. Poisson regression was used to estimate temporal and regional effects. SETTING The 50 states and the District of Columbia. PARTICIPANTS A 20% national sample of male Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rate of radical prostatectomy; 30-day mortality; and major cardiopulmonary complications, vascular complications, or surgical repairs within 30 days of radical prostatectomy. RESULTS A total of 10,598 radical prostatectomies were identified. The adjusted rate of radical prostatectomy in 1990 was 5.75 times that in 1984. The relative increase was similar in all age groups. Substantial geographic variation existed in rates from 1988 through 1990: all states in the New England and Mid-Atlantic regions had rates equal to or below 60 per 100,000 male Medicare beneficiaries, while all states in the Pacific and Mountain regions had rates equal to or above 130 per 100,000. The mortality and morbidity after radical prostatectomy are not trivial for older men (aged 75 years and older)--almost 2% died and nearly 8% suffered major cardiopulmonary complications within 30 days of the operation. CONCLUSION The sharp increase and wide geographic variation in radical prostatectomy rates make the evaluation of this surgical procedure a pressing issue. The rising rate of radical prostatectomy among men aged 75 years and older merits special attention.

[1]  J. Berg,et al.  The contribution of subclinical cancer to Denver's high prostatic cancer incidence rate. , 1985, Journal of Chronic Diseases.

[2]  F. Hinman Screening for prostatic carcinoma. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[3]  L. Kessler,et al.  Rise in prostatic cancer incidence associated with increased use of transurethral resection. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  R. Thompson Carcinoma of the prostate. , 1922, Southern medicine and surgery.

[5]  M. Barry,et al.  A decision analysis of alternative treatment strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team. , 1993, JAMA.

[6]  Controversies in management of apparently localized carcinoma of prostate. , 1989, Urology.

[7]  Rupert G. Miller,et al.  Survival Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  P. Walsh,et al.  Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle. , 1987, The Journal of urology.

[9]  R. Beart,et al.  Trends in patterns of care for prostatic cancer, 1974-1983: results of surveys by the American College of Surgeons. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[10]  P. Clifford,et al.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  I. Thompson Carcinoma of the Prostate: Changing Incidence Associated With Annual Urologic Screening , 1989, Southern medical journal.

[12]  T. Tong,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1993 , 1993, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.