Assessing the impact of Hungary's public health product tax: an interrupted time series analysis.

OBJECTIVES Imposing taxes on unhealthy goods can generate income, raise people's health awareness, and eventually decrease the prevalence of chronic diseases. Our aim was to assess the impact of Hungary's public health product tax (PHPT) since its implementation in September 2011. Differences in purchasing habits between households with different income statuses were also compared. METHODS A retrospective, descriptive analysis of tax bases and income was carried out, and an interrupted time series analysis using the generalised least squares method was performed to examine the changes in trends regarding the purchase of taxable products before and after the implementation of the tax. The amount of tax base (in kilograms or litres), income (in HUF and EUR), and annual purchased quantity of food and beverage groups per household were assessed. Data were derived from the National Tax and Customs Administration of Hungary and the Hungarian Household Budget and Living Conditions Surveys. The study sample was composed of households who participated in the surveys (mean = 8,359, SD = 1,146) between 2006 and 2018. RESULTS The households' tax bases and incomes increased constantly (with a few exceptions). The total revenue was 19.49 billion HUF (67.37 million EUR) in 2012 and 59.19 billion HUF (168.55 million EUR) in 2020. However, the households' purchasing habits did not change as expected. A significant short-term decrease (between 2012 and 2013) in purchasing unhealthy goods was observed for three groups: soft drinks (p = 0.009), jams (p = 0.047), and fruit juices (p = 0.038). Only soft drinks showed a significant decreasing trend in the post-intervention period between 2012 and 2018 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We concluded that the PHPT did not decrease households' unhealthy food purchasing trend, although it has a positive effect as it can create revenue for health care and health-promoting programmes.

[1]  L. Powell,et al.  Impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax two-year post-tax implementation in Seattle, Washington, United States , 2021, Journal of Public Health Policy.

[2]  L. Kučírková,et al.  Evaluation of estimated direct health expenses on tobacco- and alcohol-related diseases in context of excise taxes revenues in the Czech Republic. , 2021, Central European journal of public health.

[3]  I. Boncz,et al.  Status of Diabetic Neuropathy in Korea: A National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort Analysis (2006 to 2015) (Diabetes Metab J 2021;45:115-9) , 2021, Diabetes & metabolism journal.

[4]  E. Feigl,et al.  Impact assessment of the public health product tax in Hungary , 2020 .

[5]  L. Powell,et al.  Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue , 2020, Journal of public health policy.

[6]  CHAPTER EIGHT. Taxation, Spending, and the Social Safety Net: Hidden Effects on Public Health , 2019, Public Health Law.

[7]  R. Bedi,et al.  Implementation of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations for policymakers , 2019, Journal of public health policy.

[8]  D. Levy,et al.  Potential impact of strong tobacco-control policies in 11 newly independent states. , 2019, Central European journal of public health.

[9]  Y. Yun,et al.  Public support for health taxes and media regulation of harmful products in South Korea , 2019, BMC Public Health.

[10]  D. Endrei,et al.  Assessing the effect of the public health product tax in hungary between 2011-2017 , 2018, Value in Health.

[11]  A. Gasparrini,et al.  Change in non-alcoholic beverage sales following a 10-pence levy on sugar-sweetened beverages within a national chain of restaurants in the UK: interrupted time series analysis of a natural experiment , 2017, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[12]  M. A. Colchero,et al.  Employment changes associated with the introduction of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and nonessential energy-dense food in Mexico. , 2017, Preventive medicine.

[13]  N. Klazinga,et al.  The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): An overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies. , 2017, Health policy.

[14]  A. Gasparrini,et al.  Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[15]  T. Getzen,et al.  The Hungarian Care Managing Organization Pilot Program. , 2015, Value in health regional issues.

[16]  Anikó Bíró Did the junk food tax make the Hungarians eat healthier , 2015 .

[17]  J. S. Clark,et al.  Empirical evidence of the efficiency and efficacy of fat taxes and thin subsidies. , 2014, Central European journal of public health.

[18]  B. Molics,et al.  The effect of performance-volume limit on the DRG based acute care hospital financing in Hungary. , 2014, Health policy.

[19]  P. Pietinen,et al.  The Welfare Effects of Health-Based Food Tax Policy , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  A. Tegene,et al.  Taxing Snack Foods: Manipulating Diet Quality or Financing Information Programs? , 2005 .

[21]  Pakai Annamária,et al.  Research for Nurses Part 2: Methods of sampling and data colection in health science research , 2013 .