Activation of phonological competitors in visual search.

Recently, Meyer, Belke, Telling and Humphreys (2007) reported that competitor objects with homophonous names (e.g., boy) interfere with identifying a target object (e.g., buoy) in a visual search task, suggesting that an object name's phonology becomes automatically activated even in situations in which participants do not have the intention to speak. The present study explored the generality of this finding by testing a different phonological relation (rhyming object names, e.g., cat-hat) and by varying details of the experimental procedure. Experiment 1 followed the procedure by Meyer et al. Participants were familiarized with target and competitor objects and their names at the beginning of the experiment and the picture of the target object was presented prior to the search display on each trial. In Experiment 2, the picture of the target object presented prior to the search display was replaced by its name. In Experiment 3, participants were not familiarized with target and competitor objects and their names at the beginning of the experiment. A small interference effect from phonologically related competitors was obtained in Experiments 1 and 2 but not in Experiment 3, suggesting that the way the relevant objects are introduced to participants affects the chances of observing an effect from phonologically related competitors. Implications for the information flow in the conceptual-lexical system are discussed.

[1]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Exploring the Activation of Semantic and Phonological Codes during Speech Planning with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Semantic Interference in Visual Search , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[4]  A. Roelofs Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Albert Costa,et al.  Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access , 2005 .

[6]  Eva Belke,et al.  Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code? , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[9]  Malte C. Viebahn,et al.  Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[13]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[14]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  Phonological priming and cohort effects in toddlers , 2011, Cognition.

[17]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: new evidence from dual-task experiments. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Marc F. Joanisse,et al.  Specific phonological impairments in dyslexia revealed by eyetracking , 2006, Cognition.

[19]  J. McQueen,et al.  Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized. , 2012, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Conceptual coherence affects phonological activation of context objects during object naming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Albert Costa,et al.  Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[23]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  The time course of working memory effects on visual attention , 2010 .

[24]  K. Plunkett,et al.  In the Infant’s Mind’s Ear , 2010, Psychological science.

[25]  Michael E J Masson,et al.  A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[26]  Jan Rouke Kuipers,et al.  The limitations of cascading in the speech production system , 2009 .

[27]  Audrey K. Kittredge,et al.  Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[28]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[29]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Falk Huettig,et al.  The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search , 2007 .

[31]  A. Meyer,et al.  Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[32]  David Soto,et al.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Eva Belke,et al.  Early activation of object names in visual search , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Anja Hahne,et al.  Phonological activation of category coordinates during speech planning is observable in children but not in adults: evidence for cascaded processing. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Ease of processing constrains the activation flow in the conceptual-lexical system during speech planning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Mart Bles,et al.  Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[37]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Looking, language, and memory: bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[38]  Frank Oppermann,et al.  Resolving competition when naming an object in a multiple-object display , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.