Electric images of two low resistance objects in weakly electric fish.

Electroreceptive fish detect nearby objects by processing the information contained in the pattern of electric currents through their skin. In weakly electric fish, these currents arise from a self-generated field (the electric organ discharge), depending on the electrical properties of the surrounding medium. The electric image can be defined as the pattern of transepidermal voltage distributed over the receptive surface. To understand electrolocation it is necessary to know how electric image of objects are generated. In pulse mormyrids, the electric organ is localized at the tail, far from the receptors and fires a short biphasic pulse. Consequently, if all the elements in the environment are resistive, the stimulus at every point on the skin has the same waveform. Then, any measure of the amplitude (for example, the peak to peak amplitude) could be the unique parameter of the stimulus at any point of the skin. We have developed a model to calculate the image, corroborating that images are spread over the whole sensory surface and have an opposite center-surround, "Mexican-hat" shape. As a consequence, the images of different objects superimpose. We show theoretically and by simulation that the image of a pair of objects is not the simple addition of the individual images of these objects.

[1]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory, Third Edition , 1989, Springer Series in Information Sciences.

[2]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The electric organ discharges of the gymnotiform fishes: I. Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Differential responses of two types of electroreceptive afferents to signal distortions may permit capacitance measurement in a weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The effects of simple objects on the electric field of Apteronotus , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  C. Bell,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: physical images of resistive objects in Gnathonemus petersii. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[7]  C. Bell,et al.  Sensory coding and corollary discharge effects in mormyrid electric fish. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  N. Hoshimiya,et al.  TheApteronotus EOD field: Waveform and EOD field simulation , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[9]  G. R. Noakes University Physics , 1942, Nature.

[10]  A. Caputi,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: perception of objects of complex impedance. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  P. Hunter,et al.  FEM/BEM NOTES , 2001 .

[12]  Ruben Budelli,et al.  Electric fish measure distance in the dark , 1998, Nature.

[13]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Electrolocation of objects in the electric fishEigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei) , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  Christopher Assad,et al.  Electric field maps and boundary element simulations of electrolocation in weakly electric fish , 1997 .

[15]  A. Caputi,et al.  Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: differences between self-generated and conspecific-generated signal carriers. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  M. Brereton Classical Electrodynamics (2nd edn) , 1976 .

[17]  W. Yost Auditory image perception and analysis: The basis for hearing , 1991, Hearing Research.