Re-Finding Found Things: An Exploratory Study of How Users Re-Find Information

The problem of how people find information is studied extensively; however, the problem of how people organize, re-use, and re-find information that they have found is not as well understood. Recently, several projects have conducted in-situ studies to explore how people re-find and re-use information. Here, we present results and observations from a controlled, laboratory study of refinding information found on the web. Our study was conducted as a collaborative exercise with pairs of participants. One participant acted as a retriever, helping the other participant re-find information by telephone. This design allowed us to gain insight into the strategies that users employed to re-find information, and into how domain artifacts and contextual information were used to aid the re-finding process. We also introduced the ability for users to add their own explicitly artifacts in the form of making annotations on the web pages they viewed. We observe that re-finding often occurs as a two stage, iterative process in which users first attempt to locate an information source (search), and once found, begin a process to find the specific information being sought (browse). Our findings are consistent with research on waypoints; orienteering approaches to re-finding; and navigation of electronic spaces. Furthermore, we observed that annotations were utilized extensively, indicating that explicitly added context by the user can play an important role in re-finding.

[1]  Bradley J. Rhodes,et al.  Margin notes: building a contextually aware associative memory , 2000, IUI '00.

[2]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Surviving the Information Explosion: How People Find Their Electronic Information , 2003 .

[3]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  How to Build Modeling Agents to Support Web Searchers , 1997 .

[4]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Training Agents to Recognize Text by Example , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[5]  Thomas Bonura,et al.  From documents to objects: an overview of LiveDoc , 1998, SGCH.

[6]  Thomas Bonura,et al.  Drop zones: an extension to LiveDoc , 1998, SGCH.

[7]  Keith Oatley,et al.  Information Flow in a User Interface: the Effect of Experience and Context on the Recall of MacWrite Screens , 1988, BCS HCI.

[8]  Steve Lawrence,et al.  Context in Web Search , 2000, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[9]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Collaborative, programmable intelligent agents , 1998, CACM.

[10]  Thad Starner,et al.  Remembrance Agent: A Continuously Running Automated Information Retrieval System , 1996, PAAM.

[11]  Naren Ramakrishnan,et al.  The Traits of the Personable , 2002, ITWP.

[12]  David R. Karger,et al.  Haystack: per-user information environments , 1999, CIKM '99.

[13]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Keeping found things found on the web , 2001, CIKM '01.

[14]  Serge Abiteboul,et al.  Inferring structure in semistructured data , 1997, SGMD.

[15]  Serge Abiteboul,et al.  Querying Semi-Structured Data , 1997, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[16]  Milind S. Pandit,et al.  The Selection Recognition Agent: instant access to relevant information and operations , 1998, Knowl. Based Syst..

[17]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Navigation in electronic worlds: a CHI 97 workshop , 1997, SGCH.

[18]  Kristian J. Hammond,et al.  User interactions with everyday applications as context for just-in-time information access , 2000, IUI '00.

[19]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Collaborating on contributions to conversations , 1987 .

[20]  Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones,et al.  WebContext: remote access to shared context , 2001, PUI '01.

[21]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere , 2001, TCHI.