Experimental Semiotics: an Engine of Discovery for Understanding Human Communication

The recent growth of Experimental Semiotics (ES) offers us a new option to investigate human communication. We briefly introduce ES, presenting results from three themes of research which emerged within it. Then we illustrate the contribution ES can make to the investigation of human communication systems, particularly in comparison with the other existing options. This comparison highlights how ES can provide an engine of discovery for understanding human communication. In fact, in complementing the other options, ES offers us unique opportunities to test assumptions about communicative behavior, both through the experimenters' planned manipulations and through the unexpected behaviors humans exhibit in experimental settings. We provide three examples of such opportunities, one from each of the three research themes we present.

[1]  G. Tresise.  Evolution on planet Earth: the impact of the physical environment , 2008 .

[2]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Nonequilibrium dynamics of language games on complex networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  B. Keysar.  Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes , 2007 .

[4]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  H. H. Clark.  Coordinating with each other in a material world , 2005 .

[6]  James R. Hurford,et al.  Biological evolution of the Saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device , 1989 .

[7]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Natural Language From Artificial Life , 2002, Artificial Life.

[9]  Luc Steels,et al.  Modeling the Formation of Language: Embodied Experiments , 2010, Evolution of Communication and Language in Embodied Agents.

[10]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Meaningful call combinations in a non-human primate , 2008, Current Biology.

[11]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Complex Systems in Language Evolution: the Cultural Emergence of Compositional Structure , 2003, Adv. Complex Syst..

[12]  Matthew Quinn,et al.  Evolving Communication without Dedicated Communication Channels , 2001, ECAL.

[13]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Experimental Semiotics: A Review , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  J. Kegl.  Creation through contact : Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua , 1999 .

[16]  M. Engelmann.  The Philosophical Investigations , 2013 .

[17]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Exploring the cognitive infrastructure of communication , 2012 .

[18]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Evolution of Communication and Language in Embodied Agents , 2009 .

[19]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzees Are Rational Maximizers in an Ultimatum Game , 2007, Science.

[20]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures , 1998, Nature.

[21]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Syntax out of Learning: The Cultural Evolution of Structured Communication in a Population of Induction Algorithms , 1999, ECAL.

[22]  S. Garrod,et al.  Experimental semiotics: a new approach for studying the emergence and the evolution of human communication , 2010 .

[23]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  Experimental Semiotics: A New Approach for Studying Communication as a Form of Joint Action , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[25]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Interactive Evolution of Human Communication Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Gareth Roberts,et al.  An experimental study of social selection and frequency of interaction in linguistic diversity , 2010 .

[27]  M. Nowak,et al.  The evolutionary language game. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  S. Kirby,et al.  The emergence of linguistic structure: an overview of the iterated learning model , 2002 .

[29]  W. Labov.  The social motivation of a sound change , 1963 .

[30]  Charles F. Hockett,et al.  Logical considerations in the study of animal communication , 1960 .

[31]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.

[32]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[33]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Cultural route to the emergence of linguistic categories , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  M. Pickering,et al.  Why is conversation so easy? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Andrew Gareth Vaughan Roberts,et al.  Cooperation, social selection, and language change: an experimental investigation of language divergence , 2010 .

[37]  Luc Steels,et al.  The Emergence of Embodied Communication in Artificial Agents and Humans , 2008 .

[38]  Christian Kroos,et al.  The effects of rapidity of fading on communication systems , 2010 .

[39]  William N. Tavolga,et al.  Animal Sounds and Communication , 1960 .

[40]  Dragan Vukmirovic,et al.  Does Playing Blindfold Chess Reduce the Quality of Game: Comments on Chabris and Hearst (2003) , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  Reinhard Selten,et al.  The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Tanya L. Chartrand,et al.  I Am Too Just Like You , 2008, Psychological science.

[43]  Luc Steels,et al.  The Origins of Syntax in Visually Grounded Robotic Agents , 1997, IJCAI.

[44]  M. Tomasello.  The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[45]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[46]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  The evolution of syntactic communication , 2000, Nature.

[47]  Paul Vogt,et al.  The emergence of compositional structures in perceptually grounded language games , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[48]  Simon J. Greenhill,et al.  Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals , 2011, Nature.

[49]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[50]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  How to invent a lexicon: the development of shared symbols in interaction , 2006 .

[51]  L. Steels.  Evolving grounded communication for robots , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  C. Goodwin.  Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers , 1981 .

[53]  Brian Skyrms,et al.  Signals, Evolution and the Explanatory Power of Transient Information* , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[54]  Goldenfeld,et al.  Simple lessons from complexity , 1999, Science.

[55]  L. Steels.  Experiments on the emergence of human communication , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  J. Stevenson.  The cultural origins of human cognition , 2001 .

[57]  A. C. Santos.  Behavioural and experimental economics: are they really transforming economics? , 2011 .

[58]  R. Krauss,et al.  Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction: a preliminary study , 1964 .

[59]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems , 2010 .

[60]  Theo Rhodes,et al.  The diffusion of novel signs beyond the dyad. , 2012, Language sciences.

[61]  Ichiro Umata,et al.  Graphical Language Games: Interactional Constraints on Representational Form , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[62]  H. Oosterbeek,et al.  Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[63]  E. Morey-Holton,et al.  9 The impact of gravity on life , 2003 .

[64]  E. Marshall,et al.  NIMH: caught in the line of fire without a general , 1995, Science.

[65]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  The self-organization of combinatoriality and phonotactics in vocalization systems , 2005, Connect. Sci..

[66]  C. Goodwin.  Action and embodiment within situated human interaction , 2000 .

[67]  Colin Camerer,et al.  “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[68]  Bradley Walker,et al.  Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols , 2010 .

[69]  Hannah Cornish,et al.  Investigating how cultural transmission leads to the appearance of design without a designer in human communication systems , 2010 .

[70]  G. Lupyan,et al.  Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure , 2010, PloS one.

[71]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[72]  T. Hofmann.  Varieties of Meaning. , 1976 .

[73]  Bart de Boer,et al.  The evolution of combinatorial phonology , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[74]  M A Nowak,et al.  An error limit for the evolution of language , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  Luc Steels,et al.  The synthetic modeling of language origins , 1997 .

[76]  G. Ritchie,et al.  Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication , 2008, Cognition.

[77]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[78]  C. Fowler,et al.  Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English , 1997 .

[79]  S. Gächter,et al.  The science of experimental economics , 2010 .

[80]  S. Kirby,et al.  Language evolution in the laboratory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[81]  C. Padden,et al.  The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.