A New Vision on Smart and Resilient Urban Mobility in the Aftermath of the Pandemic: Key Factors on European Transport Policies
暂无分享,去创建一个
Giuseppe Inturri | Matteo Ignaccolo | Tiziana Campisi | Antonino Canale | Chiara Garau | Mauro Coni | Vincenza Torrisi | T. Campisi | A. Canale | C. Garau | M. Ignaccolo | G. Inturri | V. Torrisi | M. Coni
[1] Hrvoje Pandžić,et al. Electric vehicle based smart e-mobility system – Definition and comparison to the existing concept , 2020 .
[2] M. Coelho,et al. Carpooling as an Immediate Strategy to Post-Lockdown Mobility: A Case Study in University Campuses , 2021, Sustainability.
[3] Tiziana Campisi,et al. Bivariate Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Upcoming Personal Mobility Vehicles (PMVs) in Palermo , 2020, ICCSA.
[4] Giuseppe Inturri,et al. Improving inbound logistic planning for large-scale real-world routing problems: a novel ant-colony simulation-based optimization , 2020 .
[5] Giuseppe Inturri,et al. “Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans”: Key Concepts and a Critical Revision on SUMPs Guidelines , 2020, ICCSA.
[6] Francesco Pinna,et al. Vulnerable Users and Public Transport Service: Analysis on Expected and Perceived Quality Data , 2020, ICCSA.
[7] Kh. Md. Nahiduzzaman,et al. Gender-Responsive Public Transportation in the Dammam Metropolitan Region, Saudi Arabia , 2020, Sustainability.
[8] Claudia Yamu,et al. A walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space syntax: the case study of Iglesias, Italy , 2020, European Planning Studies.
[9] Tannaz Monfaredzadeh,et al. Investigating Social Factors of Sustainability in a Smart City , 2015 .
[10] Sang Ho Lee,et al. Sejong Smart City: On the Road to Be a City of the Future , 2019, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography.
[11] S. Hoogendoorn,et al. Preferences toward Bus Alternatives in Rural Areas of the Netherlands: A Stated Choice Experiment , 2021, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
[12] Tiziana Campisi,et al. The Development of Decarbonisation Strategies: A Three-Step Methodology for the Suitable Analysis of Current EVCS Locations Applied to Istanbul, Turkey , 2021, Energies.
[13] R. Shaw,et al. An integrated approach to sustainable development, National Resilience, and COVID-19 responses: The case of Japan , 2020, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.
[14] G. Tesoriere,et al. The Development of Strategies to Reduce Exhaust Emissions from Passenger Cars in Rzeszow City—Poland. A Preliminary Assessment of the Results Produced by the Increase of E-Fleet , 2021, Energies.
[15] Michela Le Pira,et al. Public Engagement for Designing New Transport Services: Investigating Citizen Preferences from a Multiple Criteria Perspective , 2019, Transportation Research Procedia.
[16] Paolo Nesi,et al. A Big Data Platform for Smart and Sustainable Cities: Environmental Monitoring Case Studies in Europe , 2020, ICCSA.
[17] Francesco Pinna,et al. How has Cagliari Changed Its Citizens in Smart Citizens? Exploring the Influence of ITS Technology on Urban Social Interactions , 2018, ICCSA.
[18] Giovanni Tesoriere,et al. Best–Worst Method for Modelling Mobility Choice after COVID-19: Evidence from Italy , 2020, Sustainability.
[19] G. Tesoriere,et al. Innovative solutions for sustainable mobility in areas of weak demand. Some factors influencing the implementation of the DRT system in Enna (Italy) , 2021 .
[20] Xiaoling Zhang,et al. Achieving resilience through smart cities? Evidence from China , 2021 .
[21] N. Giuffrida,et al. The queensway of New York city. A proposal for sustainable mobility in queens , 2018, Town and Infrastructure Planning for Safety and Urban Quality.
[22] Ilaria Henke,et al. Towards E-mobility: Strengths and Weaknesses of Electric Vehicles , 2020, AINA Workshops.
[23] S. Ghodmare,et al. Compact City and Related Impact on Sustainable Development in Urban Areas , 2020 .
[24] Giuseppe Inturri,et al. Structuring transport decision-making problems through stakeholder engagement: The case of Catania metro accessibility , 2017 .
[25] Giuseppe Inturri,et al. Innovative Transport Systems to Promote Sustainable Mobility: Developing the Model Architecture of a Traffic Control and Supervisor System , 2018, ICCSA.
[26] Giuseppe Inturri,et al. Exploring the factors affecting bike-sharing demand: evidence from student perceptions, usage patterns and adoption barriers , 2021 .
[27] J. Rouwendal,et al. Does improving public transport decrease car ownership? Evidence from a residential sorting model for the Copenhagen metropolitan area , 2020, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
[28] M. Tatar,et al. Cities4ZERO: Overcoming Carbon Lock-in in Municipalities through Smart Urban Transformation Processes , 2020 .
[29] Giuseppe Inturri,et al. University propensity assessment to car sharing services using mixed survey data: the Italian case study of Enna city , 2020 .
[30] G. Tesoriere,et al. Exploring Public Opinion on Personal Mobility Vehicle Use: A Case Study in Palermo, Italy , 2020, Sustainability.
[31] Michela Le Pira,et al. Taxi vs. demand responsive shared transport systems: An agent-based simulation approach , 2021 .
[32] Jie Yang,et al. Exploring Co-Modality Using On-Demand Transport Systems , 2016 .
[33] Tiziana Campisi,et al. The MAAS development as a mobility solution based on the individual needs of transport users , 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING 2019 (ICCMSE-2019).
[34] Giuseppe Inturri,et al. The Growing Urban Accessibility: A Model to Measure the Car Sharing Effectiveness Based on Parking Distances , 2020, ICCSA.
[35] Araz Taeihagh,et al. Autonomous Vehicles for Smart and Sustainable Cities: An In-Depth Exploration of Privacy and Cybersecurity Implications , 2018, ArXiv.
[36] Chiara Garau,et al. Governing technology-based urbanism , 2020 .
[37] Alfonso Annunziata,et al. A Literature Review on Walkability and its Theoretical Framework. Emerging Perspectives for Research Developments , 2020, ICCSA.
[38] G. Tesoriere,et al. Evaluation of walkability and mobility requirements of visually impaired people in urban spaces , 2020 .
[39] Piotr Czech,et al. The concept of a walkable city as an alternative form of urban mobility , 2017 .
[40] PUMPNET: a deep learning approach to pump operation detection , 2021 .
[41] Alessandro Olivo,et al. Standing Passenger Comfort: A New Scale for Evaluating the Real-Time Driving Style of Bus Transit Services , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[42] Tiziana Campisi,et al. The Benefit of Engage the "Crowd" Encouraging a Bottom-up Approach for Shared Mobility Rating , 2020, ICCSA.
[43] Chiara Garau,et al. Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement with Online and Face-to-Face Participation - A Case Study , 2012, Future Internet.
[44] Matteo Ignaccolo,et al. Toward a sustainable mobility through. A dynamic real-time traffic monitoring, estimation and forecasting system: The RE.S.E.T. project , 2018 .
[45] G. Tesoriere,et al. Continue to share? An overview on italian travel behavior before and after the COVID-19 lockdown , 2021 .
[46] M. A. Javid,et al. Exploring the Traveler’s Intentions to Use Public Transport during the COVID-19 Pandemic While Complying with Precautionary Measures , 2021, Applied Sciences.
[47] Cristina C. Amitrano,et al. ICT and sustainability in smart cities management , 2016 .
[48] S. Rossetti,et al. Urban Policies and Planning Approaches for a Safer and Climate Friendlier Mobility in Cities: Strategies, Initiatives and Some Analysis , 2021, Sustainability.
[49] Francesco Pinna,et al. Cagliari and smart urban mobility: Analysis and comparison , 2016 .
[50] Mauro Romanelli,et al. Analysing the role of information technology towards sustainable cities living , 2020, Kybernetes.
[51] Tiziana Campisi,et al. How to Create Walking Friendly Cities. A Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Central Open Market Area of Rijeka , 2020, Sustainability.
[52] A. Cartenì,et al. Strong Sustainability in Public Transport Policies: An e-Mobility Bus Fleet Application in Sorrento Peninsula (Italy) , 2020, Sustainability.
[53] C. Garau,et al. Strategies and actions towards sustainability: Encouraging good ITS practices in the SUMP vision , 2021 .
[54] Giulio Maternini,et al. On-Board Comfort of Different Age Passengers and Bus-Lane Characteristics , 2020, ICCSA.
[55] G. De Nunzio,et al. Road Traffic Dynamic Pollutant Emissions Estimation: From Macroscopic Road Information to Microscopic Environmental Impact , 2020, Atmosphere.
[56] M. Ignaccolo,et al. Introducing a mobility on demand system beyond COVID-19: Evidences from users’ perspective , 2021 .
[57] Tiziana Campisi,et al. Cities under Pressure: Strategies and Tools to Face Climate Change and Pandemic , 2020, Sustainability.
[58] G. Tesoriere,et al. Scaling the Potential of Compact City Development: The Case of Lahore, Pakistan , 2021, Sustainability.
[59] Zaheer Allam,et al. Future (post-COVID) digital, smart and sustainable cities in the wake of 6G: Digital twins, immersive realities and new urban economies , 2021 .
[60] M. Jeihani,et al. PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC , 2020, medRxiv.
[61] Maria Kamargianni,et al. Investigating heterogeneity in preferences for Mobility-as-a-Service plans through a latent class choice model , 2021, Travel Behaviour and Society.
[62] J. Jokinen,et al. How much flexibility does rural public transport need? – Implications from a fully flexible DRT system , 2021 .
[63] N. Stamatiadis,et al. Analysis of attitudes and engagement of shared e-scooter users , 2021 .
[64] Nina Hampl,et al. Electric Vehicles Ready for Breakthrough in MaaS? Consumer Adoption of E-Car Sharing and E-Scooter Sharing as a Part of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) , 2021, Energies.